View Full Version : Cops shoot machete-wielding actor
JimO
27th July 2009, 18:05
unfortunatly he isnt dead
Mully
27th July 2009, 18:08
Link or it didn't happen.....
wbks
27th July 2009, 18:11
Link or it didn't happen.....GOOGLE MUFUCKA!!! http://www.3news.co.nz/
Mully
27th July 2009, 18:13
GOOGLE MUFUCKA!!! http://www.3news.co.nz/
I need not google - someone on here will supply me the link.
Like so.
Now the entire cast of Shortland Street and we'll be getting somewhere!:yes:
Whats the bloody matter with our :Police: aye?
Why can't the buggers :2guns: straight?
Are their :blink: screwy or something?
Finn
27th July 2009, 18:43
He was about as good at acting as he was dying. I think he was a token Maori quota filler. Thank god those days are over.
Dave Lobster
27th July 2009, 18:56
Why don't they go for head shots?
Laxi
27th July 2009, 18:58
Why don't they go for head shots?
thats the problem, they fooking were, now if thay aimed for his big toe they'd get him between the eyes:no:
peasea
27th July 2009, 19:02
unfortunatly he isnt dead
They've got the bullet out, the cops could always have another go.
Usarka
27th July 2009, 19:56
What a drama!
Forest
27th July 2009, 21:03
I've heard of method acting, but this takes things to a whole new level.
That man is committed to his craft.
ynot slow
27th July 2009, 21:53
How come the cop never used blanks like in the movies?
Or why wasn't he blown to smitherines like the movies?
popa griffin
28th July 2009, 01:22
Why don't they go for head shots?
Because they are trained to aim for the biggest mass. Being your torso.
Less chance of missing and said bullet going into a house down the road.
Remember they are fireing these guns around civies.
davebullet
28th July 2009, 08:38
Maybe he got confused and thought he was on set?
MSTRS
28th July 2009, 09:23
Because they are trained to aim for the biggest mass. Being your torso.
Less chance of missing and said bullet going into a house down the road.
Remember they are fireing these guns around civies.
Yet still they manage to hit and kill innocent bystanders...
Swoop
28th July 2009, 09:34
How come the cop never used blanks like in the movies?
Or why wasn't he blown to smitherines like the movies?
Reality is a concept that has been lost on Hollywood.
Mully
28th July 2009, 10:17
I've heard of method acting, but this takes things to a whole new level.
That man is committed to his craft.
I thought that - maybe he was getting into character to play Stephen Wallace (that clown in Waitara who commited suicide-by-cop a few years back)
ready4whatever
28th July 2009, 10:48
because they dont shoot to kill.
i find it hardcase that they had to fly a guy down from auckland with a taiser for that stick weilding guy, just get a couple cops with more sticks, problem solved. problem is the cops are too scared and always call the armed offenders
Mr Merde
28th July 2009, 11:49
because they dont shoot to kill.
i find it hardcase that they had to fly a guy down from auckland with a taiser for that stick weilding guy, just get a couple cops with more sticks, problem solved. problem is the cops are too scared and always call the armed offenders
You always shoot to kill.
It is extremely hard to train anyone to shoot to wound or incapacitate. Even military snipers who may have years of training , not weeks or days as the average police officer does, is trained to shoot to kill.
The big difference being that a properly trained sniper will know his\her equipment a lot better, be more proficient in its use and therefore find themselves in a position to possibly shoot not to kill.
Hollywood has a shit load to answer for. Perpetuating the myth that in a stressful situation a person with a firearm will take the time to put a bullet in a part of the human anatomy that will incapacitate that person.
Bah Humbug.
What I find strange about yesterdays event is that the person shot didnt have a leathal "golf club" or "chair leg" as we know that the officer on the ground is mortally afraid of those deadly weapons.
Swoop
28th July 2009, 11:55
What I find strange about yesterdays event is that the person shot didnt have a leathal "golf club" or "chair leg" as we know that the officer on the ground is mortally afraid of those deadly weapons.
The offender had a knife. In fact two of them and a machete!
I cannot understand why the police were worried. They have been issued stab-proof vests...
Have the taxpayers wasted more money here?
Mr Merde
28th July 2009, 12:03
The offender had a knife. In fact two of them and a machete!
I cannot understand why the police were worried. They have been issued stab-proof vests...
Have the taxpayers wasted more money here?
Three hands to weild them?
Whats happened to containment.
If the antogonist is advancing then retreat, keeping him\her contained in a safety zone.
Stab proof vests, pepper spray, US style batons and numbers. They had it all their way.
Testosterone and adreniline take over and someone gets hurt.
Couldnt even wait for the quasi military to arrive.
From what I have seen of police marksmanship I am guessing that the officer fired a warning shot which just happened to hit the man. Couldnt have been aimed as it actually hit the so called offender.
boomer
28th July 2009, 12:05
why didnt they fly teh tazza man in from his private hide away..
Tazza his ass, send tazza man back to his secret hide out and voila..
more jail bait and the coppers can all stand about and watch pretending they're actually good for fook all..
useless coonts
slofox
28th July 2009, 12:08
Years ago I used to watch big game hunting movies where they shot huge nets over wild animules...maybe we could use them...or tranquillizer darts, or spray 'em with superglue or or or...whatever...
I reckon the dude was just rehearsing anyway...
Mr Merde
28th July 2009, 12:11
why didnt they fly teh tazza man in from his private hide away..
Tazza his ass, send tazza man back to his secret hide out and voila..
more jail bait and the coppers can all stand about and watch pretending they're actually good for fook all..
useless coonts
I have missed this mans way of stating, that which we are all thinking, in simple terms.
Welcome back BOOMER
Hitcher
28th July 2009, 12:47
What's the betting that P was involved in this?
Indoo
28th July 2009, 12:57
Should just send in the armchair critics next time, they always know best, and given that they have no knowledge, training or experience in what they are talking about its not like we are risking much.
boomer
28th July 2009, 12:59
Should just send in the armchair critics next time, they always know best, and given that they have no knowledge, training or experience in what they are talking about its not like we are risking much.
Are you TA.. i can smell the training on you
Hoon
28th July 2009, 13:11
Should just send in the armchair critics next time, they always know best, and given that they have no knowledge, training or experience in what they are talking about its not like we are risking much.
I think you'll find that even if armed with a stab proof vest, baton and pepper spray, their balls would shrivel up while they run in the opposite direction screaming for the Police to shoot him.
Pepper spray isn't much use in the wind or if you can't get close enough to use it.
I'm no knife expert but I like my chances of taking down a stab proof vest wearing baton wielding opponent. I'd shoot the fucker too if it were me.
Finn
28th July 2009, 16:27
Another one today... Nobody got shot but this one was at a motorcycle shop...
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/2682540/Waikato-AOS-callout-over
Hoon
29th July 2009, 11:50
Ohh nah thats all good and fine. There's only one thing that the one-eyed kiwibiker cop bashing brigade hates more than cops and that is motorcycle thieves so you'll now find them complaining about the lack of force instead of the excessiveness.
MarkyMark
30th July 2009, 00:26
You always shoot to kill.
No, you shoot to stop. Aim at the largest target (centre of chest) and keep firing until you no longer fear for your life. In this case one shot was all that took. Killing may be a consequence, and you'd be a fool to aim for a limb in an effort to avoid it, but it is not what you're trying for.
MaxB
30th July 2009, 01:31
Am I right in thinking that the guy was shot with an M4 Carbine? The news showed a cop handing one over to his boss for inspection.
If so that is a hell of a lot of stopping power for law enforcement. Plus the actor should feel grateful he didn't get totally fucked up by the bullet.
The cop probably had to drop him given the risk of the rifle falling into the actor's hands. Thats what you get when you take your nice toys out. As has been said a Tazer would have been ideal for this situation.
popa griffin
30th July 2009, 06:48
Am I right in thinking that the guy was shot with an M4 Carbine? The news showed a cop handing one over to his boss for inspection.
I must not know my guns very well. I could have bet my life it was a M16.
That or I didnt look very closely.
Usarka
30th July 2009, 10:08
At least there was a method to his madness......
Finn
30th July 2009, 10:37
Suicide by Cop. Just another example of the public assisting the police where possible. In this case, nothing beats a real person for target practice.
Swoop
30th July 2009, 10:44
Am I right in thinking that the guy was shot with an M4 Carbine?
Nope. Glock was used = 9mm.
I must not know my guns very well. I could have bet my life it was a M16.
Bushmaster is the manufacturer. "Looks like" an M-16 but isn't... if ya get what I mean.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.