So MNZ have rules proposed to cut costs and there's quite a few threads on here that have ideas that will also limit costs, however.....
The public go to race meetings to see racers racing race bikes don't they? The way we're heading we'll soon all be racing quiet road bikes with standard exhausts and spec as it left the factory to limit cost. Yes the racing will be there but the interest of the paddock for Joe Public will be long gone. I know as a road rider one of the highlights for me and most of my mates was walking a race paddock to see specced up race bikes. Add in a suggestion from someone a while back that we use proper road bike tyres and well....surely the end is nigh!
The cost of racing here in New Zealand when compared to other countries is cheap, very cheap! Track time here is cheap as are entries, even if people do moan about it. Yes wages here are less but if riders here look at the costs of racing versus wages, NZ still comes out way cheaper than the UK for example.
Example- test day at Pukekohe - $90
test day at Snetterton - $270
test day at Brands Hatch - $400
Entry cost for a club meeting-
NZ circa - $100 for one class
UK - $400 for one class
Cost to build a 600cc bike to front running top spec in UK club and National racing (FIM supersport)- $65000+
NZ top spec 600 - $35000
The rules here in my view, as a relative newcomer to NZ, are fine as they are and kits looms and ECU's which are fitted to most of the front running bikes should stay. The same should apply to aftermarket suspension and exhaust systems as it is surely the basis of a spec for the 'race bike'.
I would argue that you de-value the racing here by going any further than what i consider the current 'superstock' type spec of SP600 and SBK.
At the end of the day motorsport is always costly but in my mind with NZ having the cheapest form of the sport already its a wrong move to try and 'cheapen' the sport any further.
Bookmarks