Hey folks. Our home puter is due for it's annual subscription of it's antivirus programme. I've used Norton in the past, and about three years ago went to Panda because Norton seemed to slow everything down/take up lots of room. Panda just seems to be a bit of a pain too.
I'm not at all puter savvy, so I was wondering if some of you computer guns could give me the low down on the 2009 version of Norton, both for and against. I don't want to shell out 129 hard earned slides if Norton isn't going to do the trick.
Thanks in advance for your advice
Bookmarks