Antonie Dixon re-trial - machete slasher fu*kwitt

**firefighter** · 25th June 2008, 12:10

The fuckers guilty why a retrial????!!!!! what for??? put the piece of shit down for fucks sake, and forget this second chance shit, his victims haven't had one and iv'e manged to never slice anyone up on a "p" fuelled rampage!!!

**Headbanger** · 25th June 2008, 12:18

Yep, Just kill him. Do it quietly, No fanfare, Just pull that prison van up on the side of the road, Find a good strong tree, and hang him until he is dead.

I wonder what the cost of his actions in monetary terms is currently at? Money that would have been far better spent on a worthwhile cause.

**firefighter** · 25th June 2008, 12:22

Originally Posted by Headbanger

Yep, Just kill him. Do it quietly, No fanfare, Just pull that prison van up on the side of the road, Find a good strong tree, and hang him until he is dead.

I wonder what the cost of his actions in monetary terms is currently at? Money that would have been far better spent on a worthwhile cause.

exactly, put him down the cheapest way possible.......

**Qkchk:Me** · 25th June 2008, 12:34

What an absolute waste of oxygen on that prick.

20 cents worth of lead will save the taxpayer $100,000's per year.

EDIT: Opps, I voted the wrong one, should of been "Bullet in the Head"

**oldrider** · 25th June 2008, 12:49

Put the fucker down, only the legal profession is winning with pricks like him.

**mowgli** · 25th June 2008, 12:59

I may have mis-heard the news but aren't they trying to argue that he's not guilty by reason of intoxication on P. Unless the drugs (and alcohol?) were forced down his neck against his will then this is no excuse. Who invented this loophole? Burn them aswell

**Qkchk:Me** · 25th June 2008, 13:12

Originally Posted by mowgli

I may have mis-heard the news but aren't they trying to argue that he's not guilty by reason of intoxication on P.

Tough shit.

You take the drug, you pay the price.

**Mr Merde** · 25th June 2008, 13:15

Originally Posted by mowgli

I may have mis-heard the news but aren't they trying to argue that he's not guilty by reason of intoxication on P. Unless the drugs (and alcohol?) were forced down his neck against his will then this is no excuse. Who invented this loophole? Burn them aswell

By that reasoning anyone who has been convicted of drink driving isnt guilty either

**mowgli** · 25th June 2008, 13:20

Originally Posted by Mr Merde

By that reasoning anyone who has been convicted of drink driving isnt guilty either

Maybe they mean not guilty of murder, but guilty of the lesser crime of manslaughter. Either way - burn them

**Hitcher** · 25th June 2008, 13:28

How about we just wait and see what the reasons for a retrial are?

**HenryDorsetCase** · 25th June 2008, 13:29

If I recall correctly, intoxication is a mitigation factor, not an excuse. Its been a looooooong time since I did LAWS204 Criminal Law though.

I am also interested in the question of why the convictions were overturned in the first place, and the reasons for suppression. I see they've also just discharged the jury. Fascinating.

Also, aren't most lawyers shit on TV? Like, dude, get some media training if you are going to be on the telly, at least give us some entertainment FFS.

I am totally with you people who want to put two 9mm rounds in Mr Dick-sons temple though.

**James Deuce** · 25th June 2008, 13:36

Originally Posted by Hitcher

How about we just wait and see what the reasons for a retrial are?

No, no, no, we must Kangaroo Court ourselves to an insensible conclusion first!

**firefighter** · 25th June 2008, 13:50

Originally Posted by Hitcher

How about we just wait and see what the reasons for a retrial are?

NOPE!!! the guys guilty, why else would he have been trying to prove insanity instead of just saying it wasn't me? No matter the reason, there is no excuse for spending thousands on this retrial.....although if i'm honest I do want to know why our dollars are being spent on a re-trial- perhaps adding more murder charges?ohhh wait no they'll shorten his sentence...maybe 2 years on good behaviour.

**MisterD** · 25th June 2008, 14:25

Originally Posted by James Deuce

No, no, no, we must Kangaroo Court ourselves to an insensible conclusion first!

It's a waste of time and money - his counsel aren't disputing he did it so either:

a) He's a murdering bastard and we lock him up and throw away the key, or

b) He's an unhinged violent nutcase and we lock him up and throw away the key...