What is acceptable?

**Mom** · 18th May 2009, 21:24

There is a reasonably new member of KB that seems to have nothing better to do than troll with pathetic, yet tiresome and at times very unsavoury posts designed entirely to insult and offend. There obviously have been a few of us not that impressed with his posts and he has a number of red reps as a result.

Seems that he is not satisfied with pure trolling now, the sending of personal messages has taken his fancy. Disgusting and pornographic attachments seem to be his new styles. I see he is currently serving a bit of time in the bin, and we can no longer show our displeasure at his posts by way of reputation. Is this enough?

Should someone continue to actually be a member if that is the way they want to contribute? Abuse is one thing, being stupid is another, sending unsolicited/uncensored filth by way of PM must surely be a new low?

I have an open profile, I am a member of LOA and am not the receipient of the PM.

**SARGE** · 18th May 2009, 21:27

Originally Posted by Mom

There is a reasonably new member of KB that seems to have nothing better to do than troll with pathetic, yet tiresome and at times very unsavoury posts designed entirely to insult and offend. There obviously have been a few of us not that impressed with his posts and he has a number of red reps as a result.

Seems that he is not satisfied with pure trolling now, the sending of personal messages has taken his fancy. Disgusting and pornographic attachments seem to be his new styles. I see he is currently serving a bit of time in the bin, and we can no longer show our displeasure at his posts by way of reputation. Is this enough?

Should someone continue to actually be a member if that is the way they want to contribute? Abuse is one thing, being stupid is another, sending unsolicited/uncensored filth by way of PM must surely be a new low?

I have an open profile, I am a member of LOA and not the receipient of the PM.

right ... name and shame Mom.. and if previous banned members are any information.. he will be back with a new login anyway ..

i say Tar and Feather and drag him behind a Harley for a few KM

**Laxi** · 18th May 2009, 21:31

Originally Posted by SARGE

right ... name and shame Mom.. and if previous banned members are any information.. he will be back with a new login anyway ..

i say Tar and Feather and drag him behind a Harley for a few KM

on the most pot holed road we can find

**NZ CBR** · 18th May 2009, 21:31

yep, name and same.

No need for unwanted harrasment.

**SARGE** · 18th May 2009, 21:35

Originally Posted by Laxi

on the most pot holed road we can find

so ... any road in NZ then?

**98tls** · 18th May 2009, 21:36

Originally Posted by SARGE

right ... name and shame Mom.. and if previous banned members are any information.. he will be back with a new login anyway ..

i say Tar and Feather and drag him behind a Harley for a few KM

And to top things off whilst being towed behind said Harley he has to continually wave.

**riffer** · 18th May 2009, 21:38

Arrange meeting in meatspace.

Apply liberal application of knuckle to offending mouth.

Problem solved.

**Vern** · 18th May 2009, 21:38

Originally Posted by Mom

There is a reasonably new member of KB that seems to have nothing better to do than troll with pathetic, yet tiresome and at times very unsavoury posts designed entirely to insult and offend. There obviously have been a few of us not that impressed with his posts and he has a number of red reps as a result.

Seems that he is not satisfied with pure trolling now, the sending of personal messages has taken his fancy. Disgusting and pornographic attachments seem to be his new styles. I see he is currently serving a bit of time in the bin, and we can no longer show our displeasure at his posts by way of reputation. Is this enough?

Should someone continue to actually be a member if that is the way they want to contribute? Abuse is one thing, being stupid is another, sending unsolicited/uncensored filth by way of PM must surely be a new low?

I have an open profile, I am a member of LOA and not the receipient of the PM.

Yes I agree I don't hide behind a fancy avatar ( because I don't know how to make one anyway) and I use my real name as all I want is to talk to like minded bike people and have learnt a lot by just reading the threads but it is not the place to be rude to other members. Vern.

**Laxi** · 18th May 2009, 21:38

Originally Posted by SARGE

so ... any road in NZ then?

yep, pretty much

Originally Posted by 98tls

And to top things off whilst being towed behind said Harley he has to continually wave.

you know the rule

no waving within 20m of a harley

**Madness** · 18th May 2009, 21:41

Not acceptable at all.

Nobody sends me porn.

**Hitcher** · 18th May 2009, 21:42

There's a Report Post facility. Also don't be afraid to cut and paste PM contents to your Moderating team.

I suspect that we already have this unnamed-in-this-thread individual in our crosshairs already. The more evidence we have, the easier it is for us to drop-kick wankers like this.

**Gubb** · 18th May 2009, 21:44

Surely naming the fuckwit is just going to boost his ego.

I know who you're talking about though. Kick him in the crotch.

**SARGE** · 18th May 2009, 21:44

Originally Posted by riffer

Arrange meeting in meatspace.

Apply liberal application of knuckle to offending mouth.

Problem solved.

sign me up .. im already in a shit mood

**Winter** · 18th May 2009, 21:45

Name and shame!

My pitchfork needs a good workout!

**SARGE** · 18th May 2009, 21:46

Originally Posted by Hitcher

There's a Report Post facility. Also don't be afraid to cut and paste PM contents to your Moderating team.

I suspect that we already have this unnamed-in-this-thread individual in our crosshairs already. The more evidence we have, the easier it is for us to drop-kick wankers like this.

yea .. banning them ALWAYS works .. time to get un-PC i say