Mark Lundy - miscarriage of justice?

[Katman]

Well it sure as hell fits in with what the ding-bat ranters on KB refer to as 'evidence' - you included...

You wouldn't recognise evidence if it fucked you up the arse.

[Drew]

You wouldn't recognise evidence if it fucked you up the arse.

Bro, are you autistic?

[Drew]

You wouldn't recognise evidence if it fucked you up the arse.

Wait, what if the evidence was a strap on?

Or, what if the evidence was a big black dog?

Oh oh oh, what if the evidence was a bull in spring time?

I reckon he'd know what it was. Raises an interesting quandry though, what with the evidence tampering with him!

[Katman]

Bro, are you autistic?

Nah, I can't draw for shit.

[korimako1]

Been trying to read up a bit before I spout off the last couple days, this is what I found regarding this specific part of his behavior.

Criminal psychologist Nigel Latta reviewed Mark Lundy's behaviour at the funeral, and noted need to be physically supported by two friends as he emerged towards the hearse, noting that he exhibited signs of what Latta described as "limb-specific grief", in which Lundy's arms were able to carry his weight, but not his legs. Latta described this behaviour by Lundy as a "wilful and deliberate act of deception".

But it's possible he was feeling completely numb, legitimately I suppose. Put on that bullshit act out of not knowing what he was meant to do?

I dunno, I wasn't there.

nigel latta, some else trying to prove himself on Tv with asumptions and guesswork. has he ever spoken to Lundy, i dont think so, but makes opinions on biased Tv coverage that only showed a 5 second clip, not the whole event. Just like the papers as well only showing the rolling of the eyes or a bad look. never a smile or a happy picture, not that he had anything to smile about or be happy after losing his family and then getting fitted up for it.

[Drew]

nigel latta, some else trying to prove himself on Tv with asumptions and guesswork. has he ever spoken to Lundy, i dont think so, but makes opinions on biased Tv coverage that only showed a 5 second clip, not the whole event. Just like the papers as well only showing the rolling of the eyes or a bad look. never a smile or a happy picture, not that he had anything to smile about or be happy after losing his family and then getting fitted up for it.

You didn't read my whole post did you?

I said I wasn't there, and even gave a possible motivation for hamming it up.

You say a lot for someone with a zero post count....

[korimako1]

Police almost blew this one.

They got hung up on the opinion of a pathologist that the time of death was 7pm, and focussed the balance of the investigation around this belief.

If we accept the time of death was 7pm then we have to accept that Lundy is amongst the world best drivers.

We also have to accept that he was able to budgeon his little girl 7 times, then, an hour later put it out of his mind, and have sex.

I'm afraid that for me at least, images of my hacked up wife and daughter would fill my mind, rather than the images of titties that make sex a runner !

Had I been on the jury, I would have found him not guilty.

Police never considered a different time of death, as they just accepted the pathologists estimate as accurate.

However had they given the jury a WINDOW of time, then Lundy could easily have done it.

I think the judge saw that, and was trying to tell the jury "don't get hung up on the three hour thing".

IMHO the right man has been convicted, but it was sloppy work by the pathologist that almost gave him an exit route.

If you actually read the pathologists report and you are aware of TOD regarding stomach contents and you interpret the report correctly, when TOD most likely occurred Mark Lundy was in Petone. There was no other window, the police had to squeeze it in to 7 pm which is false. Brian Bruces Tv show got it wrong as well. stomach contents rule out 7pm and also rule out a 3am scenerio.

[Trade_nancy]

[QUOTE=korimako1;1130576955]nigel latta, some else trying to prove himself on Tv with asumptions and guesswork. has he ever spoken to Lundy, i dont think so,


Isn't this comment of YOURS an assumption? I believe he actually did interview/speak to Lundy.

[Maha]

You didn't read my whole post did you?

Must a Tauporian thing....

[Banditbandit]

nigel latta, some else trying to prove himself on Tv with asumptions and guesswork. has he ever spoken to Lundy, i dont think so, but makes opinions on biased Tv coverage that only showed a 5 second clip, not the whole event.

If you actually read the pathologists report and you are aware of TOD regarding stomach contents and you interpret the report correctly, when TOD most likely occurred Mark Lundy was in Petone. There was no other window, the police had to squeeze it in to 7 pm which is false. Brian Bruces Tv show got it wrong as well. stomach contents rule out 7pm and also rule out a 3am scenerio.

Mark ?? Mark - is that you? Are you on the internet again in the prisoner's computer wing ??

[Edbear]

[QUOTE=Trade_nancy;1130577013]

nigel latta, some else trying to prove himself on Tv with asumptions and guesswork. has he ever spoken to Lundy, i dont think so,


Isn't this comment of YOURS an assumption? I believe he actually did interview/speak to Lundy.

KB..? Members making assumptions..? Never happens!

[scumdog]

You wouldn't recognise evidence if it fucked you up the arse.

I rest my case....

[Drew]

I rest my case....

Oh no, you made a court reference. That's the rest of Katmans afternoon fucked, typing endlessly about cops and courts!

Won't someone think of his customers?!!!

[Edbear]

Oh no, you made a court reference. That's the rest of Katmans afternoon fucked, typing endlessly about cops and courts!

Won't someone think of his customers?!!!

He has customers..?

[Drew]

He has customers..?

That's the word. Happy ones it seems, though I haven't spoken to them all. And I have no idea if there was a non disclosure agrrement at time of payment.