The RSW Vs the RSA is not even a close apples for apples comparison regarding the physical layout and many other detail changes - I have serious difficulties attributing
the RSA power increase to simply 25cc of CCR = going from 1.238 to 1.227 = only 8/10ths of 1 % change.
That % would be 0.4 Hp in 54, sure, absolutely worth doing, along with at least 5 other changes with far more significance.
But the RSA had its own downsides - the rear valves gear drive, and the front mounted bent pipe that also negatively affected the bikes weight balance and thus its handling.
Jan has said that given the opportunity to do it again, he would far rather have a valve on each side, not one on the back.
Ive got a thing thats unique and new.To prove it I'll have the last laugh on you.Cause instead of one head I got two.And you know two heads are better than one.
Bookmarks