tough call,
unless there are a lot of live witnesses,hell no.
A A thomas would be dead now.he May be innocent
A hundy to swap
tough call,
unless there are a lot of live witnesses,hell no.
A A thomas would be dead now.he May be innocent
forsale A100,awesome power.
near ready for bucket raceing,or just a padock,beach hack.
gotta be a good deal,surely
Rest In Peace
Well for a start get the cunt made sterile,that way he can't breed more wankers,preferably castrated from the neck.
Guilty as for him yep death penalty,as his partner knows he did it,not like others who have circumstantial evidence.
But we are told smacking kids is bad,yep beating the snot out of anyone is to much force,a small open hand slap on a kids bum isn't,this is also different to an open hand whack a person gives their partner.
Failing that let him loose on the army's land area with a pair of jandels,shorts and hoodie in -6deg temp maximum,maybe 8-10 hours walk from civilisation,he'd die a nice slow hypothermic death,only bad thing towards the end he wouldn't feel it.
Hello officer put it on my tab
Don't steal the government hates competition.
Honda Lover
dont you mean their stolen possessions in some cases?Originally Posted by skidMark
plastic fabricator/welder here if you need a hand ! will work for beer/bourbon/booze
come ride the southern roads www.southernrider.co.nz
Den tha thriamvéf̱sei páno̱
Didn't England do that? The Island called... Australia...? And the buggers still escape....Heh...
ter·ra in·cog·ni·taAchievement is not always success while reputed failure often is. It is honest endeavor, persistent effort to do the best possible under any and all circumstances.
Orison Swett Marden
A hundy to swap
do you all really believe in the jury system?
farked if i would trust the average nz'er
forsale A100,awesome power.
near ready for bucket raceing,or just a padock,beach hack.
gotta be a good deal,surely
Honda Lover
yea i think most of us would all be in jail if we had a hard jury system
plastic fabricator/welder here if you need a hand ! will work for beer/bourbon/booze
come ride the southern roads www.southernrider.co.nz
Zombies Are Just Misunderstood
Yeah,...but you lot, keep 'breaking in'....
Just faidin away!
From my own observation I would never choose trial by jury in NZ!
Den tha thriamvéf̱sei páno̱
Heheh. Very True point! I thought about editing my post to reflect that!Yeah,...but you lot, keep 'breaking in'....
Typically female, I changed my mind.
ter·ra in·cog·ni·taAchievement is not always success while reputed failure often is. It is honest endeavor, persistent effort to do the best possible under any and all circumstances.
Orison Swett Marden
Zombies Are Just Misunderstood
Yea, but then I couldn't have done mineHeheh. Very True point! I thought about editing my post to reflect that!
Typically female, I changed my mind.
Forum whore
Took the words outta my mouth.
Pricks who commit violent offences and then reoffend and reoffend and reoffend till the end of time....should be put down. They prove time and time again that they have no respect for anything and anyone, that they are prepared to hurt and injure others...fuck em - nighty night sweetheart.
I think I'd be ok about handing that down if I had to sit on a jury for one these scum....have I mentioned that I still have yet to be called for jury service?
Po ta toes
I've never been called up either! Now that we've said it though, I await that letter next week!!!:slap:..have I mentioned that I still have yet to be called for jury service?
Hardcore Biker
Just a point of clarification here.
David Dougherty was not proven innocent.
The reason he didn't get compensation.
Atheism and Religion are but two sides of the same coin.
One prefers to use its head, while the other relies on tales.
Scooter boy
Wrong fully imprisoned, conviction quashed, another man found guilty, compensation was given. Bad example.
"Those who beat their swords into plows will plow for those who dont"
Den tha thriamvéf̱sei páno̱
August 1999: Grieve asks for further DNA tests on the crime scene samples.
June 2000: The new DNA tests, carried out in Tasmania, show a clear profile of another man.
November 2000: Grieve finds Dougherty has proven his innocence on the balance of probabilities and recommends he receive compensation.
Mr Grieve QC concluded that Mr Dougherty’s has established his innocence to the required standard.
David Dougherty was convicted in 1993 on charges of abduction and sexual violation by rape of a girl then aged 11. He was acquitted on retrial in 1997. The Government has now accepted, following a report by Mr Stuart Grieve, QC, that Mr Dougherty is innocent of these charges and that his eligibility for compensation for wrongful conviction and imprisonment has been established,” Mr Goff said.
July 2001: The government announces a payout of $868,728 to Dougherty and apologises to him.
May 2003: Nicholas Reekie is found guilty of the 1992 rape and abduction of Dougherty's neighbour.
Wrongfully convicted, and proven innocent by DNA. Compensation paid by the then Govt.
ter·ra in·cog·ni·taAchievement is not always success while reputed failure often is. It is honest endeavor, persistent effort to do the best possible under any and all circumstances.
Orison Swett Marden
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks