Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Tsunami Hits South Part of New Zealand!

  1. #1
    Join Date
    20th April 2003 - 08:28
    Bike
    Something red and quick
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,499

    Tsunami Hits South Part of New Zealand!

    OMG....I hope the people in Bluff are ok.












    "a 20cm tsunami was recorded at Bluff after a magnitude 8.1 quake in the Southern Ocean."
    Quoted from New Zealand Herald today .

    I never knew journalistics can be very exciting. :spudwhat:
    Damn media......
    Elite Fight Club - Proudly promoting common sense and safe riding since 2024
    http://1199s.wordpress.com

  2. #2
    Join Date
    27th November 2003 - 12:00
    Bike
    None any more
    Location
    Ngaio, Wellington
    Posts
    13,111
    Dunno what your problem is mate. Everything that was reported is true/subject to verification. OK, it's a piss poor wave compared to Indonesia on Boxing Day, but the news value in this is that not all big undersea earthquakes end up wiping out tens of thousands of innocent people (not deferring to the discussion recently had on the Scottish thread regarding innocence). It's a good local story -- "there for the grace of god" type stuff.
    "Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]

  3. #3
    Join Date
    20th April 2003 - 08:28
    Bike
    Something red and quick
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,499
    well, according to The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition, Tsunami is "A very large ocean wave caused by an underwater earthquake or volcanic eruption."

    And, according to WordNet ® 2.0, © 2003 Princeton University, a Tsunami is "a huge destructive wave (especially one caused by an earthquake) [syn: tidal wave]".

    I never knew 20cm is classified as 'a very large ocean wave' unless the journo is relatively (very) small.

    This highlights the sick idea of our society being managed by media where they sell ideas and manipulate statistics, dictating what we should and should not do.
    Same idea as "bikers keep left", "front number plates" and "traffic above all else" doctrine, eh?

    Unless, of course, you are a journo? In such case I would apologize for my mistake and make sure I buy your newspaper every fortnight.
    Elite Fight Club - Proudly promoting common sense and safe riding since 2024
    http://1199s.wordpress.com

  4. #4
    Join Date
    7th September 2004 - 10:00
    Bike
    A Krappisaki Tractor
    Location
    South
    Posts
    941
    A Tsunami in bluff ?

    Always thought it was time for NZ to get an enema.


    (A tsunami isnt a high wave - its a wide one, so 20cm is perfectly capable of flooding land 20km inland if the amplitude of the wave is 20km wide - it would certainly make all the rivers run the wrong way which would mean the water coming out would have to find somewhere else to go).
    The contents of this post are my opinion and may not be subjected to any form of reality
    It means I'm not an authority or a teacher, and may not have any experience so take things with a pinch of salt (a.k.a bullshit) rather than fact

  5. #5
    Join Date
    26th August 2004 - 22:32
    Bike
    Darmah, 888, B50SS
    Location
    Alexandra
    Posts
    1,635
    I was wondering how you would know which wave was the tsunami when it hit the beach but, in fact, a 20cm wave at Bluff would be obvious simply because it was so damn small!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    8th December 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    Super Adventure 1290s, Bonnie T214
    Location
    Christchurchish
    Posts
    2,284
    Sorry everyone, it was actually me (well, my Avatar). I jumped in the sea of Brighton pier in ChCh and my fat arse caused one hell of a ripple.
    This weeks international insult is in Malayalam:

    Thavalayolee
    You Frog Fucker

  7. #7
    Join Date
    20th April 2003 - 08:28
    Bike
    Something red and quick
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,499
    Quote Originally Posted by TwoSeven
    A tsunami isnt a high wave - its a wide one, so 20cm is perfectly capable of flooding land 20km inland if the amplitude of the wave is 20km wide - it would certainly make all the rivers run the wrong way which would mean the water coming out would have to find somewhere else to go.
    That is assuming the river and surrounding land is perfectly level and there is no riverbanks involved in the equation? Plus not to mention the ommitions of soil's water absorption (unless Bluff is now a concrete-jungle metropolis) and wind/sun related evaporation.
    Elite Fight Club - Proudly promoting common sense and safe riding since 2024
    http://1199s.wordpress.com

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •