Good analogy, the monetary system is kind of more complex.
Banks required a certain percentage to be held, and they have a metric that allows them to lend more than the cash on hand.
The amount of money in the economy is fixed. There is no more or no less money in the economy than there was a few years ago. What has changed is actually psychology. People have stopped spending money, (either through lack of access to ready credit, or because they elect to not spend). the lack of money interchanging is what causes a recession/depression.
Before you argue that there is more or less money in the world - unless someone is printing money, then it's fixed. The banking systems around the world treat this as a given.
When countries print money, hyer-inflation is the result. Post war Germany. Zimbabwae under Robert Mugabe.
House prices are a good example - they fluctuate up and down, but it's only when the house is sold, or borrowed against, that the price is relevant. And even then, if you buy and sell in the same market, its largely irrelevant...
There's lots of information about the sub-prime mess, but essentially bad debt risk was overvalued, borrowed against, and of course, it went pear shaped. Irresponsible bankers are the cause of all this misery. Along with a media that hypes anything and everything.
Its diametrically opposed to the sanitised existence of the Lemmings around me in the Dilbert Cartoon hell I live in; its life at full volume, perfect colour with high resolution and 10,000 watts of amplification.
Bookmarks