Haha, bugger this "sarcasm is the lowest form of wit" business, I reckon it's fuggin' great!
As I stated in my edit, I like (luuuuurve!) a beer myself, but if I sit down (over a beer) and think about the pro's and con's for banning alcohol it's a pretty one sided list. Luckily for me, but not lots of others, society is hedonistic and values the buzz, the loss of inhibitions, the tax generated, the beautification of aesthetically challenged people etc etc over reducing road deaths, general violence, health problems etc.
Personally I have no problems with alcohol and various assorted challenges in life. Someday I hope to remove the training wheels off my bike and with hard work, courage and an ounce of luck I hope to leave the familial home before I turn 45. I meet even meet a girl....(blush)
Seriously, I probably used the incorrect terminology regarding alcohol. It's not so much a "root cause" as an "enabler". It enables the losers who like to go 'round in groups and bash innocent pedestrians walking home, or enables the oxygen thieves dropping bricks off motorway overbridges, it enables the sacks of shit who take out their angst on the missus after a couple of bevvies too many. Alcohol removes their inhibitions and they actually do the things they've previously only thought about.
So it becomes a balancing act: hedonistic enjoyment of the many vs the pain and death of a few. Which is more important? Is the balance right?
Personal responsibility? It still doesn't compute to allow people to consume a beverage that is known to impair judgement and then expect them to show good judgement. Sure, most of us have no problems, even with the wobbly boots on, but there's a sizeable percentage who have no common sense even when stone cold sober.
I find it interesting you say that, because the last time recidivism was addressed on a grand scale I believe was in 2001, am I correct in asking that, because of human rights issues, reccomendations were not followed through? Hands were tied?
Thats a stab in the dark question though based on recollection...is it strange that Baileys info is the only referencable available research? I do have other local info but not so many letters after the name of the author...
Not that it's outdated its still completely applicable, but can't find much more research in NZ than what he had made available.
Also a contact I have, with a few letters after his name was turned down in his Scoping paper on Issues etc of Recidivist drink drivers, which covered all aspects from law, behavioural, rehab, overseas research, bac limits...turned down...he has some bloody good ideas and stacks of reliable and attributable research.
I find it oddly misleading, that there is nothing available for the public on Recidivism figures.
And we know that would balance the debate back where it belongs...IMHO...
Gone and dragged my own thread RIGHT off topic now...eeeeeeeeek![]()
ter·ra in·cog·ni·taAchievement is not always success while reputed failure often is. It is honest endeavor, persistent effort to do the best possible under any and all circumstances.
Orison Swett Marden
The scenario you describe above does not relate to drink driving. Having a zero tolerance to drink driving will not take away the hedonistic enjoyment of the many, it would only forceably promote a responsible attitude to drink driving, which we as a collective society have shown we cannot acheive with rational and now require a big stick to be waved at us.
Who would really suffer hardship from a zero tolerance to drink driving? I know there would be a great reduction to the alchol related deaths and injuries if this was the case.
A couple of possible unintended scenarios:
1) Whitu has a couple of beers at the pub after work as he's been doing for years. Hey Whitu, it's illegal now bro you'll get busted. Well fuck it, if i'm going to get busted I might as well get really pissed.
2) Hey guys, want to catch up for a drink? Nah it's too far and we can't drive, how about everyone comes over to my place it's nice and close and a cabs real cheap or you can crash on the floor. What would have been a couple of drinks and then leave turns into a big home session. Everyone passes out around 4.30am. Except for jake who wants some eggs and smashes his wife in the face cause he's so pissed.
3) My grandparents who always have 1 small sherry after dinner come for a feed and say "bugger this PC nonsence we've been doing it since the war". They get busted on the way home, become housebound and bitter with the way the country is going, and kark it 6 months later.
It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)
Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks