Hi
I brought my Ducati from SA where it ran on leaded petrol. As there is no leaded petrol in NZ, what is the best to use?
Hi
I brought my Ducati from SA where it ran on leaded petrol. As there is no leaded petrol in NZ, what is the best to use?
You're a little light on the information. Year and Model would be helpful. Then there's always google.
Whatever minimum octane is recommended for your model in the owner's handbook. Note that NZ fuel's octane rating is RON.
If you can, use 91 (more power) or 98 (expensive, as it's imported from Perth, but no chance of pinking). Avoid 95 (too much crap added to it to boost the octane rating, so it's sooty).
... and that's what I think.
Or summat.
Or maybe not...
Dunno really....![]()
The manual says:
Gasoline 95-98 RON
http://www.ducati.com/en/bikes/servi...family=manuals
I'm curious what leaded fuel would do to a desmo. Have you had the heads looked at recently? cheers
I'd use 98 then.
Hey, how do bikes go using E10 98? Hmmm.... I probably should have used the search tool before asking that![]()
. No pleasure is worth giving up for two more years in a rest home. Kingsley Amis
Going away, busy?
Need your pets fed @ home or dog walked? go here www.petcarebiz.co.nz
Wanna stay in Kawhia? Have I got the bach for youPM me for details
So if you have been running on leaded fuel, it doesn't have a Catalytic Converter. Good start! I'd get it down to the local Ducati service department to get them to check out the VIN. I doubt it would have any special characteristics differing from an NZ bike however it is always best to check as if it goes wrong, it will be a very expensive item to fix. I'd be surprised if they didn't say that it will be fine on basic 91 grade fuel.
PHEW.....JUST MADE IT............................. UP"
"Research Octane Number".
There are two common methods for measuring/stating the octane rating - RON is the one used in new Zealand.
US uses both methods, so their octane rating gives a lower number (87 Mrkn is about the same as 91 NZ).
Well, from a purely technical viewpoint, based on the octane rating, 98 is unnecessary, and would result in some lost performance. But (however!) the 95 here is of more variable quality, and all comes from the Marsden refinery, where they add toluene and xylene to it (nasty carcinogenic mix that gives the burnt fuel that sickly chemical smell) to get the required octane rating cheaply. Xylene and toluene are byproducts of the refining process, and are used in paint manufacture and a few other things.
However, the 98 comes in from Oz already refined, and is (generally) of a more consistent and clean quality. From personal experience, the 95 was so shitty, my '90 VFR750 wouldn't run on it (it sooted up the tiny electrodes on the sparkplugs). I've had no such problems with subsequent bikes (mostly because I won't use it if I can help it), but my wife's Peugeot pinks badly on it, but runs fine on 98.
If they recommend 95, then use it - plenty of people do, with no problems. My personal preference is to avoid it if I can.
... and that's what I think.
Or summat.
Or maybe not...
Dunno really....![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks