Ultimate 911 POLL

[Katman]

Exactly - can't be that Damning then can it?

I believe that the only reason the American government still has the 28 pages classified is that they're scared to face the myriad of questions that declassifying them will unleash.

[TheDemonLord]

I believe that the only reason the American government still has the 28 pages classified is that they're scared to face the myriad of questions that declassifying them will unleash.

Yes, You believe - that we never doubted.

If the contents were as Damning as you seem to think they are, then someone would drop the Scandal.

I suspect the contents are embarrassing, but not the smoking gun you so desperately believe it to be.

[Katman]

Yes, You believe - that we never doubted.

If the contents were as Damning as you seem to think they are, then someone would drop the Scandal.

I suspect the contents are embarrassing, but not the smoking gun you so desperately believe it to be.

You seem to forget that Congressman Thomas Massie described the 28 pages as 'shocking' and that he had to stop every couple of pages and rearrange his understanding of history.

[bogan]

You seem to forget that Congressman Thomas Massie described the 28 pages as 'shocking' and that he had to stop every couple of pages and rearrange his understanding of history.

So is it only politicians that you don't agree with that are capable of lying then?

It'll be interesting to see how many politicians pushing for the pages release go all quiet if they ever get near achieving it :laugh:

[Katman]

So is it only politicians that you don't agree with that are capable of lying then?

You see life through very simplistic eyes, don't you?

[bogan]

You see life through very simplistic eyes, don't you?

That doesn't make any sense, as I'm the one extrapolating motivation to what that bloke is saying. You're the one simplistically just going, 'yes, he says what I want to hear so it must be the absolute truth'.

[Katman]

That doesn't make any sense, as I'm the one extrapolating motivation to what that bloke is saying. You're the one simplistically just going, 'yes, he says what I want to hear so it must be the absolute truth'.

Well I guess we'll just have to wait and see then.

http://28pages.org/tag/thomas-massie/

[TheDemonLord]

You seem to forget that Congressman Thomas Massie described the 28 pages as 'shocking' and that he had to stop every couple of pages and rearrange his understanding of history.

I'm sure he did - I'm sure he garnered several thousand voters with his mock indignation.

But if it was as bad as that, he would release it, just like actual whistleblowers have done when confronted with information they know to be morally wrong to keep secret.

[Katman]

But if it was as bad as that, he would release it, just like actual whistleblowers have done when confronted with information they know to be morally wrong to keep secret.

And as I've already said, he might prefer to try getting the information released in a legal manner rather than risk losing his position as Congressman and copping a prison sentence to boot.

[TheDemonLord]

And as I've already said, he might prefer to try getting the information released in a legal manner rather than risk losing his position as Congressman and copping a prison sentence to boot.

Yep - so clearly can't be that bad then, that they aren't willing to risk the consequences.

If it was that bad - then they would.

[Katman]

Yep - so clearly can't be that bad then, that they aren't willing to risk the consequences.

Makes you wonder why the powers that be are fighting tooth and nail to keep the information classified then.

[yokel]

Yep - so clearly can't be that bad then, that they aren't willing to risk the consequences.

If it was that bad - then they would.

You are one fucking stupid ignorant moron.

The official conspiracy theory so fucking dumb, only the stupidest of cunts would still believe it after the shortcoming have been pointed out.

[TheDemonLord]

The conspiracy theory so fucking dumb, only the stupidest of cunts would still believe it after the shortcoming have been pointed out.

How right you are.....

[bogan]

Makes you wonder why the powers that be are fighting tooth and nail to keep the information classified then.

:laugh: tooth and nail? TPTB are just like, 'the fuck you up to son' to these plonkers, were any of the clue droppers even punished for leaking information about what's in the 28 pages?

[husaberg]

You seem to forget that Congressman Thomas Massie described the 28 pages as 'shocking' and that he had to stop every couple of pages and rearrange his understanding of history.



If there is so much shady dealings in the report, Why does he not have the fortitude to come forward and expose the details, he can't be prosecuted for doing so after all.


Members of the United States Congress enjoy a similar parliamentary privilege as members of the British Parliament; that is, they cannot be prosecuted for anything they say on the floor of the House or Senate.



Their report was ammended after their 'mistake' was pointed out to them.

Do you think the people at NIST tasked with producing the initial report were incompetent or were they perhaps trying to be deliberately misleading?

Do you understand what has to occur within a building structure to achieve freefall?



Then again if there was a massive cover up as you have repeatedly suggested it is. Then all the official reports into this conspiracy would be in favour of covering up the said conspiracy.
So its a bit naïve to suggest that that we should only believe parts of the official report (that haven't been released) because you feel they may suit your agenda.
When you have consistently said its a major cover up exercise.

Then again you are never consistent logical or rational when it comes to this sort of thing.

So you've found one clerical error and suddenly their stats are all bullshit?
Fuck me, who put you in charge of data analysis?

Odd that this above rational only applies where you see fit rather than to other situations.

[Katman]

If there is so much shady dealings in the report, Why does he not have the fortitude to come forward and expose the details, he can't be prosecuted for doing so after all.

(From the 28 pages website FAQs).

Q: If there are legislators who feel strongly that the 28 pages should be declassified, why don’t they read it aloud from the floor of the House or Senate under the protection of the Speech or Debate Clause?

A. First and foremost, there’s a physical impediment: While they can obtain permission to read the 28 pages in a secure facility in the basement of the Capitol, they cannot remove them from that facility and carry them to the floor. While, conceivably, a legislator could go the floor and summarize the 28 pages from memory, that legislator could lose future access to classified information, impairing their ability to represent their constituents.


Odd that this above rational only applies where you see fit rather than to other situations.

Here's the thing though shitforbrains - if the 28 pages are classified, none of us have the ability to check the veracity of their contents.

[bogan]

(From the 28 pages website FAQs).

Q: If there are legislators who feel strongly that the 28 pages should be declassified, why don’t they read it aloud from the floor of the House or Senate under the protection of the Speech or Debate Clause?

A. First and foremost, there’s a physical impediment: While they can obtain permission to read the 28 pages in a secure facility in the basement of the Capitol, they cannot remove them from that facility and carry them to the floor. While, conceivably, a legislator could go the floor and summarize the 28 pages from memory, that legislator could lose future access to classified information, impairing their ability to represent their constituents.

Fuck that's weak.


And as I've already said, he might prefer to try getting the information released in a legal manner rather than risk losing his position as Congressman and copping a prison sentence to boot.

So it is neither of those things you originally thought...

[Katman]

So it is neither of those things you originally thought...

Losing their ability to represent their constituents pretty much spells the end of their time in Congress.

Just ask Cynthia McKinney.

[bogan]

Losing their ability to represent their constituents pretty much spells the end of their time in Congress.

Just ask Cynthia McKinney.

Is she in prison, to boot?

And losing access to classified docs is not the end of one's time in congress.

[Katman]

And losing access to classified docs is not the end of one's time in congress.

Well it probably is according to those who pull the strings.

And anyhow, you're clearly not interested in what is contained in those 28 pages so I'll just assume you're only here for the arguing.

(It's either that or the insults).

[bogan]

Well it probably is according to those who pull the strings.

And anyhow, you're clearly not interested in what is contained in those 28 pages so I'll just assume you're only here for the arguing.

(It's either that or the insults).

Indeed, just like you're clearly not here to debate the topic either. I just find it amusing watching how convoluted your self delusions get to sustain your biased way of thinking.

Cos let's face it, if you've come here cos you're interested in what is in those 28 pages, you're in the wrong place :killingme

[Katman]

Cos let's face it, if you've come here cos you're interested in what is in those 28 pages, you're in the wrong place :killingme

The thread's not called 'The 28 pages'.

Shitforbrains.

[Woodman]

Well it probably is according to those who pull the strings.

And anyhow, you're clearly not interested in what is contained in those 28 pages so I'll just assume you're only here for the arguing.

(It's either that or the insults).

Really? Do you honestly think anyone comes on here for anything but the arguing and insults? Its certainly not for intelligent informative discussion.

[Katman]

Really? Do you honestly think anyone comes on here for anything but the arguing and insults? Its certainly not for intelligent informative discussion.

Well that's ok - as long as you're happy.

(Bogan must be almost gagging for some moderator cock by now though).

[bogan]

The thread's not called 'The 28 pages'.

Don't blame me for that shit, you brought them up :facepalm:

Speaking of the thread topic, 80% think it happened (on the day) as per the story. So where does that leave your pixie dust theories :killingme

[bogan]

Well that's ok - as long as you're happy.

(Bogan must be almost gagging for some moderator cock by now though).

You were the one whinging about mods to clean up some shit the other day, and you clearly have cocks on the brain... gotta be some sort of theory in that.

[Katman]

Speaking of the thread topic, 80% think it happened (on the day) as per the story.

How do you work that one out then?

[Woodman]

Well that's ok - as long as you're happy.

(Bogan must be almost gagging for some moderator cock by now though).

Always happy, Cognitive dissonance is a good thing.

[husaberg]

(From the 28 pages website FAQs).

Q: If there are legislators who feel strongly that the 28 pages should be declassified, why don’t they read it aloud from the floor of the House or Senate under the protection of the Speech or Debate Clause?

A. First and foremost, there’s a physical impediment: While they can obtain permission to read the 28 pages in a secure facility in the basement of the Capitol, they cannot remove them from that facility and carry them to the floor. While, conceivably, a legislator could go the floor and summarize the 28 pages from memory, that legislator could lose future access to classified information, impairing their ability to represent their constituents.



Here's the thing though shitforbrains - if the 28 pages are classified, none of us have the ability to check the veracity of their contents.
Bullshit again heaps of people know what is in the classified sections of report, not just the one Congressman.
How many others are trying to get political mileage out of it.......
I also call Bullshit on your other theory expressed, unless he a goldfish he can remember important details of what is in the 28 pages that have not been released
As you said the Congressman had said reading the 28 pages made him rethink the whole of what he already knew already abouty 911
So unless he had a massive report (he took in there) stating all what he already knew prior to reading the report. Your new theory is again Katcrap.
Or is it he more likely that unlike you and has a brain that can recall details things and relay them later.
He seems to recall the details at every interview he holds. Yet he has no legal reason not to say them.


And as I've already said, he might prefer to try getting the information released in a legal manner rather than risk losing his position as Congressman and copping a prison sentence to boot.

Members of the United States Congress enjoy a similar parliamentary privilege as members of the British Parliament; that is, they cannot be prosecuted for anything they say on the floor of the House or Senate.
There is no legal reason like you tried to say there was aye, which makes you the shitforbrains. (We all already knew this ofcourse)

[bogan]

How do you work that one out then?

I can add numbers larger than the number of fingers and toes that I have.

[Katman]

I can add numbers larger than the number of fingers and toes that I have.

So you're good past 24 then?

[Katman]

I call Bullshit

Yeah, I noticed you'd arrived.

[bogan]

So you're good past 24 then?

Weak.

Extra weak since obviously that is the case, evidenced in the post we were just discussing.

Anyway, it looks like you've retreated to beige insults and the selective quoting crutch so they can make it to weak status to begin with. My work here (showing you for what you are) is done :sunny:

[Katman]

My work here (showing you for what you are) is done :sunny:

I'm sure you'll be back.

[yokel]

Don't blame me for that shit, you brought them up :facepalm:

Speaking of the thread topic, 80% think it happened (on the day) as per the story. So where does that leave your pixie dust theories :killingme

So if 80% of people think the world is flat then anything else is pixie dust right??
Nice one ya dumb cunt.

Truth is not a popularity contest.

[bogan]

So if 80% of people think the world is flat then anything else is pixie dust right??
Nice one ya dumb cunt.

Truth is not a popularity contest.

Popularity is its symptom though.

[Katman]

I can add numbers larger than the number of fingers and toes that I have.

Right, so you think the 'They knew it was coming....' option is supporting your vote?

Cos I read that option sort of like 'they knew the attack was coming and let it happen so they could invade Iraq - and wired the buildings for demolition as well just so there was no risk of it being not quite a big enough Pearl Harbour'.

[bogan]

Right, so you think the 'They knew if was coming' option is supporting your vote?

Cos I read that option sort of like 'they knew the attack was coming and let it happen so they could invade Iraq - and wired the buildings for demolition as well just so there was no risk of it being not quite a big enough Pearl Harbour'.

There we go, it took him a while but he finally figured out how to add :laugh:

Of course it supports the on the day happenings as per the story. How could it not?

[Katman]

Of course it supports the on the day happenings as per the story. How could it not?

Because that's the option I voted for.

[TheDemonLord]

So you're good past 24 then?

You must be a n00b - I can count to 32 on one hand, 1024 on 2, and if we bring toes into it we can go all the way up to 1,048,576

[Katman]

You must be a n00b - I can count to 32 on one hand, 1024 on 2, and if we bring toes into it we can go all the way up to 1,048,576

I can actually count further than that in my head.

[bogan]

Because that's the option I voted for.

That's nice dear.

[Katman]

That's nice dear.

I'm sorry, don't I fit your data?

[bogan]

I'm sorry, don't I fit your data?

You fail to fit your own I'm afraid.

Explosives and pixie dust fit with an inside (or wizard) job, not simply one they knew about and let happen.

[FJRider]

I'm sorry, don't I fit your data?

Do what you usually do ... find data that fits ... or just make something up.

[Katman]

You fail to fit your own I'm afraid.

Explosives and pixie dust fit with an inside (or wizard) job, not simply one they knew about and let happen.

Hey, maybe the American government only knew about an impending attack. Maybe Larry Silverstein offered up a couple of sacrificial lambs. Maybe he made sure that he was adequately protected in the event that the buildings came down. Maybe that was a twist that not even those with prior knowledge of the attack knew about.

(Just thinking out loud).

[bogan]

Hey, maybe the American government only knew about an impending attack. Maybe Larry Silverstein offered up a couple of sacrificial lambs. Maybe he made sure that he was adequately protected in the event that the buildings came down. Maybe that was a twist that not even those with prior knowledge of the attack knew about.

(Just thinking out loud).

Maybe that doesn't fit with explosives and pixie dust either.

[yokel]

You fail to fit your own I'm afraid.

Explosives and pixie dust fit with an inside (or wizard) job, not simply one they knew about and let happen.

Adding pixie dust and wizardry to the official conspiracy theory would go a long way to making it sound possible.

[Katman]

Maybe that doesn't fit with explosives and pixie dust either.

Well I bet Larry would have been right fucked off if he'd had to repair the white elephants.

[bogan]

Adding pixie dust and wizardry to the official conspiracy theory would go a long way to making it sound possible.

How?


Well I bet Larry would have been right fucked off if he'd had to repair the white elephants.

and?

[Katman]

and?

Fuck's sake - you have to be spoon fed, don't you?

If he was offering up a couple of sacrificial lambs he sure as fuck wouldn't want them to end up being an even bigger problem on 10/11.

[yokel]

Well I bet Larry would have been right fucked off if he'd had to repair the white elephants.

I remember lucky Larry saying "we made the decision to pull it" you don't use "it" when referring to people, so he's full of shit

[bogan]

Fuck's sake - you have to be spoon fed, don't you?

If he was offering up a couple of sacrificial lambs he sure as fuck wouldn't want them to end up being an even bigger problem on 10/11.

With your delusional theories completely lacking in logic, of course you have to thoroughly explain it. It makes it interesting to watch you come to the obvious realisations only as you have to do so.

Yeh that theory is going to take more than 28 pages :laugh: :killingme

[yokel]

With your delusional theories completely lacking in logic, of course you have to thoroughly explain it. It makes it interesting to watch you come to the obvious realisations only as you have to do so.

Yeh that theory is going to take more than 28 pages :laugh: :killingme

Hey just for fun, lets hear the delusional logic behind the official conspiracy theory??

[husaberg]

I remember lucky Larry saying "we made the decision to pull it" you don't use "it" when referring to people, so he's full of shit
Fail...............
So when doctors are referring to an operation on a person they never say it went well.
Funny enough that is exactly also what Larry said he was referring to when he said pull it but it this case it was a firefighting operation.
Funnily enough he was of course talking to the fire deppartment at the time.

The documentary was made infamous for one comment made by Larry Silverstein on the subject of 9/11. Silverstein states, "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse

[yokel]

Fail...............
So when doctors are referring to an operation on a person they never say it went well.
Funny enough that is exactly also what Larry said he was referring to but it this case it was a firefighting operation.

Fail..........
The operation is done on a person, it's not a person you dumb fuck,

I know you have to believe in the official conspiracy theory no matter what, until you're told otherwise.

[husaberg]

Fail..........
The operation is done on a person, it's not a person you dumb fuck,

I know you have to believe in the official conspiracy theory no matter what, until you're told otherwise.
thats epic............
Fail, both the fire fighting opperation and the sugical operation is performed by people. it is the operation........
The only reason any of this is even in discussion is that larry actually said he had this discussion with the fire department.
Its only the conspiracy idiots that think it must mean something else, only they claim not to believe a word he says....... only what they think they he meant, based on what he said.
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/j2q2mD2HaKA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

[Katman]

Fail..........
The operation is done on a person, it's not a person you dumb fuck,

I know you have to believe in the official conspiracy theory no matter what, until you're told otherwise.


thats epic............
Fail, both the fire fighting opperation and the sugical operation is performed by people. it is the operation........

Fuck, you dudes are as bad as each other.

[yokel]

thats epic............
Fail, both the fire fighting opperation and the sugical operation is performed by people. it is the operation........

Supper massive epic fail...........

OMG the hospital is on fire, we need to pull THEM out.

Like I said you'll believe any old shit that backs the official conspiracy theory.

Larry said to "pull it" and the building collapsed at free fall acceleration.

[husaberg]

Fuck, you dudes are as bad as each other.

Only thing is Yokel often takes you up on the offer to suck your cock.
Plus Yokel adequately reflects the intelligence levels of the conspiracy theory disciples
So how are you getting on answering the questions about the congressman Champ......


(From the 28 pages website FAQs).

Q: If there are legislators who feel strongly that the 28 pages should be declassified, why don’t they read it aloud from the floor of the House or Senate under the protection of the Speech or Debate Clause?

A. First and foremost, there’s a physical impediment: While they can obtain permission to read the 28 pages in a secure facility in the basement of the Capitol, they cannot remove them from that facility and carry them to the floor. While, conceivably, a legislator could go the floor and summarize the 28 pages from memory, that legislator could lose future access to classified information, impairing their ability to represent their constituents.



Here's the thing though shitforbrains - if the 28 pages are classified, none of us have the ability to check the veracity of their contents.
Bullshit again heaps of people know what is in the classified sections of report, not just the one Congressman.
How many others are trying to get political mileage out of it.......
I also call Bullshit on your other theory expressed, unless he a goldfish he can remember important details of what is in the 28 pages that have not been released
As you said the Congressman had said reading the 28 pages made him rethink the whole of what he already knew already abouty 911
So unless he had a massive report (he took in there) stating all what he already knew prior to reading the report? Your new theory is again Katcrap isn't it?.
Or is it he more likely that unlike you and has a brain that can recall details things and relay them later?
He seems to recall the details at every interview he holds. Therefor he has no legal reason not to say them?


And as I've already said, he might prefer to try getting the information released in a legal manner rather than risk losing his position as Congressman and copping a prison sentence to boot.

Members of the United States Congress enjoy a similar parliamentary privilege as members of the British Parliament; that is, they cannot be prosecuted for anything they say on the floor of the House or Senate.
There is no legal reason like you tried to say there was aye?, which makes you the shitforbrains? (We all already knew this of course)






Supper massive epic fail...........

OMG the hospital is on fire, we need to pull THEM out.

Like I said you'll believe any old shit that backs the official conspiracy theory.

Larry said to "pull it" and the building collapsed at free fall acceleration.

Event The hospital is on fire so they called the surgical operations off and evacuated the building.

Reporter to hospital administrator "were there any operations happening at the time of the fire? " "Yes but we called it off"

[Woodman]

I remember lucky Larry saying "we made the decision to pull it" you don't use "it" when referring to people, so he's full of shit

So the reason you believe that wtc7 was an inside job is because of grammar.

Mind you grammar has been involved in deceptions before e.g.


My Grammar what big eyes you have!

All the better for seeing you with!

My Grammar what big teeth you have!

All the better for eating you up.

There are probarbly others too.

[yokel]

Only thing is Yokel often takes you up on the offer to suck your cock.
Plus Yokel adequately reflects the intelligence levels of the conspiracy theory disciples
So how are you getting on answering the questions about the congressman Champ......


Bullshit again heaps of people know what is in the classified sections of report, not just the one Congressman.
How many others are trying to get political mileage out of it.......
I also call Bullshit on your other theory expressed, unless he a goldfish he can remember important details of what is in the 28 pages that have not been released
As you said the Congressman had said reading the 28 pages made him rethink the whole of what he already knew already abouty 911
So unless he had a massive report (he took in there) stating all what he already knew prior to reading the report? Your new theory is again Katcrap isn't it?.
Or is it he more likely that unlike you and has a brain that can recall details things and relay them later?
He seems to recall the details at every interview he holds. Therefor he has no legal reason not to say them?



There is no legal reason like you tried to say there was aye?, which makes you the shitforbrains? (We all already knew this of course)







Event The hospital is on fire so they called the surgical operations off and evacuated the building.

Reporter to hospital administrator were there any operations happing at the time of the fire "Yes but we called it off"

So what's your definition of bullshit?

“He said, ‘Did you realize there’s 28 pages of the 9/11 report that never been released, but as a congressman, you can go read them in a secret room?’,” Massie recalled on The Tyler Cralle Show (audio below).

His curiosity piqued, the MIT grad obtained permission to read the 28 pages and proceeded to a secure, soundproof facility in the basement of the Capitol where he read them under close observation and without the option of taking notes or bringing anyone from his staff.

Massie was surprised by what he found, telling host Tyler Cralle, “They’re the most consequential pages in the thousand-page report.” At a 2014 press conference, Massie said the experience was “shocking,” and that he had to “stop every couple pages and try to rearrange my understanding of history.”

does "bullshit" require a secret sound prof room?

[husaberg]

So what's your definition of bullshit?

“He said, ‘Did you realize there’s 28 pages of the 9/11 report that never been released, but as a congressman, you can go read them in a secret room?’,” Massie recalled on The Tyler Cralle Show (audio below).

His curiosity piqued, the MIT grad obtained permission to read the 28 pages and proceeded to a secure, soundproof facility in the basement of the Capitol where he read them under close observation and without the option of taking notes or bringing anyone from his staff.

Massie was surprised by what he found, telling host Tyler Cralle, “They’re the most consequential pages in the thousand-page report.” At a 2014 press conference, Massie said the experience was “shocking,” and that he had to “stop every couple pages and try to rearrange my understanding of history.”

does "bullshit" require a secret sound prof room?

Nice try to change the subject, but Is it the room the report or the alleged the conspiracy because they all would involve people.

[yokel]

Nice try to change the subject, but Is it the room the report or the alleged the conspiracy because they all would involve people.

Ok let get back to the subject that you're stupid cunt,

Do know what a freudian slip is?


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/LXDMIVYbJgs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

[husaberg]

Ok let get back to the subject that you're stupid cunt,

Do know what a freudian slip is?



Nice try to change the subject, but Is it the room the report or the alleged the conspiracy because they all would involve people.?

[yokel]

Nice try to change the subject, but Is it the room the report or the alleged the conspiracy because they all would involve people.?

Why do you believe the official conspiracy theory??

[yokel]

Good old lucky Larry,

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/14GQsLbzvkY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

[husaberg]

Why do you believe the official conspiracy theory??


Nice try to change the subject, but Is it the room?, the report?, or the alleged conspiracy? because they all would involve people.?

If you can't answer the questions, just admit defeat.

[Berries]

Fuck this thread has gone downhill. I am almost tempted to vote for the Arab termites.

[jasonu]

Well that's ok - as long as you're happy.

(Bogan must be almost gagging for some moderator cock by now though).

When cornered you always resort to some sort of penis related comment, insult or offer.

[Katman]

Good old lucky Larry,

Phew, that was a relief.

Imagine if poor old Larry had got caught up in the whole affair.

Who would have been left to claim all those billions?

[yokel]

If you can't answer the questions, just admit defeat.

Quite simply "Pull" is the method of demolition and the "it" is the building.

Now, some how people knew the building was going to come down.

But like I said you will believe any nonsense that backs the official conspiracy theory, while ignoring everything to the contrary.
Eg, freefall, bone fragments, pulverised concrete, eyewitness accounts of explosion, plane speeds, the money trail, motives and the list goes on and on.

How about that gash in the bankers trust building that you thought was building 7??
funny thing is the bankers trust building did not collapse, even though it was closer to "ground zero" than Building 7.

http://www.debunking911.com/fig-1-7.jpg

[yokel]

Phew, that was a relief.

Imagine if poor old Larry had got caught up in the whole affair.

Who would have been left to claim all those billions?

Hey, when the wife tells you that you must keep your appointment to see your dermatologist, how can you argue with that?

what a rock solid alibi haha

[husaberg]

Quite simply "Pull" is the method of demolition and the "it" is the building.

It is you that is quite simple.

Fail...............
So when doctors are referring to an operation on a person they never say it went well.
Funny enough that is exactly also what Larry said he was referring to when he said pull it but it this case it was a firefighting operation.
Funnily enough he was of course talking to the fire deppartment at the time.


The documentary was made infamous for one comment made by Larry Silverstein on the subject of 9/11. Silverstein states, "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse



thats epic............
Fail, both the fire fighting opperation and the sugical operation is performed by people. it is the operation........
The only reason any of this is even in discussion is that larry actually said he had this discussion with the fire department.
Its only the conspiracy idiots that think it must mean something else, only they claim not to believe a word he says....... only what they think they he meant, based on what he said.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/j2q2mD2HaKA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Nice try to change the subject, but Is it the room?, the report?, or the alleged conspiracy? because they all would involve people.?
Reply from yokel change of subject

Nice try to change the subject, but Is it the room?, the report?, or the alleged conspiracy? because they all would involve people.?
Reply from yokel change of subject

Nice try to change the subject, but Is it the room?, the report?, or the alleged conspiracy? because they all would involve people.?
Reply from yokel change of subject
If you can't answer the questions, just admit defeat.

[oldrider]

https://theintercept.com/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/

[Katman]

It is you that is quite simple.

Reply from yokel change of subject

Reply from yokel change of subject

Reply from yokel change of subject
If you can't answer the questions, just admit defeat.

Seriously man, you are fucked in the head.

[husaberg]

Seriously man, you are fucked in the head.
Nice attempt at trolling..........
Seriously no one takes your theories seriously.... seriously Am I the one trolling on KB constantly, Am I the one drunkenly asking random guys to suck their cocks?
Save yourself a bit of time from now on, The only one Muppet on here that is a sucker for your cock and ball story's is your retarded mate Yokel....
I asked you a while back how long you could go without preaching your conspiracy religion on KB, you went all quiet.... it seems that you can only go for about 5 days without a repeated spouting of your next conspiracy
Even the Mormons and the JW's only bother people with their religion once of twice a year.
No one takes any of your conspiracy theories seriously, that's why you get so angry when anyone asks for actual evidence.........
If I haven't made my point clear, you are a joke, your conspiracy theories are a joke. Only no one is laughing with you, only at you.


Hey, maybe the American government only knew about an impending attack. Maybe Larry Silverstein offered up a couple of sacrificial lambs. Maybe he made sure that he was adequately protected in the event that the buildings came down. Maybe that was a twist that not even those with prior knowledge of the attack knew about.

(Just thinking out loud).

Maybe you are not thinking at all. Maybe that's just you preaching you shitty religion...........

[yokel]

The official conspiracy theory's "scientist" vs an actual scientist.
Things are getting interesting.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/FzF1KySHmUA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/apmiEzx4CkE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

[Woodman]

Nice attempt at trolling..........
Seriously no one takes your theories seriously.... seriously Am I the one trolling on KB constantly, Am I the one drunkenly asking random guys to suck their cocks?
Save yourself a bit of time from now on, The only one Muppet on here that is a sucker for your cock and ball storys that's you retarded mate Yokel....
I asked you a while back how long you could go without preaching your conspiracy religion on KB, you went all quiet.... it seems that you can only go for about 5 days without a repeated spouting of your next conspiracy
Even the Mormons and the JW's only bother people with their religion once of twice a year.
No one takes any of your conspiracy theories seriously, that's why you get so angry when anyone asks for actual evidence.........
If I haven't made my point clear, you are a joke, your conspiracy theories are a joke. Only no one is laughing with you, only at you.



Maybe you are not thinking at all. Maybe that's just you preaching you shitty religion...........

Chill man, we are all just here for a bit of fun......

[Katman]

Chill man, we are all just here for a bit of fun......

Shut up man.

My fun is watching him pop a blood vessel.

[Akzle]

Shut up man.

My fun is watching him pop a blood vessel.

the only one'll pop will be one in his knob if he keeps abusing it like that.

[husaberg]

Shut up man.

My fun is watching him pop a blood vessel.

Which is exactly the reason why you are a pathetic troll
Its the only way you have of gaining attention, your life revolves around it.

http://blog.al.com/wire/2014/02/study_finds_internet_trolls_su.html

[Katman]

The official conspiracy theory's "scientist" vs an actual scientist.
Things are getting interesting.


Nice find.

I'll be following the progress of that WTC7 project avidly.

[Akzle]

I asked you a while back how long you could go without preaching your conspiracy religion on KB, you went all quiet.... it seems that you can only go for about 5 days


like that time i bet you couldnt shut the fuck up for a week? But you failed.

...Or that time i bet you couldnt devote a large part of 3 months to repping me every day...

//o. Wait on.

[husaberg]

like that time i bet you couldnt shut the fuck up for a week? But you failed.

...Or that time i bet you couldnt devote a large part of 3 months to repping me every day...

//o. Wait on.

Sorry does the narcissist feel he's not getting enough attention.
You asked oh no.......should I listen to all the non motorbike owning trolls on KB? or just you?........
Maybe you should start another few threads about how you are picked on.............
Maybe you could send some PM's to more people saying you would like to rape their children, Maybe that will make you feel better................
Honestly just how many people have you sent those to now?
Does that make you feel all special inside to do it?

[Akzle]

Sorry does the narcissist feel he's not getting enough attention.
You asked oh no.......should I listen to all the non motorbike owning trolls on KB? or just you?........
Maybe you should start another few threads about how you are picked on.............
Maybe you could send some PM's to more people saying you would like to rape their children, Maybe that will make you feel better................
Honestly just how many people have you sent those to now?
Does that make you feel all special inside to do it?

haha. Its funny because....

//wait. No. You're still lame, and my bitch.

[husaberg]

haha. Its funny because....

//wait. No. You're still lame, and my bitch.



Funny because a bitch would follow someone arround Axheel
Have a look at your posts in this thread and answer just how many are about me or to me and have nothing to do with the thread......:laugh:
So just how many people have you sent messages to about rapping children this week?
It a very odd comment for someone that has children to repeatidly make to people.........

[Woodman]

So just how many people have you sent messages to about rapping children?


https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRhqdB5bv3X-9Tv4TKjjDUBquXUy_9d_lCaGUQVCqGw_eBgppvlcg

[Madness]

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/4Hi2cTlz4Gs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Quite fitting I thought.

[oldrider]

Opulence abounds in black America going by that clip. - Hmmmm what sort of car was that woman cleaning? :confused:

[Akzle]

Opulence abounds in black America going by that clip. - Hmmmm what sort of car was that woman cleaning? :confused:

what car ?

[Akzle]

Funny because a bitch would follow someone arround Axheel
Have a look at your posts in this thread and answer just how many are about me or to me and have nothing to do with the thread......:laugh:
So just how many people have you sent messages to about rapping children this week?
It a very odd comment for someone that has children to repeatidly make to people.........

again. With the superlative iron.

Have you thought, lately?




/about killing yourself?
Seriously. Human carcasses are pretty feeble.

And i imagine, spending so much time in your mums basement yours is weaker yet, just... Get in a hot bath. You're probably too much of a bitch to cut your throat so just take the toaster with you. I'll even get a sparkie to come over and disconnect your breakers and earthing, for maxinum lulz.

[husaberg]

again. With the superlative iron.

Have you thought, lately?/about killing yourself?
Seriously. Human carcasses are pretty feeble.

And i imagine, spending so much time in your mums basement yours is weaker yet, just... Get in a hot bath. You're probably too much of a bitch to cut your throat so just take the toaster with you. I'll even get a sparkie to come over and disconnect your breakers and earthing, for maxinum lulz.

None of this answers the questions... your posts in this thread and answer just how many are about me or to me and have nothing to do with the thread?
So just how many people have you sent messages to about rapping children this week?
It a very odd comment for someone that has children to repeatedly make to people.........
Maybe you can explain on a open forum how child rape is somehow funny rather than just sending messages to people on the forum about it?

[Akzle]

None of this answers the questions... your posts in this thread and answer just how many are about me or to me and have nothing to do with the thread?
So just how many people have you sent messages to about rapping children this week?
It a very odd comment for someone that has children to repeatedly make to people.........
Maybe you can explain on a open forum how child rape is somehow funny rather than just sending messages to people on the forum about it?

seriously. Kill yourself.

[husaberg]

seriously. Kill yourself.

Why's does necrophilia excite you nearly as much as child rape does.

[yokel]

Nice find.

I'll be following the progress of that WTC7 project avidly.

Yes, at the risk of sounding like a biased cunt we pretty much know what the results are going to be.
and it's not going to be office fires that's for sure.

No doubt the results will fall on deaf ears.

More on the project.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/uW4Z3P8BER0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

[Katman]

No doubt the results will fall on deaf ears.

I hope bogan and thedemonlard have the integrity to follow the progress of the project with an open mind.

Somehow I doubt it though.

[TheDemonLord]

I hope bogan and thedemonlard have the integrity to follow the progress of the project with an open mind.

Somehow I doubt it though.

This would be a project headed by the same Niels Harrit that published the non-peer reviewed paper on Nano-Thermite in a 'science' publication that was proven to not actually peer review its content? The Same one that tried to sue a Newspaper for calling him a Crackpot and lost?

I looked up Niels Harrit with an open mind - but it would seem he has already poisoned his own Well.

[husaberg]

This would be a project headed by the same Niels Harrit that published the non-peer reviewed paper on Nano-Thermite in a 'science' publication that was proven to not actually peer review its content? The Same one that tried to sue a Newspaper for calling him a Crackpot and lost?

I looked up Niels Harrit with an open mind - but it would seem he has already poisoned his own Well.

So that's the same Niels Harrit that claims he wants freedom to express his views in the media and then tries to sue a paper and loses when they express their own of his Crackpot theories.;)

[Voltaire]

Americans have moved on in the last ...whatever years.... Donald Trump is the future now.... :innocent:

[Katman]

This would be a project headed by the same Niels Harrit that published the non-peer reviewed paper on Nano-Thermite in a 'science' publication that was proven to not actually peer review its content? The Same one that tried to sue a Newspaper for calling him a Crackpot and lost?

I looked up Niels Harrit with an open mind - but it would seem he has already poisoned his own Well.

Your predictability is exceeded only by your incredible stupidity.

Both videos made it abundantly clear that the project is headed by a Dr Hulsey of the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

Why do you continue to make a fool of yourself by arguing from a position of total ignorance?

[oldrider]

Americans have moved on in the last ...whatever years.... Donald Trump is the future now.... :innocent:

Donald Trump has well and truly sucked up and declared his allegiance and dedication to all things AIPAC and Israel first or he would have been toast by now!

Link: http://forward.com/news/breaking-news/318770/trumps-strong-jewish-ties/

Link: http://beforeitsnews.com/blogging-citizen-journalism/2015/07/donald-trump-wait-till-you-find-out-who-is-behind-him-2517032.html

[yokel]

This would be a project headed by the same Niels Harrit that published the non-peer reviewed paper on Nano-Thermite in a 'science' publication that was proven to not actually peer review its content? The Same one that tried to sue a Newspaper for calling him a Crackpot and lost?

I looked up Niels Harrit with an open mind - but it would seem he has already poisoned his own Well.

Discrediting the facts presented = strong argument

Discrediting the presenter of the facts = weak minded bitch of an argument.

Where are the "peer reviews" on the official conspiracy theories explanations on how build 7 and the towers collapsed?


So that's the same Niels Harrit that claims he wants freedom to express his views in the media and then tries to sue a paper and loses when they express their own of his Crackpot theories.;)

So when some news paper says a professor is a "Crackpot" it must be true? You are one dumb cunt.

Like I said you'll believe any nonsenses that backs up the OCT.

[husaberg]

Discrediting the facts presented = strong argument

Discrediting the presenter of the facts = weak minded bitch of an argument.

Where are the "peer reviews" on the official conspiracy theories explanations on how build 7 and the towers collapsed?



So when some news paper says a professor is a "Crackpot" it must be true? You are one dumb cunt.

Like I said you'll believe any nonsenses that backs up the OCT.

Lets see it was proven in Court that the media is allowed to call him a crackpot because he is one vs KB conspiracy idiots opinion (one that has been proven to be both dim witted and illogical)................. :laugh:

Are you unable to comprehend when a person falsely presents information as being peer reviewed he has no credibility at all in scientific circles.
So when this same person is then used to front a campaign his lack of credibility follows............
As much as Katman is trying to distance Niels Harrit from the campaign he is fronting it.

[yokel]

Lets see it was proven in Court that the media is allowed to call him a crackpot because he is one vs a well proven KB conspiracy idiots opinion ................. :laugh:

Lots of things are "proven" in Court, that does not mean it is true or right ya stupid fuck.

Like I said you'll believe any nonsenses that backs up the OCT.

[yokel]

This sums up the official fairy tail of 9/11.

Fuck the human race is bunch of stupid gullible idiots.

https://youtu.be/9mgMQBppiVk?t=4m29s

[Katman]

Lets see it was proven in Court that the media is allowed to call him a crackpot because he is one vs KB conspiracy idiots opinion (one that has been proven to be both dim witted and illogical).................

As much as Katman is trying to distance Niels Harrit from the campaign he is fronting it.

Fuck off shitforbrains, Niels Harrit is simply endorsing the project.

His libel case did nothing to discredit him as a scientist.

(Actually, has anyone got any information on the verdict to his High Court appeal? I don't seem to be able to find anything).

[husaberg]

Fuck off shitforbrains, Niels Harrit is simply endorsing the project.

His libel case did nothing to discredit him as a scientist.

(Actually, has anyone got any information on the verdict to his High Court appeal? I don't seem to be able to find anything).

He is fronting the campaign that is why he is on the front of the videos.(its his name being used to promote it)
Even you tacitly admit has no credibility that's why all of a sudden you are now trying to distance him from the campaign.


Your predictability is exceeded only by your incredible stupidity.

Both videos made it abundantly clear that the project is headed by a Dr Hulsey of the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

Why do you continue to make a fool of yourself by arguing from a position of total ignorance?
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/uW4Z3P8BER0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
whose name is at the front of the video...............
The Crackpot professor made a fool of himself in court


Niels Harrit had called professor of theoretical physics Per Hedegård from the University of Copenhagen's Niels Bohr Institute as a witness on his own behalf.
Hedegård's testimony appeared not to support Niels Harrit's claim that WTC7 could not have been a free fall but a controlled explosion.

He even implied that the speed of the building's collapse could theoretically be above free fall due to the complex nature of the energy waves, undermining the clear-cut nature of Niels Harrit's argument. All in all, his testimony did not appear to support Niels Harrit:http://universitypost.dk/article/courtroom-drama-911-crackpot-libel-case
His own words the court ruled it acceptable for reporters to call him a crackpot along with other religious and holocaust denying crackpots.

Members of the 9/11 Truth Movement and I, by name, were held up as prototypes for “madness,” together with Holocaust deniers and anti-Darwinists, and were called “crackpots” along the way. The High Court ruled that these smears were acceptable!Niels Harrit https://www.facebook.com/Niels.Harrit.appreciation.society/posts/10153187683684154

[Katman]

Even you tacitly admit has no credibility that's why all of a sudden you are now trying to distance him from the campaign.

I have no reason whatsoever to question Niels Harrit's credibility as a scientist.

The fact that you're attempting to do so, in the total absence of evidence to that effect, demonstrates your desperation.

Now fuck off and choke on a turkey bone.

[husaberg]

I have no reason whatsoever to question Niels Harrit's credibility as a scientist.

The fact that you're attempting to do so, in the total absence of evidence to that effect, demonstrates your desperation.

Now fuck off and choke on a turkey bone.

Yet the very scientist Niels Harrit's called to testify for him at his libel case provided evidence and testimony that not only did not support him, it backfired and made him look stupid and ill prepared and a total idiot for calling him in the first place.
I provided the report of the case and I also provided what Niels Harrit's had said the verdict was and you try and say there is no evidence of the courts ruling.
You claimed you could find nothing on the ruling.

Niels Harrit had called professor of theoretical physics Per Hedegård from the University of Copenhagen's Niels Bohr Institute as a witness on his own behalf. Hedegård's testimony appeared not to support Niels Harrit's claim that WTC7 could not have been a free fall but a controlled explosion.

He even implied that the speed of the building's collapse could theoretically be above free fall due to the complex nature of the energy waves, undermining the clear-cut nature of Niels Harrit's argument. All in all, his testimony did not appear to support Niels Harrit:http://universitypost.dk/article/courtroom-drama-911-crackpot-libel-case
His own words the court ruled it acceptable for reporters to call him a crackpot along with other religious and holocaust denying crackpots.

Members of the 9/11 Truth Movement and I, by name, were held up as prototypes for “madness,” together with Holocaust deniers and anti-Darwinists, and were called “crackpots” along the way. The High Court ruled that these smears were acceptable!Niels Harrit https://www.facebook.com/Niels.Harrit.appreciation.society/posts/10153187683684154

[Katman]

I provided the report and I also provided what Niels Harrit's had said the verdict was and you try and say there is no evidence of the courts ruling.

The High Court's verdict simply upheld an earlier ruling that, due to freedom of speech, reporters can call people anything they like - nothing more, nothing less.

[husaberg]

The High Court's verdict simply upheld an earlier ruling that, due to freedom of speech, reporters can call people anything they like - nothing more, nothing less.
Niels Harrits own words

Members of the 9/11 Truth Movement and I, by name, were held up as prototypes for “madness,” together with Holocaust deniers and anti-Darwinists, and were called “crackpots” along the way. The High Court ruled that these smears were acceptable! Niels Harrit https://www.facebook.com/Niels.Harri...53187683684154

They are allowed to call him a crackpot as the evidence he presented proved he was one.
Under Danish libel law, Villemoes (the reporter who called him a crackpot) had the burden of demonstrating a factual basis for his claim that Niels Harrit is a crackpot. He did

[Katman]

Niels Harrits own words

Did you notice his use of the exclamation mark?

What do you think that signifies, shitforbrains?

[husaberg]

Did you notice his use of the exclamation mark?

What do you think that signifies, shitforbrains?

His own words on the ruling it does not change the ruling though, he said it himself.

Members of the 9/11 Truth Movement and I, by name, were held up as prototypes for “madness,” together with Holocaust deniers and anti-Darwinists, and were called “crackpots” along the way. The High Court ruled that these smears were acceptable! Niels Harrit

Danish law.
Under Danish libel law, Villemoes (the reporter who called him a crackpot) had the burden of demonstrating a factual basis for his claim that Niels Harrit is a crackpot. He did
This is a fact. Unless you can provide this is not the case I would suggest you stop trying to make out this never occurred.
Also I love how you think continually insulting me makes your case look less piss weak.:laugh:
Poor troll

[Katman]

I will admit that taking a libel case against a reporter for calling him a 'crackpot' is rather a boganesque move, but in Niels Harrit's own words "Yes, we lost a small battle - but we advanced the cause of 9/11 Truth in the process".

[yokel]

Did you notice his use of the exclamation mark?

What do you think that signifies, shitforbrains?

It's funny how these stupid cunts can't produce any verifiable facts that back up the OCT,
Instead resort to calling a professor a "crackpot" and just talking nonsense.

Trying desperately to hold on to their delusional beliefs.

The laws of physics trumps any courts ruling.

Only fools will refuse to believe that they have indeed been fooled.

[yokel]

His own words on the ruling it does not change the ruling though, he said it himself.


Danish law.
Under Danish libel law, Villemoes (the reporter who called him a crackpot) had the burden of demonstrating a factual basis for his claim that Niels Harrit is a crackpot. He did
This is a fact. Unless you can provide this is not the case I would suggest you stop trying to make out this never occurred.
Also I love how you think continually insulting me makes your case look less piss weak.:laugh:
Poor troll

Is "crackpot" a factual term??

Like I said you'll believe any nonsense that backs up the OCT

[husaberg]

It's funny how these stupid cunts can't produce any verifiable facts that back up the 911 conspiracy theory
Instead resort to getting a "crackpot" professor and just talking nonsense.

Trying desperately to hold on to their delusional beliefs.
Evidence and The laws of physics trumps any conspiracy theory.

Only fools will refuse to believe that they have indeed been fooled.

Likely the most incisive comment you have ever made.;)

Is "crackpot" a factual term??

Like I said you'll believe any nonsense that backs up the OCT
The professor case proves you are one as well.
Members of the 9/11 Truth Movement and I, by name, were held up as prototypes for “madness,” together with Holocaust deniers and anti-Darwinists, and were called “crackpots” along the way. The High Court ruled that these smears were acceptable! Niels Harrit

[yokel]

Likely the most incisive comment you have ever made.;)

The professor also calls you one.
Members of the 9/11 Truth Movement and I, by name, were held up as prototypes for “madness,” together with Holocaust deniers and anti-Darwinists, and were called “crackpots” along the way. The High Court ruled that these smears were acceptable! Niels Harrit

Do you really think all that shit you keep talking trumps the laws of physics??

You just keep going around in circles sound like...... well a crackpot.

[husaberg]

Do you really think all that shit you keep talking trumps the laws of physics??

You just keep going around in circles sound like...... well a crackpot.

Did you miss the bit at the trial when Niels Harrits called a eminent physicst (an actual professor unlike him)whose testimony was totally contrary to his own theories.
Why is it you think he could not find anyone that would go along with his theory, if it had any foundation at all?

Niels Harrit had called professor of theoretical physics Per Hedegård from the University of Copenhagen's Niels Bohr Institute as a witness on his own behalf.
Hedegård's testimony appeared not to support Niels Harrit's claim that WTC7 could not have been a free fall but a controlled explosion.

He even implied that the speed of the building's collapse could theoretically be above free fall due to the complex nature of the energy waves, undermining the clear-cut nature of Niels Harrit's argument. All in all, his testimony did not appear to support Niels Harrit http://universitypost.dk/article/courtroom-drama-911-crackpot-libel-case
Under Danish libel law, Villemoes (the reporter who called him a crackpot) had the burden of demonstrating a factual basis for his claim that Niels Harrit is a crackpot. He did

[yokel]

Did you miss the bit at the trial when Niels Harrits called a eminent physicst whose testimony was contrary to his own theories.

Under Danish libel law, Villemoes (the reporter who called him a crackpot) had the burden of demonstrating a factual basis for his claim that Niels Harrit is a crackpot. He did

That link goes nowhere you stupid cunt,

The laws of physics trumps any libel law.


Just for fun

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/zNdYtDWnuBk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

[husaberg]

That link goes nowhere you stupid cunt,

The laws of physics trumps any libel law.

></iframe>
Exactly what the court thought too that why they repeadily ruled against the crackpot
#note Niels Harrit is not a professor as is often claimed, he is an associate professor in chemistry.
Niels Harrit had called an actual professor of theoretical physics Per Hedegård from the University of Copenhagen's Niels Bohr Institute to act as a witness on his own behalf.
Hedegård's testimony did not support Niels Harrit's claim that WTC7 could not have been a free fall but a controlled explosion.
He even implied that the speed of the building's collapse could theoretically be above free fall due to the complex nature of the energy waves, undermining the clear-cut nature of Niels Harrit's argument.
All in all, his testimony did not appear to support Niels Harrit's assertions http://universitypost.dk/article/cou...pot-libel-case

http://universitypost.dk/article/courtroom-drama-911-crackpot-libel-case

[yokel]

Exactly what the court thought note Niels Harrit is not a professor as is often claimed he is an associate professor in chemistry
Niels Harrit had called professor of theoretical physics Per Hedegård from the University of Copenhagen's Niels Bohr Institute as a witness on his own behalf.
Hedegård's testimony appeared not to support Niels Harrit's claim that WTC7 could not have been a free fall but a controlled explosion.

He even implied that the speed of the building's collapse could theoretically be above free fall due to the complex nature of the energy waves, undermining the clear-cut nature of Niels Harrit's argument. All in all, his testimony did not appear to support Niels Harrit http://universitypost.dk/article/cou...pot-libel-case

http://universitypost.dk/article/courtroom-drama-911-crackpot-libel-case

Can't you fucking read? "All in all, his testimony did not appear to support Niels Harrit" hahaha yeah thats definitive, fuck you're muppet.

I like this reply to that article.
Of course it doesn't matter to you because you can't fucking comprehend shit.

" Dear Mike Young
Thanks for reporting on the case. This is a very important case in world history, and Dr. Harrit is a very courageous man. As a journalist you of course must be impartial, and you do not, as Mr. Willemoes, villify Dr. Harrit in your article.
Sadly however you misrepresent Dr. Harrit's entire arguement. You apparently do not understand the elementary concepts which are at issue.
You write
"....Niels Harrit's claim that WTC7 could not have been a free fall but a controlled explosion".
There are several things wrong with this wording.
1. You set up an dichotomy between a free fall or a controlled explosion. That misses the entire point.
2. Your wording "a free fall". Apparently you understand this to mean, a building on fire which falls down by itself. That is incorrect.
Free Fall Speed is the relevant term in this case. This is the speed at which an object falls when there is no resistance.
Dr. Harrits DOES say that the buildings fell, at free fall speed. The fact that they fell at free fall speed is exactly what implies that something has instantaneously removed all the support which held up the building.
3. "a controlled explosion". Although not incorrect, this term is not entirely what is at issue in the case.
Controlled Demolition is the relevant concept. With controlled demolition the building's support collumns are destroyed by strategically placed and strategically timed explosions.
Here's the argument. Very simple.
Only controlled demolition (controlled explosion) can bring down a building at free fall speed.
It is impossible for a building to collapse in that manner by simply burning."


More on the 6,000,000 lies.


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/w6Vb_kRDRM8?list=PLb2DIwBP5sxHtm7OTq5msPGCCHvX9xMr j" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

[husaberg]

Can't you fucking read? "All in all, his testimony did not appear to support Niels Harrit" hahaha yeah thats definitive, fuck you're muppet.

I like this reply to that article.
Of course it doesn't matter to you because you can't fucking comprehend shit.

>

That's epic................
His own expert witness (he called in a attempt to corroborate his testimony) does not support him and you can't even figure it out.
The Physics professor's testimony did not support Harrit's theories. (that's right his own witness did not support his theories)
As I have said the court ruling was definitive. the scientist he called was definitive.
http://universitypost.dk/article/courtroom-drama-911-crackpot-libel-case

He even implied that the speed of the building's collapse could theoretically be above free fall due to the complex nature of the energy waves, undermining the clear-cut nature of Niels Harrit's argument. All in all, his testimony did not appear to support Niels Harrit



Villemoes' lawyer asked Hedegaard if he could support statements he had made about Harrit quoted in an article used in City Court — statements substantiating that Dr. Harrit was a "crackpot". Hedegaard replied that he still agreed with his statements in the article, in which he had called Harrit's theories "nuts." That became the final answer from the last witness of the day.

ps keep adding the Nazi links it really demonstrates what a bunch of retarded idiots you 911 conspiracy theorists are........:done:

[Katman]

the scientist he called was definitive.


Are you suggesting that 'implying' something is 'theoretically' possible is being definitive?

[husaberg]

Are you suggesting that 'implying' something is 'theoretically' possible is being definitive?

It is definitive when the person he was asked to provide evidence for was adamant it was actually impossible.

Niels Harrit had called professor of theoretical physics Per Hedegård from the University of Copenhagen's Niels Bohr Institute as a witness on his own behalf.
Hedegård's testimony appeared not to support Niels Harrit's claim that WTC7 could not have been a free fall but a controlled explosion.

He even implied that the speed of the building's collapse could theoretically be above free fall due to the complex nature of the energy waves, undermining the clear-cut nature of Niels Harrit's argument. All in all, his testimony did not appear to support Niels Harrit http://universitypost.dk/article/cou...pot-libel-case

But as I have said Niels Harrit is not a professor of physics..........
Nor has anyone credible supported his assertions.........

[Katman]

It is definitive when the person he was asked to provide evidence for was adamant it was actually impossible.


Ok, so we'll go with the fact that you believe 'implying' something is 'theoretically' possible is being 'definitive'.

I'm glad we've gotten a step closer to establishing just how fucked in the head you are.

[husaberg]

Ok, so we'll go with the fact that you believe 'implying' something is 'theoretically' possible is being 'definitive'.

I'm glad we've gotten a step closer to establishing just how fucked in the head you are.

Yeah When someone calls someone much more qualified than himself as an expert witness (in a vain attempt to back up his own testimony) as being a totally impossible scenario, he would never look stupid in your world when his expert says no it is possible :killingme
That must be why the Court found your star conspiracy expert to be a crackpot.

Under Danish libel law, Villemoes (the reporter who called him a crackpot) had the burden of demonstrating a factual basis for his claim that Niels Harrit is a crackpot. He did

Then again you have previously offered up that paedophiles are actually people of good character.
Also that just because a person has a serious mental illness and has be convicted of fraud it doesn't mean that anyone should be suspicious of his latest invention that he is trying to raise money for

[Katman]

Yeah When someone calls someone much more qualified than himself as an expert witness (in a vain attempt to back up his own testimony) as being totally impossible scenario, he would never look stupid in your world when his expert says no it is possible :killingme
That must be why the Court found your star conspiracy expert to be a crackpot.

Under Danish libel law, Villemoes (the reporter who called him a crackpot) had the burden of demonstrating a factual basis for his claim that Niels Harrit is a crackpot. He did

Then again you have previously offered up that paedophiles are actually people of good character.
Also that just because a person has a serious mental illness and has be convicted of fraud it doesn't mean that anyone should be suspicious of his latest invention that he is trying to raise money for

Seriously man, you're taking this fixation on being repeatedly proven to be a total utter moron in public a little too far.

[husaberg]

Seriously man, you're taking this fixation of being repeatedly proven to be a total utter moron in public a little too far.

Nice attempt at narcissistic projection, but you are sadly mistaken if you believe anyone of average intellegence places any credence in any of your theories or observations.
As always the offer is always open to take a IQ test against me.

[Katman]

As always the offer is always open to take a IQ test against me.

I bet the IQ test would win.

[husaberg]

I bet the IQ test would win.

Might have been even funnier if you hadn't spelt cock wrong in your last rep comment to me :niceone:

[Akzle]

I'm glad we've gotten a step closer to establishing just how fucked in the head you are.

on a scale of one to ten.... He's 11.

One being "fuck that cunt's retarded" and ten being "his mum drank during pregnancy and he's had repeated head injuries since"

[Katman]

Might have been even funnier if you hadn't spelt cock wrong in your last rep comment to me :niceone:

No, I'm sure I spelt cock (http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/member.php/28036-husaberg) correctly.

[husaberg]

No, I'm sure I spelt cock (http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/member.php/28036-husaberg) correctly.


That's epic................
His own expert witness (he called in a attempt to corroborate his testimony) does not support him and you can't even figure it out.
The Physics professor's testimony did not support Harrit's theories. (that's right his own witness did not support his theories)
As I have said the court ruling was definitive. the scientist he called was definitive.
http://universitypost.dk/article/courtroom-drama-911-crackpot-libel-case

:


Are you suggesting that 'implying' something is 'theoretically' possible is being definitive?


Did you notice his use of the exclamation mark?

What do you think that signifies, shitforbrains?

Ok, so we'll go with the fact that you believe 'implying' something is 'theoretically' possible is being 'definitive'.

I'm glad we've gotten a step closer to establishing just how fucked in the head you are.
epic your experts star expert witness a real physic professor rather than a crackpot assistant chemistry professor what does he think of the person that asked him to give expert testimony....
He thinks and states that his theories are nuts:clap:

Villemoes' lawyer asked Hedegaard if he could support statements he had made about Harrit quoted in an article used in City Court — statements substantiating that Dr. Harrit was a "crackpot". Hedegaard replied that he still agreed with his statements in the article, in which he had called Harrit's theories "nuts." That became the final answer from the last witness of the day.
http://www.ae911truth.org/news/207-news-media-events-danish-high-court-harrit.html

[yokel]

epic your experts star expert witness a real physic professor rather than a crackpot assistant chemistry professor what does he think of the person that asked him to give expert testimony....
He thinks and states that his theories are nuts:clap:

http://www.ae911truth.org/news/207-news-media-events-danish-high-court-harrit.html

From your link.

"Dr. Harrit pointed out that between the lines in this footnote NIST was actually admitting that there is no public theory on how the North Tower and South Tower were destroyed, nor is there an explanation of the collapse sequence, as the report stops at the moment the towers were about to go down. Upon hearing this explanation, the accused Søren Villemoes raised his eyebrows in seeming surprise and leaned back in his chair."

And

"Finally, it was time for Dr. Harrit to present the first piece of new evidence. He projected a video of World Trade Center Building 7's collapse onto the wall of the High Court. As the video played the 6.5-second collapse of the 600-foot, 47-story building over and over, the professor described what was happening, and in so doing showed himself to be a logical scientist who naturally had questions about a phenomenon that was identical in appearance to a controlled demolition. From the expression on one judge's face — a look of disbelief that 9/11 skeptics know quite well — it was obvious he had never before seen the video. Whether the other two judges had watched the collapse of WTC 7 before is hard to say; their faces were inscrutable. Making the judges watch WTC 7 fall again and again was what Dr. Harrit later called his biggest achievement of the day."

[husaberg]

From your link.

"Dr. Harrit pointed out that between the lines in this footnote NIST was actually admitting that there is no public theory on how the North Tower and South Tower were destroyed, nor is there an explanation of the collapse sequence, as the report stops at the moment the towers were about to go down. Upon hearing this explanation, the accused Søren Villemoes raised his eyebrows in seeming surprise and leaned back in his chair."

And

"Finally, it was time for Dr. Harrit to present the first piece of new evidence. He projected a video of World Trade Center Building 7's collapse onto the wall of the High Court. As the video played the 6.5-second collapse of the 600-foot, 47-story building over and over, the professor described what was happening, and in so doing showed himself to be a logical scientist who naturally had questions about a phenomenon that was identical in appearance to a controlled demolition. From the expression on one judge's face — a look of disbelief that 9/11 skeptics know quite well — it was obvious he had never before seen the video. Whether the other two judges had watched the collapse of WTC 7 before is hard to say; their faces were inscrutable. Making the judges watch WTC 7 fall again and again was what Dr. Harrit later called his biggest achievement of the day."

Yet none of this relates to the fact the Harrit was proven in court to be a crack pot or that his theories were called nuts by the expert witness he called to act on his behalf.


Villemoes' lawyer asked Hedegaard if he could support statements he had made about Harrit quoted in an article used in City Court — statements substantiating that Dr. Harrit was a "crackpot". Hedegaard replied that he still agreed with his statements in the article, in which he had called Harrit's theories "nuts." That became the final answer from the last witness of the day.

I actually used that link as it was on a conspiracy site, for the simple reason that deluded types such as you and Katman would have to say it was obviously a pure unadulterated source of the total truth.:killingme
so thus will you now admit that the expert witness called by Harrit thinks that his theories are "NUTS" or are you still in denial...........:killingme

Ever wonder why you need to constantly change the subject... I will give you a hint you are losing...............