Page 3 of 19 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 277

Thread: OMG RIP here we go again etc

  1. #31
    Join Date
    24th December 2012 - 21:49
    Bike
    Quiet plodder
    Location
    South Akl
    Posts
    2,259
    Quote Originally Posted by AllanB View Post
    Motorcycles were cheap transport once. Not a luxury like they are now.

    Jap import cars kill motorcycles. Why would a young chap spend $10k on a motorcycle when he can buy a fast car that carries five and fill it up with slightly overweight yet scantly clad young women?
    Bugger, I knew I shoulda brought a fast car......

    READ AND UDESTAND

  2. #32
    Join Date
    13th July 2008 - 20:48
    Bike
    R1200RT LC
    Location
    Rangiora
    Posts
    4,646
    Quote Originally Posted by jasonu View Post
    Do you have actual facts to back this up?
    Bike v pole. Just about everyone else managed to avoid it. Hard to blame the pole.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    13th July 2008 - 20:48
    Bike
    R1200RT LC
    Location
    Rangiora
    Posts
    4,646
    Quote Originally Posted by AllanB View Post
    Motorcycles were cheap transport once. Not a luxury like they are now.

    Jap import cars kill motorcycles. Why would a young chap spend $10k on a motorcycle when he can buy a fast car that carries five and fill it up with slightly overweight yet scantly clad young women?
    That's the seminal moment. Jap imports. It's when the decline in bikes started. Today motorcycling is more of a pastime then a utility, as it used to be.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    20th June 2011 - 20:27
    Bike
    Dog Rooter, 1290 SDR
    Location
    Marton
    Posts
    9,845
    Quote Originally Posted by cassina View Post
    Or they just got out of riding school and got unlucky through the fault of someone else.
    No its from your made up bullshit.
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    but once again you proved me wrong.
    Quote Originally Posted by cassina View Post
    I was hit by one such driver while remaining in the view of their mirror.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    25th June 2007 - 21:21
    Bike
    S1000RR
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    6,991
    Quote Originally Posted by HenryDorsetCase View Post
    https://www.stuff.co.nz/timaru-heral...mh-near-tekapo

    That is near the top of third gear, with three more to go! Good effort.
    Solid effort in a Mazda 3!


    If you can make it on Kiwibiker you can make it anywhere.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    26th January 2010 - 19:14
    Bike
    2012 Suzuki Boulevard M50
    Location
    North Shore, Auckland
    Posts
    987
    Quote Originally Posted by Crasherfromwayback View Post
    I call bullshit on that one.
    Crasher, have you anything with which to support such an erudite response.

    I don't have any other information apart from the statement given by a motorbike trainer whom I respect. But my statement does appear to have an aspect of logic to back it up. Those of us who wear hi-viz just might be slightly more visible for the numbats driving cars to see us, and it may be that having chosen to wear a hi-viz we fit into a more conservative subset of motorbike riders who don't take the risks that the squids at the other end of the biker spectrum take. That still leaves us 14 times more likely to be killed or injured, but I'll take any improvement in the odds. By the way, I wore hi-viz right from the start of riding a motorbike, not because of any figures I have heard which support it.

    However, if you do have data to support your supposition, let's have it.
    There are two songs, "Stairway to Heaven" and "Highway to Hell" which I think give an indication of expected traffic flow

  7. #37
    Join Date
    9th May 2008 - 21:23
    Bike
    A
    Location
    B
    Posts
    2,547
    Quote Originally Posted by Old Steve View Post
    Crasher, have you anything with which to support such an erudite response.

    I don't have any other information apart from the statement given by a motorbike trainer whom I respect. But my statement does appear to have an aspect of logic to back it up. Those of us who wear hi-viz just might be slightly more visible for the numbats driving cars to see us, and it may be that having chosen to wear a hi-viz we fit into a more conservative subset of motorbike riders who don't take the risks that the squids at the other end of the biker spectrum take. That still leaves us 14 times more likely to be killed or injured, but I'll take any improvement in the odds. By the way, I wore hi-viz right from the start of riding a motorbike, not because of any figures I have heard which support it.

    However, if you do have data to support your supposition, let's have it.
    Nothing wrong with Pete's (Crasher) assertion. You've more or less worked it out for yourself.

    It's not what you wear, it's how you ride the bike that makes the difference. Positioning and following distance make a bigger difference than the colour of your suit. I do a bit of both, wear black one piece leathers and hi-viz vest or jacket other times. There's a difference that can be seen in how other road users react. The short version is that in cases where another road user doesn't actually look your way long enough, the hi-viz makes no difference. Positioning within the lane and following distance make the difference, oh and of course expecting not to be seen and making an adjustment for that. Call it Roadcraft if you like, and no, following it doesn't make you bullet proof but it improves your odds

  8. #38
    Join Date
    17th April 2006 - 05:39
    Bike
    Various things
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    14,429
    Quote Originally Posted by Old Steve View Post
    Crasher, have you anything with which to support such an erudite response.


    However, if you do have data to support your supposition, let's have it.
    Keep ya hair on. I'm not nor was I having a go at you. I simply think you'll find that any such claim is total bullshit. You'll be doing well to find any such stats. But you're welcome to try and find conclusive evidence to back up the claim. I have better things to do. We still have cunts driving their cars/trucks etc in front of fucking locos. They're quite visible.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    21st March 2006 - 14:22
    Bike
    all sorts
    Location
    Sector 7G
    Posts
    490
    Quote Originally Posted by Crasherfromwayback View Post
    We still have cunts driving their cars/trucks etc in front of fucking locos. They're quite visible.
    Ahh but if the Locomotive was wearing a hi-vis vest ......
    He who makes a beast out of himself
    Gets rid of the pain of being a man

  10. #40
    Join Date
    17th April 2006 - 05:39
    Bike
    Various things
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    14,429
    Quote Originally Posted by Whynot View Post
    Ahh but if the Locomotive was wearing a hi-vis vest ......
    Well, they have headlights that could melt the sun, make the ground shake, and a horn that could wake the dead. But yeah. maybe a high vis would be the answer.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    20th January 2008 - 17:29
    Bike
    1972 Norton Commando
    Location
    Auckland NZ's Epicentre
    Posts
    3,554
    Quote Originally Posted by Crasherfromwayback View Post
    Keep ya hair on. I'm not nor was I having a go at you. I simply think you'll find that any such claim is total bullshit. You'll be doing well to find any such stats. But you're welcome to try and find conclusive evidence to back up the claim. I have better things to do. We still have cunts driving their cars/trucks etc in front of fucking locos. They're quite visible.
    I was in the van the other day and the train approaching lights and bells started ringing, the cars stopped and the barrier arms dropped.

    I was quite surprised to see a motorcycle weave past the cars and thru the lowered arms.

    Can't say if he had Hi Viz on as i was in dumb arse cager mode with stereo cranked and reading KB posts on my phone
    DeMyer's Laws - an argument that consists primarily of rambling quotes isn't worth bothering with.

  12. #42
    Join Date
    15th February 2005 - 15:34
    Bike
    Katanasaurus Rex
    Location
    The Gates of Delirium
    Posts
    8,982
    Quote Originally Posted by Old Steve View Post
    By the way, I wore hi-viz right from the start of riding a motorbike, not because of any figures I have heard which support it.
    Did it save you from any of your previous crashes?

  13. #43
    Join Date
    12th July 2003 - 01:10
    Bike
    Royal Enfield 650 & a V8 or two..
    Location
    The Riviera of the South
    Posts
    14,068
    Quote Originally Posted by Voltaire View Post
    Here is the Ministry of Transports report for 2016.

    http://www.transport.govt.nz/researc...clecrashfacts/

    The figures for motorcyclist at fault in a crash are lower than expected, going by my experience I expected it to be nearer 75%
    Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........
    " Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"

  14. #44
    Join Date
    13th July 2008 - 20:48
    Bike
    R1200RT LC
    Location
    Rangiora
    Posts
    4,646
    All this discussion about fault. As if fault makes any difference.

    It's still us who end up in the ambulance or hearse.

    How about we stop rolling around in an argument about fault and think about what we can do to prevent being someone else's victims.

    For example, instead of blaming crap roads for our woes, how about we ride like the roads are crap. Instead of erupting about people not giving way, how about we ride like people might not give way.

    Just a thought.

  15. #45
    Join Date
    2nd December 2009 - 13:51
    Bike
    A brmm, brmm one
    Location
    Upper-Upper Hutt
    Posts
    2,153
    Quote Originally Posted by Whynot View Post
    Ahh but if the Locomotive was wearing a hi-vis vest ......
    But they are, it's the whole reason the front of every train is yellow (tho that could potentially change thanks to headlight improvements)

    Quote Originally Posted by RSSB
    "Historically train fronts were required to have a yellow panel in order to make them more visible, a move which came in the 1950s when newer diesel and electric trains were found to be far quieter than steam."
    Science Is But An Organized System Of Ignorance
    "Pornography: The thing with billions of views that nobody watches" - WhiteManBehindADesk

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •