Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: Registration and insurance

  1. #1
    Join Date
    3rd February 2004 - 08:11
    Bike
    2021 Street Triple RS, 2008 KLR650
    Location
    Wallaceville, Upper hutt
    Posts
    5,227
    Blog Entries
    5

    Registration and insurance

    WRT the ACC levy, a number of people (self included) are considering putting rego on hold. This raises the insurance question. I sent the following to State (who cover the mighty KLR) and their response follows:

    (Me to them)
    With regards to motor vehicle insurance - if a vehicle which is covered by a current State Insurance policy is involved in an accident and the registration of that motor vehichle is not current, would that be grounds for State to deny insurance cover? Could you please quote the relevant section of the policy in your reply.

    (Them to me)
    In regards to your online enquiry :

    If a vehicle has an accident when its registration is not up to date we would still consider the claim on a without prejudice basis.
    If the vehicle in question was not at fault for the accident then we would accept the claim (if everything else was OK) as your vehicle being on the road was not causative to the accident.
    If you think your vehicle was at fault then it is possible your claim would be accepted but we would need to discuss the exact circumstances with you to determine this.

    In any case the best option is to contact State on 0800 80 24 24 and speak to one of our claims consultants who can help with your query.

    Policy Wordings to take note of :

    This is under Exclusions that apply to the whole policy:

    Unsafe or unroadworthy
    You’re not covered if the vehicle is being used in an unsafe or unroadworthy condition, and:
    1. the condition of the vehicle contributed to loss or liability,
    and
    2. the driver should have been aware of that condition and that the condition could result in damage to the vehicle.

    (Me again)
    Note item 1. Could anyone argue a registration label (or lack of) could contribute to loss or liability?
    it's not a bad thing till you throw a KLR into the mix.
    those cheap ass bitches can do anything with ductape.
    (PostalDave on ADVrider)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    1st November 2005 - 08:18
    Bike
    F-117.
    Location
    Banana Republic of NZ
    Posts
    7,048
    Ask them about having a current WOF but not a rego.
    The WOF is the "safety check" of the bike.
    TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”

  3. #3
    Join Date
    23rd October 2007 - 13:31
    Bike
    2009 TBird Big Bore 1700
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    759
    Quote Originally Posted by pete376403 View Post
    This is under Exclusions that apply to the whole policy:

    Unsafe or unroadworthy
    You’re not covered if the vehicle is being used in an unsafe or unroadworthy condition, and:
    1. the condition of the vehicle contributed to loss or liability,
    and
    2. the driver should have been aware of that condition and that the condition could result in damage to the vehicle.
    I would assume they could argue that no WOF could be deemed as being "unroadworthy". It's a bit of a grey area because just because the WOF has expired doesn't mean it wouldn't pass with flying colours.
    Seems the risks of no WOF or rego are too great as insurance co's are notorious for finding any reason whatsoever to not pay out.
    Shaken, not stirred in the shakey city!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    17th October 2008 - 00:27
    Bike
    87 Honda VTZ250
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    589
    Quote Originally Posted by pete376403 View Post
    If a vehicle has an accident when its registration is not up to date we would still consider the claim on a without prejudice basis.
    This answers your question, they are saying "doesn't matter if it has registration or not, we still look at the claim". Also see the many previous threads here which quote the actual law. No registration does not mean instamatic loss of insurance, your lack of registration would have to have directly contributed to the loss/accident for the claim to be denied, which would be pretty damn difficult to show how not having a bit of paper contributed.

    Unsafe or unroadworthy

    Note item 1. Could anyone argue a registration label (or lack of) could contribute to loss or liability?
    No. How exactly would you do that. "Your car was stolen because your bit of paper was expired". "You hit that car because your bit of paper was expired". "They ran up the back of you because your bit of paper was expired". No, no and a bit fat no.

    If your warrant is expired AND some part of the vehicle which would have failed contributed to the claim (eg your brake lights didn't work and somebody ran up the back of you), THEN the insurers could rightly deny the claim.

    BUT NOTE that having a warrant doesn't mean they would pay anyway, the insurers expect your vehicle to BE in warrantable condition, if you had a warrant but your brake lights didn't work the insurers may well use the "your vehicle was not maintained in a safe condition" out clause anyway.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    I am specifically advised by Swann Insurance that, whilst they do not in any way condone riding without registration, or any other unlawful activity, they are aware of the provisions of the Insurance Law reform Act 1977, and would not consider lack of registration to be material to a claim. Other insurers may vary. If yours have a problem, the solution seems obvious.
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  6. #6
    Join Date
    21st July 2009 - 08:23
    Bike
    675cc of pure awesome.
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    140
    Ex insurance industry goon (claim recovery officer) here: In order to decline a claim the the reason for declinature must be directly contributory to the loss. For example if you are driving without a WOF with bald tyres and bung breaks and you're rear ended whilst stopped at a red light the claim can not be declined as the brakes etc weren't contributory to the loss.

    Same thing applies here. However, it could be argued that if your vehicle isn't registered it shouldn't be on the road and hence wouldn't be in an accident. Fine line yo.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    29th November 2007 - 07:08
    Bike
    Triumph Daytona 1050 - one of a kind
    Location
    Pakuranga
    Posts
    289
    I'm in a similar position currently (with an insurance company) - IMHO no insurance company could decline a claim whether at fault or otherwise simply for having an expired rego

    well in NZ anyway

  8. #8
    Join Date
    3rd February 2004 - 08:11
    Bike
    2021 Street Triple RS, 2008 KLR650
    Location
    Wallaceville, Upper hutt
    Posts
    5,227
    Blog Entries
    5
    I was specifically referring to no registration. I understand that no WoF would be grounds for refusal.
    You don't need registration to get a warrant (But you do need a warrant to get rego)
    it's not a bad thing till you throw a KLR into the mix.
    those cheap ass bitches can do anything with ductape.
    (PostalDave on ADVrider)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    25th September 2009 - 18:05
    Bike
    A bleck one.
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    468
    Quote Originally Posted by pete376403 View Post
    I was specifically referring to no registration. I understand that no WoF would be grounds for refusal.
    You don't need registration to get a warrant (But you do need a warrant to get rego)
    You don't actually HAVE a WoF - all you really have is evidence that on the date of inspection, the inspector considered the vehicle roadworthy according to the regulations that determine roadworthynes, not that it was roadworthy at the time of the accident.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    26th January 2006 - 18:14
    Bike
    .
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    1,527
    Several months ago I asked an insurance assessor who works on behalf of an insurance company I happen to be a customer of, "what would happen if my motorcycle was not currently licensed in the event of an accident. Would it mean that the claim would be denied?".

    His reply was that a motor vehicle license, or even a current warrant of fitness, means nothing in regards the acceptance or refusal of any claim. What does factor is the roadworthiness of the bike at the time of the accident. This is because the existance of a warrant of fitness sticker does not guarantee roadworthiness at any time other than at the point in time it was issued, and a registration sticker only means that you have paid taxes, so in no way would have any bearing on the circumstances of any accident.

    In other words, whether or motorcycle is registered or warranted means very little in the event of a claim if you use an insurance company that is worth the premiums it charges.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    3rd August 2006 - 19:35
    Bike
    B12
    Location
    West Auckland
    Posts
    2,800
    But of course if you are involved in an accident with No rego, even if you are lying in bits on the road or whatnot, theyll still be a copper standing there writing out a ticket for no rego!
    Quote Originally Posted by NinjaNanna View Post
    Wasn't me officer, honest, it was that morcs guy.
    Quote Originally Posted by Littleman View Post
    Yeah I do recall, but dismissed it as being you when I saw both wheels on the ground.
    Quote Originally Posted by R6_kid View Post
    lulz, ever ridden a TL1000R? More to the point, ever ridden with teh Morcs? Didn't fink so.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    25th September 2009 - 18:05
    Bike
    A bleck one.
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    468
    Quote Originally Posted by Morcs View Post
    But of course if you are involved in an accident with No rego, even if you are lying in bits on the road or whatnot, theyll still be a copper standing there writing out a ticket for no rego!
    Better $200 than $800...
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. My signature is my best friend. It is my life. I must master it as I must master my life. Without me, my signature is useless. Without my signature, I am useless.

    The early bird might get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    25th October 2002 - 17:30
    Bike
    GSXR1000
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,291
    Quote Originally Posted by Morcs View Post
    But of course if you are involved in an accident with No rego, even if you are lying in bits on the road or whatnot, theyll still be a copper standing there writing out a ticket for no rego!
    Not always. When I paralysed my arm in my big accident I had no current reg (warrant was current) and I didn't get a ticket. Police visited me in hospital, told me they knew it was lapsed but issued no ticket.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    1st November 2005 - 08:18
    Bike
    F-117.
    Location
    Banana Republic of NZ
    Posts
    7,048
    Quote Originally Posted by Morcs View Post
    But of course if you are involved in an accident with No rego, even if you are lying in bits on the road or whatnot, theyll still be a copper standing there writing out a ticket for no rego!
    Quota? What quota...
    TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”

  15. #15
    Join Date
    24th August 2008 - 15:47
    Bike
    2008 Kawasaki 650
    Location
    Nth Canty
    Posts
    72
    Certain exclusions forbidden
    Where—
    6
    Reprinted as at
    3 September 2007 Insurance Law Reform Act 1977 s 12

    (a) By the provisions of a contract of insurance the circumstances
    in which the insurer is bound to indemnify the
    insured against loss are so defined as to exclude or limit
    the liability of the insurer to indemnify the insured on
    the happening of certain events or on the existence of
    certain circumstances;
    and
    (b) In the view of the Court or arbitrator determining the
    claim of the insured the liability of the insurer has been
    so defined because the happening of such events or the
    existence of such circumstances was in the view of the
    insurer likely to increase the risk of such loss occurring,—
    the insured shall not be disentitled to be indemnified by the
    insurer by reason only of such provisions of the contract of
    insurance if the insured proves on the balance of probability
    that the loss in respect of which the insured seeks to be
    indemnified was not caused or contributed to by the happening
    of such events or the existence of such circumstances.

    They cannot refuse a claim on the grounds that you did not have your bike registered. They would have to repeal this act before this could change
    I'm out of my mind, but feel free to leave a message.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •