this what you mean?
http://www.cvam-advanced-riders.co.u...raft_vanishing
As MKTRS explained it, nice.
L'arte italiana cammina su due rotelle!
Yes. Up to a point. After that, as you proceed into and through the corner, what was hidden by the curve will come into view at the same rate as your forward momentum. As long as the curve remains constant. If it tightens, then the VP will get closer to you. And vice versa.
I can't tell you what the ideal distance to VP is, perhaps it is different for each of us. All I know is that I do use this technique (to a certain extent) to judge what speed I do into and through a corner. Especially on unfamiliar roads - if I don't know what to expect, I need some clues before I get there. The moving VP (relative to me) is a good one.
Last edited by MSTRS; 6th February 2009 at 12:19.
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
It was a great movie
worth watching just for the hot naked girl riding the motorbike (a great memory from my youth)![]()
__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Back on a 250 and riding more than ever.
Works for me too. On unfamiliar and non highways I don't know how else you would judge your entry speed into a corner and when, if or how much to twist the wrist by. Of course it doesn't have much application if speed is low on these roads and legal speed is kept to most highways. Thanks MSTRS - for useful posts.
Here for the ride.
line of sight to the vanishing point is hugely improved by NOT getting into a knee down position on the road... tilt head away from lean and enjoy the safety of an extra 20 metres visibility ahead
Just got back from a ride to Wellington.
Some lovely Wairarapa backroads...
Tried to look for vanishing points conciously, but too much distraction from the art of riding.
I did note that I do look well ahead though, which is probably what "vanishing point " theory is all about.
I still have one issue with the VP doctrine, and it may just be one of semantics.
I dispute that the DISTANCE in metres, to the VP can change if you adjust your speed in the corner....UNLESS... what is meant, is that the TIME it takes to reach the VP changes as you adjust your speed in the corner.
yeah right![]()
You are probably correct in saying that. The distance in metres/time to reach determines your reaction time and distance covered whilst reacting.
Perhaps I perceive the VP getting closer if I speed up (but the corner remains constant in curvature) simply because I reach that VP quicker? Of course, the VP is still 'moving' ahead of me, so all an increased speed means is that I have less time before I enter unseen territory. Same is if the corner tightens. Either way I am receiving clues as to what decisions to make as regards my riding at that point.
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks