Omission....... Not based on the fact I wasn't speeding no, that's a detail I won't answer at all. "I decided to defend the charge on the grounds that there was serious question as to who the ticket was actually intended for"
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
This place is over-run with fucking retards.
A lot of testimony in this case was refuted and had doubt cast on it by the defence because of time and whether evidence could have been tainted cross contaminated
Only if you are proven guilty
I disagreed when axelohole said I was your Bumbuddy once, I disagree with the barely but I will accept Subhuman
No they are not, evidence is impartial. its facts, it can be interpreted a number of ways though, sometimes
It is not clutching at straws is pointing out that the evidence that the defence so rubbished as being faulty
What am I accused of?
No read the summary of facts you can't just rubbish it then use it, without looking a little contrite.
What I never liked about it regardless was that is was based on a sensory perception Smell
No but he is an expect on behaviour, Not sure how much he gets paid but he's worth it
I think you are underselling him he expresses a lot of stuff esp by Rep comments
We?
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks