That Tony Foale book is in my library and I havent read it yet. Ho hum.
Formula 1 is something Ive followed since I was a kid and I thought the mid to late 60s were the golden era, a little bit anachronistic to some of my other views.
Its an interesting field, theres a lot of technology and very fertile thinking going on in spite of constant rule changes. It always amazes me looking at the slow mos of the cars banging over the kerbs while cutting through chicanes. It is so violent and rather suggests that in suspension terms the cars are little beter than go karts but with no chassis flex. Its rather lucky they have tall aspect ratio sidewalls otherwise theyd need suspension that actually moves!
The reason of course they are so rigid is because first and foremost the chassis / suspension setup has to be almost totally subservient to aero function and balance.Flat bottom cars with diffusers need to essentially keep the underside as parrallell and as low to the ground as possible while cornering to assist in creating maximum possible downforce and therefore grip. In straight line situations there must be some very strictly controlled pitch so that positive benefits can be gained from downforce migration from one end of the car to the other to assist in braking and exit grip etc.
Even here in NZ downforce and management of chassis attitude is critical on our humble Toyota racing series cars. The spring rates are huge and we had to instal some reasonably aggressive damping. At low speed when there is no downforce ( exiting pits etc ) you may as well be riding in a block dray.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks