Respectfully disagree. That's like saying no-one ever ever plays a part in having their partner shoot them, hit them, swear at them or any of a vast number of reactions.
That in no way excuses those actions, but I'm certain everyone on this forum has been provoked into saying or doing something they know they shouldn't have, and ordinarily wouldn't have if the circumstances were different.
It shouldn't happen - but it does happen.
It's the willingness and ability to understand that I find sadly lacking.
$2,000 cash if you find a buyer for my house, kumeuhouseforsale@straightshooters.co.nz for details
I'm not saying she didn't provoke him, but you can never justify kicking or hitting someone, no matter what they say or do, save perhaps striking the first blow. Yes, everybody is inclined to snap when provoked, but most reasonable people manage to stop short of physical violence.
"I's no' a bobike (motorbike) - i's a scooter!" - MsKABC's son, aged 2 years.
Agreed. My problem is that in the heat of the moment, rational and analytical thought simply goes out the window. Each party is trying to score points in whatever way they can, women often win verbally and strategically (out thinking the other and winning the argument 2 steps ahead of the guy who is arguing the point before him right now).
So the guy sees red, and responds agressively. Testosterone is a "wonderful" drug. Check out it's links to aggression, and consider the average man produces 40 to 60 times the level of it that the average woman does.
Again - no excuses for what happened... simply seeking to understand what may have contributed.
$2,000 cash if you find a buyer for my house, kumeuhouseforsale@straightshooters.co.nz for details
My following comment is not related to this case, but to the statement above & mdu's reply. It is rather easy to purposefully get the right person wound up enough to react violently especially if you can read the persons personality type or know specific pressure points.
I'm sure I could go out on the street and get myself sconned by a "normal" stranger.
There are ways the brain works that can bypass rationality (the old fight or flight syndrome). If the amygdala (sp?) takes over from the cortex then rationality is basically out of the window.
Prison......... but prison might not be the best for rehabilitation,......
Rehabilitation......
![]()
![]()
![]()
The man (and I use that word in a gender sense only) is a control freak. (I know a few...) - he probably became physical when other methods of control weren't working (ie, the woman was stroppy!)
Everything that has happened, is somebody else's fault.
He will grovel enough to make himself look chastened in the eyes of those whose opinion might matter to him. (prospective employers, etc)
Then it'll be back to control as usual - I pity any woman involved with him.
Little scumbag!
“- He felt that his whole life was some kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.”
Ah, that is God's forgiveness you are talking about. If people required repentance from each other before forgiveness was dispensed there would be sweet f a of it around. Human beings are capable of forgiveness even in the face of the unrepentant. Don't mix that with the requirement of repentance for the forgiveness of sins and salvation.....
allegedly he has married mega-money (this Zoe Halford broad)
so why does he even want to "rehabilitate" his "reputation"? Oh yeah, he's an attention whore. Hateful, just hateful. And I am hate full.
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
I'm not commenting on this particular case in this instance, I was referring to the tangent issue of forgiveness, which was raised by others.
And I am not going to get caught into an argument of whether or not she would offer him forgiveness, whether he "deserves" forgiveness, or any other such speculation. Quite frankly it appears to me that they are both media savvy people who, bringing out my cynical side here, both know how to work and play the "public profile" card.
Trial is by the courts, not the media or a forum such as kiwibiker. Seeing the wolves and vultures squabbling over the juicy entrails of a celebrity carcass is my cue to exit.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks