Page 2754 of 2754 FirstFirst ... 17542254265427042744275227532754
Results 41,296 to 41,307 of 41307

Thread: ESE's works engine tuner

  1. #41296
    Join Date
    20th January 2010 - 14:41
    Bike
    husaberg
    Location
    The Wild Wild West
    Posts
    12,314
    Quote Originally Posted by wobbly View Post
    Just sent an email to Neels.
    Quote Originally Posted by wobbly View Post
    The answer is NO, wtf is going on - how hard can this be.
    might i suggest as many users as possible on ask the same question (respectfully) in this thread) worth a crack?https://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/s...post1131243035



    Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken

  2. #41297
    Join Date
    30th May 2020 - 23:45
    Bike
    Ktm 990 beta rr 50 racing
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    186
    Quote Originally Posted by wobbly View Post
    WOS, 15* BTDC is an optimum advance number that occurs when the static compression plus the dynamic compression created by the Delivery Ratio and the Trapping Efficiency combine
    to reduce the pumping losses of compressing that retained charge, and if it all works together the peak cylinder pressure occurs near 15* ATDC.
    If you can get away with more advance then one or both of the compression cycles is sub optimum.
    Having to retard the ignition, leads to the opposite conclusion.
    Thanks for detailed explanation Wobb!

  3. #41298
    Join Date
    17th March 2023 - 06:08
    Bike
    1982,Yamaha RD125LC 10W
    Location
    Belgium,East-Flanders
    Posts
    46
    Deleted post

  4. #41299
    Join Date
    20th January 2010 - 14:41
    Bike
    husaberg
    Location
    The Wild Wild West
    Posts
    12,314
    Quote Originally Posted by wobbly View Post
    Just sent an email to Neels.
    KB's top dog has replied for Neels to try now.



    Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken

  5. #41300
    Join Date
    4th December 2011 - 22:52
    Bike
    Yamaha XJ750 1982
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    244

    At last!

    Quote Originally Posted by husaberg View Post
    might i suggest as many users as possible on ask the same question (respectfully) in this thread) worth a crack?https://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/s...post1131243035
    After more than a month I am back! Wow, talk about serious withdrawal symptoms.

  6. #41301
    Join Date
    17th March 2023 - 06:08
    Bike
    1982,Yamaha RD125LC 10W
    Location
    Belgium,East-Flanders
    Posts
    46
    Quote Originally Posted by Vannik View Post
    After more than a month I am back! Wow, talk about serious withdrawal symptoms.
    Welcome back, Neels. I am delighted to be able to read your contribution once again.


    @Wobbly, Mach 0.8 and 51% gives less power when I simulate it. What I have also found is that when Engmod generates a fospipe on my engine, it results in a stinger diameter that causes a Mach of 1.
    And that Mach 1 does not cause any detonation in the fos exhaust or in my own exhaust.
    I think something is wrong and will send a pack file to you and Neels.

  7. #41302
    Join Date
    25th March 2004 - 17:22
    Bike
    RZ496/Street 765RS/Beta/TRS/CFM/ etc etc
    Location
    Wellington. . ok the hutt
    Posts
    21,708
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks for making the effort. And for Spank for sorting the issue. It must be hard for amateurs to cope with odd issues.
    Don't you look at my accountant.
    He's the only one I've got.

  8. #41303
    Join Date
    26th April 2013 - 21:55
    Bike
    BMW R1200R 2009
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    150
    Quote Originally Posted by Vannik View Post
    After more than a month I am back! Wow, talk about serious withdrawal symptoms.
    Great news ! Welcome back, Vannik.

  9. #41304
    Join Date
    8th February 2007 - 20:42
    Bike
    TZ400
    Location
    tAURANGA
    Posts
    4,221
    JVH, having Mach in the stinger nozzle means that tube is sonic choked. ie it is impossible for more flow to happen - talk to GPT about this.
    If its not getting into deto, then that simply means the TubMax is very safely low.
    IMHO, with a bigger stinger @ 0.8 Mach ( plus with MSV @ 40m/s ) and way more compression to push the TubMax up near the deto limit , it will make alot more power.
    The only question to ask is will the new squish configuration cause piston clipping - I doubt it, as for example Jan has said the RSA didnt hit at 0.4mm/14000 rpm.

    I did ask sarcastically " how hard can it be " - what was the actual problem with Neels access here?
    Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.

  10. #41305
    Join Date
    17th March 2023 - 06:08
    Bike
    1982,Yamaha RD125LC 10W
    Location
    Belgium,East-Flanders
    Posts
    46
    Quote Originally Posted by wobbly View Post
    JVH, having Mach in the stinger nozzle means that tube is sonic choked. ie it is impossible for more flow to happen - talk to GPT about this.
    If its not getting into deto, then that simply means the TubMax is very safely low.
    IMHO, with a bigger stinger @ 0.8 Mach ( plus with MSV @ 40m/s ) and way more compression to push the TubMax up near the deto limit , it will make alot more power.
    The only question to ask is will the new squish configuration cause piston clipping - I doubt it, as for example Jan has said the RSA didnt hit at 0.4mm/14000 rpm.

    I did ask sarcastically " how hard can it be " - what was the actual problem with Neels access here?
    Wobbly, Msv 40m/s
    Squishband 50%
    Compression 12.7
    Stinger mach1
    Squish 0,65mm
    Stroke 57mm
    Tubmax 960
    Deto @ Tubmax 970
    Thanks that you will look at it over the weekend.

  11. #41306
    Join Date
    20th April 2011 - 08:45
    Bike
    none
    Location
    Raalte, Netherlands
    Posts
    3,452
    Quote Originally Posted by wobbly View Post
    having Mach in the stinger nozzle means that tube is sonic choked. ie it is impossible for more flow to happen...
    In sonic choked flow, lowering the pressure downstream of the throat will not increase the flow velocity past Mach 1, and neither will raising the pressure upstream of the throat.
    But raising the upstream pressure will increase the gas density and thus the mass flow, even if the throat velocity remains Mach 1.
    One more pedantic point: Mach 1 flow in the stinger may not be Mach 1 all of the time. The practical limit of Mach 0,8 may be an average value derived from practical experience and your Mach 0,8 flow guideline may contain instants of Mach 1. But we must proceed with caution there; Mach 1 all of the time will be risky.

  12. #41307
    Join Date
    8th February 2007 - 20:42
    Bike
    TZ400
    Location
    tAURANGA
    Posts
    4,221
    Here is a stinger nozzle Mach trace at peak power.
    In this and all the other cases I have simulated if 0.8 Mach is exceeded it means ignition or compression has to be reduced to some unexpectedly low value
    as the retained pipe pressure is overly excessive.
    The peak velocity is occurring as the main wave descends down the rear cone and enters the stinger - this plot is logged 1/2 way along a 25mm long nozzle.
    Subsequent peaks and troughs, are reflections and superpositions off atmosphere, the pipe entry and the step up to the main stinger tube, I assume.
    I do not know if going sonic creates a shock wave at the nozzle entry - maybe Neels can enlighten me/us.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Stinger Mach.jpeg 
Views:	75 
Size:	190.6 KB 
ID:	357732  
    Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 19 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 19 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •