Would you carry a handgun if the law allowed. What would you prefer?
Forum whore
Would you carry a handgun if the law allowed. What would you prefer?
Free Scott Watson.
Grumpy Old Bastard
No.....cause if I did I would probably shoot someone one day.......probably a cager when I was out riding......can see it now.....bastard cuts me off....rev shit out of machine, come screaming up beside, yank out gun BOOM BOOM through the window..
...driver dead, car swerves into me and I get mashed to bits under the wheels.........nah, better off without the gun.....
. “No pleasure is worth giving up for two more years in a rest home.” Kingsley Amis
Wearing Hi-Viz Black.
Waddaya mean "if"?
Your question is waaaay too open...
It does, and I do.
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
Administrator
Only if I was also allowed to defend my property with lethal force.
You're nuthin
Just call me MacGyver
Forum whore
i have(had) a theory.If motorcyclists could carry guns,and where allowed to use them in the typical car vs bike incident,the frequency of said accidents and the accomanying "i didnt see him" would diminish overnight.
The problem with guns is that any misuse results in (ussually) permanent outcomes....
Average trowel is average!
I'm thankful the law does not permit such a thing. Proliferation =/= safety.
Originally Posted by John Banks
The 2nd-most bad arse KBer.
i so would.
Then I could get a Kb Tshirt, move to Timaru and become a full time crossdressing faggot
Irritant
tsk.. pressed the button too many times.
It's only when you take the piss out of a partially shaved wookie with an overactive 'me' gene and stapled on piss flaps that it becomes a problem.
Irritant
In a previous job, I have carried a (concealed) pistol. As a law abiding person, I never felt the urge to shoot anyone with it.
I've had a big knife under the seat of my car for the last twenty years. I've never felt the need to get out and stab anyone.
Currently, criminals carry handguns. I can't see a problem with lawabiding types doing it for self defence. Especially if shooting taggers became legal at the same time.
It's only when you take the piss out of a partially shaved wookie with an overactive 'me' gene and stapled on piss flaps that it becomes a problem.
You're nuthin
You only have to look at the level of intelligence/caliber (excuse the pun) of respondents who would like to arm themselves to understand why, as Magua says, proliferation does not equate to safety.
Grumpy Old Bastard
Just like in the good ole US of A huh...........?
. “No pleasure is worth giving up for two more years in a rest home.” Kingsley Amis
Irritant
Fuck no..
Let me rephrase then.. Law abiding bright people. That should stop SPAMs having them.
It's only when you take the piss out of a partially shaved wookie with an overactive 'me' gene and stapled on piss flaps that it becomes a problem.
Geriatric hoon
A handgun is the most difficult firearm of all to use effectively and safely. The short sight radius predisposes the bullets to wide dispersion. As in, they are likely to hit anything except what was actually aimed at... Forget the rubbish you saw in the westerns.
The competence level of our Police with handguns is only marginal at best and they at least get (limited) training.
The thought of civilians wandering about with handguns would worry the Hell outa me. Imagine a group of pistoleeros with all of the misplaced confidence and inflated egos of the mormon few. How's that for scary?
Irritant
If they're that ineffective, surely you've nothing to fear?
Nonsense. My SIG was a very effective piece of kit. I hit everything I aimed at with it.
It's only when you take the piss out of a partially shaved wookie with an overactive 'me' gene and stapled on piss flaps that it becomes a problem.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks