View Full Version : Most of the force went downwards
James Deuce
26th September 2009, 21:10
Well it would, wouldn't it?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8276016.stm
98tls
26th September 2009, 21:16
:laugh::laugh: "mother i cant eat another thing" "yes you can Ali you still have room for the detonator".
Madness
26th September 2009, 21:18
I wonder if he levitated as a result. The Jihad Jetpack
mstriumph
26th September 2009, 21:21
Well it would, wouldn't it?
was that a sly reference to the reputed enlargement of arabs' fundemental orifices [orifae??] due to ... erm ... extratesticular activities of a gender-similar nature?
*tails off into silence and backs cautiously away* :no:
YellowDog
26th September 2009, 21:23
Ewewe........... that's not nice.
The thousand virgins waiting for him would be dissapointed that the blast went downwards.
98tls
26th September 2009, 21:25
:laugh:made me think of this.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhltN2BW74o
Oakie
27th September 2009, 08:14
In the wee clip they showed on TV last night the explosive appeared to be a standard hand grenade.
Highlander
27th September 2009, 08:20
..."Only the attacker died, but it is feared that the new development could be copied by others. "...
Especially now that it has made headline news around the world.
Wonder if the media ever questions the role they have played in copy cat type crimes.
jonbuoy
27th September 2009, 08:26
Sounds like the metal detectors were not used or working properly, A few inches of blubber and bone shouldn't stop them picking something up, might not have been very much metal to detect in it though. I would have thought the wires poking out of his brown eye would have given it away :laugh:
Usarka
27th September 2009, 09:24
I thought I'd had some explosive curries in my time........
James Deuce
27th September 2009, 10:21
Sounds like the metal detectors were not used or working properly, A few inches of blubber and bone shouldn't stop them picking something up, might not have been very much metal to detect in it though. I would have thought the wires poking out of his brown eye would have given it away :laugh:
Metal detectors don't work on internal explosives as mentioned in the actual "News Story". The BBC is quite a good source of information because they still care about presenting a story rather than a politically biased sound bite.
That is why the security personnel mentioned in the "News Story" are a bit worried.
Laava
27th September 2009, 14:25
In the wee clip they showed on TV last night the explosive appeared to be a standard hand grenade.
wonder how he detonated that? Surely that would require some type of pilates manoeuvre?
http://lh4.google.com/thesamurairadiologist/R-GXur24FvI/AAAAAAAAAR4/Z36c3tOSJdw/Oops-swallowed-a-grenade-small.jpg
Usarka
27th September 2009, 15:12
Pin was attached to his nipple. A quick gripple and BOOM!
James Deuce
27th September 2009, 17:01
wonder how he detonated that? Surely that would require some type of pilates manoeuvre?
mstriumph has already hinted at the expert nature of some Middle Eastern back passages.
Elysium
27th September 2009, 18:39
The only way you're going to stop those guys is to simply ban muslims, unless the public don't mind cavity searches by airport security for all passengers. :buggerd:
jonbuoy
27th September 2009, 19:11
Metal detectors don't work on internal explosives as mentioned in the actual "News Story". The BBC is quite a good source of information because they still care about presenting a story rather than a politically biased sound bite.
That is why the security personnel mentioned in the "News Story" are a bit worried.
Metal detectors don't work on plastic explosives full stop. Explosives detectors do. Metal detectors would be picking up on the detonator/wiring.
James Deuce
27th September 2009, 19:25
Metal detectors don't work on plastic explosives full stop. Explosives detectors do. Metal detectors would be picking up on the detonator/wiring.
Read the article.
They don't. It was a grenade, not c4 and the metal detectors STILL didn't pick it up.
nudemetalz
27th September 2009, 19:38
Read the article.
They don't. It was a grenade, not c4 and the metal detectors STILL didn't pick it up.
Of course it didn't pick it up. The grenade was made of "pineapple"... :laugh:
paddy
27th September 2009, 19:40
The BBC is quite a good source of information because they still care about presenting a story rather than a politically biased sound bite.
Definitely seconded.
Usarka
27th September 2009, 19:41
Free prostate checks at airport security......:eek:
jonbuoy
27th September 2009, 20:19
Read the article.
They don't. It was a grenade, not c4 and the metal detectors STILL didn't pick it up.
Seems pointless continuing this but did you read the article you linked to Jim? The link doesn't mention "grenade". It mentions a device triggered by a mobile phone. Walk through Metal detectors can pick up hip and knee implants, hand helds are better still. Are they saying this is the first time anyone has ever thought of shoving an explosive/stripped down handgun up their arse to get through security? Someone or something fucked up. I spent three months in Jeddah last year - nothing & nobody worked quite as it should.
Quote:
Security and intelligence experts are deeply worried by a new development in suicide bombing, the BBC has learned.
It has emerged that an al-Qaeda bomber who died last month while trying to blow up a Saudi prince in Jeddah had hidden the explosives inside his body.
Only the attacker died, but it is feared that the new development could be copied by others.
Experts say it could have implications for airport security, rendering traditional metal detectors "useless".
Last month's bombing left people wondering how one of the most wanted al-Qaeda operatives in Saudi Arabia could get so close to the prince in charge of counter-terrorism that he was able to blow himself up in the same room.
Western forensic investigators think they have the answer, and it is worrying them profoundly.
The explosives, they believe, were detonated by mobile phone.
Prince Mohammed bin Nayef (r) was slightly injured in the attack
Peter Neuman of Kings College London says the case will be studied intensively, and that there are "tremendous implications for airport security with the potential of making it even more complicated to get on to your plane".
"If it really is true that the metal detectors couldn't detect this person's hidden explosive device, that would mean that the metal detectors as they currently exist in airports are pretty much useless," he said.
The bomber was a Saudi al-Qaeda fugitive who said he wanted to give himself up to the prince in person.
The prince took him at his word and gave him safe passage to his palace.
But there, once he got next to his target, the bomb inside him was detonated.
Miraculously the prince survived with minor injuries, but footage emerging this week shows a sizeable crater in the concrete floor and the bomber's body blown in half.
It is believed the force of the blast went downwards which is why only the bomber died.
paddy
27th September 2009, 20:33
Free prostate checks at airport security......:eek:
Not so much seconded. :-/
ManDownUnder
27th September 2009, 20:35
So let me be sure I am getting this right... a market just opened up for high explosive butt plugs?
James Deuce
27th September 2009, 20:36
Seems pointless continuing this but did you read the article you linked to Jim? The link doesn't mention "grenade". It mentions a device triggered by a mobile phone. Walk through Metal detectors can pick up hip and knee implants, hand helds are better still. Are they saying this is the first time anyone has ever thought of shoving an explosive/stripped down handgun up their arse to get through security? Someone or something fucked up. I spent three months in Jeddah last year - nothing & nobody worked quite as it should.
Quote:
Security and intelligence experts are deeply worried by a new development in suicide bombing, the BBC has learned.
It has emerged that an al-Qaeda bomber who died last month while trying to blow up a Saudi prince in Jeddah had hidden the explosives inside his body.
Only the attacker died, but it is feared that the new development could be copied by others.
Experts say it could have implications for airport security, rendering traditional metal detectors "useless".
Last month's bombing left people wondering how one of the most wanted al-Qaeda operatives in Saudi Arabia could get so close to the prince in charge of counter-terrorism that he was able to blow himself up in the same room.
Western forensic investigators think they have the answer, and it is worrying them profoundly.
The explosives, they believe, were detonated by mobile phone.
Prince Mohammed bin Nayef (r) was slightly injured in the attack
Peter Neuman of Kings College London says the case will be studied intensively, and that there are "tremendous implications for airport security with the potential of making it even more complicated to get on to your plane".
"If it really is true that the metal detectors couldn't detect this person's hidden explosive device, that would mean that the metal detectors as they currently exist in airports are pretty much useless," he said.
The bomber was a Saudi al-Qaeda fugitive who said he wanted to give himself up to the prince in person.
The prince took him at his word and gave him safe passage to his palace.
But there, once he got next to his target, the bomb inside him was detonated.
Miraculously the prince survived with minor injuries, but footage emerging this week shows a sizeable crater in the concrete floor and the bomber's body blown in half.
It is believed the force of the blast went downwards which is why only the bomber died.
Yes I did and I've subsequently investigated other articles which is where the grenade bit comes from. I may well be wrong, but at this stage it looks like it was a concussion grenade, which is why security experts are boggled. c4 with a remote controlled detonator would be the obvious choice, I agree.
Now I've travelled with metalwork in bones and it doesn't set off metal detectors at airports. The metal zips in your jacket will.
Toaster
27th September 2009, 20:39
..."Only the attacker died, but it is feared that the new development could be copied by others. "...
Especially now that it has made headline news around the world.
Wonder if the media ever questions the role they have played in copy cat type crimes.
When has anyone ever seen the media question their role? They are there to make money through sensationalism rather than reporting facts... and to self promote no matter what the effects of their reporting on anything or anyone.
The media have a lot to answer for, the sad thing is they are hard to bring to account unless its clear defamation. Apology is meaningless after the damage is done.
Toaster
27th September 2009, 20:41
So let me be sure I am getting this right... a market just opened up for high explosive butt plugs?
C4 butt plug.... great for clearing those hard ones after several days of constipation.
ManDownUnder
27th September 2009, 20:45
C4 butt plug.... great for clearing those hard ones after several days of constipation.
... or a vigorous day packing the fudge nice and tight ...?
oldrider
27th September 2009, 23:31
Read the article.
They don't. It was a grenade, not c4 and the metal detectors STILL didn't pick it up.
Maybe the "fear the story generates" is a more "explosive power" than that of the actual device! :shifty:
Hmmm, who really benefits from articles like this? :confused:
Forest
28th September 2009, 02:08
You've got to give the bomber a round of applause for his effort.
Talk about putting the fundament back into fundamentalist.
Supermac Jr
28th September 2009, 08:54
Ring-sting D e l u x
Swoop
28th September 2009, 10:40
Free prostate checks at airport security......:eek:
You can get them already.
Customs: "Anything to declare Sir?".
Passenger: "Yes. You are one really ugly fucker with the I.Q. of an ant".
Customs: "Certainly Sir. Step into this small room please...".
Mikkel
28th September 2009, 11:34
People are going to be scared as long as they insist on being afraid of dying...
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.