Page 2255 of 2625 FirstFirst ... 1255175521552205224522532254225522562257226523052355 ... LastLast
Results 33,811 to 33,825 of 39365

Thread: ESE's works engine tuner

  1. #33811
    Join Date
    4th September 2017 - 10:39
    Bike
    Daelim besbi 2008
    Location
    España
    Posts
    300
    Quote Originally Posted by katinas View Post
    3 and 4 types is very similar, except that 3 type, with extended transfers deeper in the crankcase and with relatively higher position of intake tunnels, works in normal way.
    The normal operation is that of scheme 2, it seems a standard configuration.
    The operation of scheme 3 is much lower than scheme 2, I think this is due to the fact that a percentage of the charge gets trapped in the crankcase (in scheme 1 this percentage of charge if it is used and transferred to the cylinder).
    You are doing a great job of research, which is revealing important questions for a better engine development.

  2. #33812
    Join Date
    7th October 2015 - 07:49
    Bike
    honda ns 400
    Location
    Lithuania
    Posts
    469
    Ceci, 2 scheme is not normal std cylinder. The main central intake windows are closed with epoxy and all intake goes through enlarged side tunnels directly to transfer ports, partly to trans window partly through cylinder side cutouts as they are standard, not closed.
    Add two dyno graphs for comparison
    RED- 2 type with closed main intake ports
    GREEN- Same cylinder, just main intakes ports are opened ( brake out epoxy ) say 2.1 type.
    30 minutes between tests. Piston is the same with side pockets.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Green.jpg 
Views:	324 
Size:	844.8 KB 
ID:	345900   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Red.jpg 
Views:	271 
Size:	672.4 KB 
ID:	345899   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Intake.jpg 
Views:	325 
Size:	823.9 KB 
ID:	345898  

  3. #33813
    Join Date
    24th February 2013 - 08:12
    Bike
    1993, suzuki rgv250
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    92
    Quote Originally Posted by katinas View Post
    Ceci, 2 scheme is not normal std cylinder. The main central intake windows are closed with epoxy and all intake goes through enlarged side tunnels directly to transfer ports, partly to trans window partly through cylinder side cutouts as they are standard, not closed.
    Add two dyno graphs for comparison
    RED- 2 type with closed main intake ports
    GREEN- Same cylinder, just main intakes ports are opened ( brake out epoxy ) say 2.1 type.
    30 minutes between tests. Piston is the same with side pockets.
    Thanks for information. It would also have been interesting to see the 1 type without the 1/4 opening and also sensitivity to a bit of changing on the transfer channel volumes..But, a lot of work to do all this. What would you say is the "baseline" power level of the engine?

  4. #33814
    Join Date
    7th October 2015 - 07:49
    Bike
    honda ns 400
    Location
    Lithuania
    Posts
    469
    Norman, yes transfers ports volume, with fully blocked freeway communication between crankcase and transfers ports (just one way from crankcase to transfers ports through side reeds), very important maybe critical for 1 type schematic performance. With ¼ open free way to crankcase add little torque at mid rpm, but top end not changed as tested on the road.
    Cylinder bottom wall area must be fully exploited for side reed valve with 1 type. Still tested only with two side reed petals, but still left free places on the wall to add another pair. With 1 type schematic on the road engine feels much stronger than 2 type in upper gears, maybe because of cooler charge that goes directly from carb.

    Honda NS cylinders designed for 9.800-10000 rpm max power and the biggest restriction is small reed house. Reed cage is even little smaller, than usually used on MX 85 cc engines, and testing on dyno shows big improvement with CR 85 reed cage and even more with Husqvarna/KTM 85 v force3 all the way from bottom to over rev.( later add graphs )
    Now start adapt Honda CR 125 1981 cylinder with so much bigger transfers ports ( that maybe wrongly left from last air cooled CR 125 and not needed for new water cooling engine) , two exhaust ports, and normal for 125 size of reed house.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	cr 85 vforce3 std.jpg 
Views:	137 
Size:	825.8 KB 
ID:	345914   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	reed std.jpg 
Views:	171 
Size:	835.5 KB 
ID:	345915   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Reed petals.jpg 
Views:	118 
Size:	845.6 KB 
ID:	345916  

  5. #33815
    Join Date
    24th February 2013 - 08:12
    Bike
    1993, suzuki rgv250
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    92
    Quote Originally Posted by katinas View Post
    Norman, yes transfers ports volume, with fully blocked freeway communication between crankcase and transfers ports (just one way from crankcase to transfers ports through side reeds), very important maybe critical for 1 type schematic performance. With ¼ open free way to crankcase add little torque at mid rpm, but top end not changed as tested on the road.
    Cylinder bottom wall area must be fully exploited for side reed valve with 1 type. Still tested only with two side reed petals, but still left free places on the wall to add another pair. With 1 type schematic on the road engine feels much stronger than 2 type in upper gears, maybe because of cooler charge that goes directly from carb.

    Honda NS cylinders designed for 9.800-10000 rpm max power and the biggest restriction is small reed house. Reed cage is even little smaller, than usually used on MX 85 cc engines, and testing on dyno shows big improvement with CR 85 reed cage and even more with Husqvarna/KTM 85 v force3 all the way from bottom to over rev.( later add graphs )
    Now start adapt Honda CR 125 1981 cylinder with so much bigger transfers ports ( that maybe wrongly left from last air cooled CR 125 and not needed for new water cooling engine) , two exhaust ports, and normal for 125 size of reed house.
    A big improvement over STD which should be around 21-23? It will be interesting to follow your continued work.

  6. #33816
    Join Date
    7th October 2015 - 07:49
    Bike
    honda ns 400
    Location
    Lithuania
    Posts
    469
    With all std stuff, stock engine 1 cylinder rear wheel power is about 16-18 at 9500 rpm.
    Add video ( youtube- ESE NS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbZwRLXAmIY) from dyno tests , I cant remember what was tried in this video, so many tests, but power started to drop as temperature rise more than 70 c.

  7. #33817
    Join Date
    24th January 2014 - 08:12
    Bike
    1988, Yamaha RD350 YPVS
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    107
    Blog Entries
    1
    If I recall correctly, here were som folks that needed a 60mm piston?

    Well, turns out I did too.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0025.jpg 
Views:	97 
Size:	783.6 KB 
ID:	345925
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	OverrevD60Kolben14.jpg 
Views:	144 
Size:	492.6 KB 
ID:	345926
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	OverrevD60Kolben12.jpg 
Views:	142 
Size:	496.7 KB 
ID:	345927

    Overrev 60mm piston (by Wössner)
    A specialitiy about this piston: The delivery scope contains two wristpins. A light and short pin and a longer, heavier version. The piston has two clip grooves each side - for the short pin, you are using the inner grooves, for the longer pin you will use the outer grooves. The idea is, to change the balancing factor of the crankshaft with very little measure. (And also to have an additional groove on the outside, for a Torlon Plug whilst using the shorter pin )

    Ring position: 90° to the piston pin (central over the inlet)
    Piston pin: 15mm
    Compression height: 29mm
    Piston dome height: 3mm
    Piston length (without dome height): 64.5mm
    Exact diameter: 59.94mm
    Piston pin length: 45mm and 50mm
    Weight, with the short pin: 199g
    Weight, with the longer pin: 205g


    If you need one, write me a PM.
    Regards
    Tim

  8. #33818
    Join Date
    4th September 2017 - 10:39
    Bike
    Daelim besbi 2008
    Location
    España
    Posts
    300
    Quote Originally Posted by katinas View Post
    But maybe your words, nicely confirms test that did not work. Most interesting and informative was 4 scheme test, when engine completely stop at 5000 rpm. as positive pressure blocked intake process when arrive at wrong time.

    3 and 4 types is very similar, except that 3 type, with extended transfers deeper in the crankcase and with relatively higher position of intake tunnels, works in normal way.
    Type 2, the crankcase, transfer tunnels and intake port is a single plenum.
    Type 3, the solid barrier creates two plenums, to be less the% of the crankcase, this has better suction power.
    Type 4, the reeds become a solid barrier creates two plenums, as the% of the crankcase is greater, it loses suction power

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	esquema2.jpg 
Views:	125 
Size:	105.6 KB 
ID:	345929Click image for larger version. 

Name:	esquema3.jpg 
Views:	145 
Size:	122.6 KB 
ID:	345930Click image for larger version. 

Name:	esquema4.jpg 
Views:	142 
Size:	124.3 KB 
ID:	345931
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	porcentajes.jpg 
Views:	134 
Size:	327.0 KB 
ID:	345932  

  9. #33819
    Join Date
    7th October 2015 - 07:49
    Bike
    honda ns 400
    Location
    Lithuania
    Posts
    469
    Yes, maybe this is one of the reason why 4 type capitulate, but maybe not one. When 3 type firstly tested two years ago on NS engine, did not feel any big changes at low and mid range from normal scavenging, but engine revs higher.
    Then tested same on the Suzuki RGV (add photo), but actually this was not 3 type, as intake was placed at the bottom of transfers ports, so we can call it 3.1 type. And engine reaction was not like on NS with 3 type. At 8000 rpm in the first gear engine nearly stopped, but if overcome this, engine revs again. Then made two 16 mm holes on separator sides to add pressure from crankcase and this immediately eliminate dip. So only the location of intake to transfers differs for 3 and 3.1 types.
    Maybe in theme, add engine reaction with different, intake through transfers, timing duration.
    Thank you for good point.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	RGV 250 single 125 vertical.jpg 
Views:	220 
Size:	861.6 KB 
ID:	345934   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	direct intake.jpg 
Views:	238 
Size:	454.5 KB 
ID:	345935   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	RGV DI.jpg 
Views:	222 
Size:	816.7 KB 
ID:	345933  

  10. #33820
    Join Date
    22nd November 2013 - 16:32
    Bike
    STRIKE trike & KTM300 EXC TPI
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    878
    UHV 6 180520

    So, after some thought (and being tied up on other work related stuff) I thought it’d be easier to do the Jante style flow tests, not on a motored engine, but on a simple steady state arrangement. Fortunately our shop vac, blowing thru the setup created approx the same tip lift when being motored at around 3800 rpm. Printed up a simple base plate and gantry to carry a hypodermic syringe pick up needle which is then connected to a U tube manometer. The base plate has a grid of holes on a 4 * 4 pattern that small pins in the gantry locate into, the manometer height being recorded at each position.

    Then conducted 3 tests. After reading the mm H2O heights at each grid point, these were put into Excel and subsequently converted to velocity points. For each test there is a pic of the valve and head. Must point out that there could be quite some differences between these steady state flows and that of a running engine at various loads and speeds.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	97010284_247937069783371_7822072964362272768_n.jpg 
Views:	119 
Size:	167.8 KB 
ID:	345952Click image for larger version. 

Name:	97399796_613855009203386_7888298795971117056_n.jpg 
Views:	162 
Size:	314.4 KB 
ID:	345953

    Could be a bit flaky and dodginess in some instances, but the general flow characteristics can be seen:

    A couple of quick comments could be:
    3 petal. Very high flow in outer circumference plus a high central reverse flow. Not indicated in the test is the very high swirl nature, around 30 deg helical angle.
    Annular. Very high central flow with a strong reverse flow down the outer circumference.
    Convoluted. Similar to annular, but with a much lower, but universal downward flow and almost no reverse flow.


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	3 petal reed.JPG 
Views:	184 
Size:	194.5 KB 
ID:	345951Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Annular.JPG 
Views:	184 
Size:	289.0 KB 
ID:	345954Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Convoluted.JPG 
Views:	169 
Size:	309.5 KB 
ID:	345955

    Overall, I think none of these is suitable, something that I will confirm soon when I can conduct a shootout of all these plus a standard (Schnurle) engine.
    "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm.”

  11. #33821
    Join Date
    18th March 2012 - 08:35
    Bike
    Homebuilt chassi, Kawasaki 212cc
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    660
    Me again with all these questions

    Is there any engine that shares the same Reedcage boltpattern as TZR250 (2ma) engine?

    Rgds

  12. #33822
    Join Date
    25th March 2004 - 17:22
    Bike
    RZ496/Street 765RS/GasGas/ etc etc
    Location
    Wellington. . ok the hutt
    Posts
    20,500
    Blog Entries
    2
    I'm going to say TDR250. But you knew that.
    Don't you look at my accountant.
    He's the only one I've got.

  13. #33823
    Join Date
    18th March 2012 - 08:35
    Bike
    Homebuilt chassi, Kawasaki 212cc
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    660
    Quote Originally Posted by F5 Dave View Post
    I'm going to say TDR250. But you knew that.
    Yeah,, 1kt(tdr engine) and 2ma (tzr engine) is almost the same ones

  14. #33824
    Join Date
    20th January 2010 - 14:41
    Bike
    husaberg
    Location
    The Wild Wild West
    Posts
    11,823
    Quote Originally Posted by SwePatrick View Post
    Me again with all these questions

    Is there any engine that shares the same Reedcage boltpattern as TZR250 (2ma) engine?

    Rgds


    Quote Originally Posted by F5 Dave View Post
    I'm going to say TDR250. But you knew that.
    boyseen 721
    Fits
    YAMAHA R1-Z 90-99

    YAMAHA TDR250 88-

    YAMAHA TZR250 85-87

    Personally i woul be surprised if a few other YZ125 or DT200 ones dont fit.
    One the back old old reed packets boyseen used to have a list by part number of what fitted what.
    I have an old one but it buried somewhere.
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    I reminder distinctly .




    Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken

  15. #33825
    Join Date
    3rd May 2017 - 04:03
    Bike
    1997 Yamaha rd 350
    Location
    Russia
    Posts
    171

    Crankshaft assembly

    Need advice.

    I used on my 2-cylinder boxer crankshaft hardened to 48..52 hrc press fit of conrod pin 0.115 mm at diameter 24mm
    Am I correct or it too much? Getting hesitated. Pin hardened to 60hrc and have internal 10.8mm hole...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 45 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 44 guests)

  1. skako

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •