Log in

View Full Version : Paris policeman shot in head as he pleads for life



Pages : 1 [2]

Big Dog
14th January 2015, 10:57
Or the 200 Pakistani kids.


Stupid phone / Tapatalk, apologies in advance.

oldrider
14th January 2015, 11:19
Yep - White lives matter though mate.

I can't seem to recall world leaders all banding together for a walk of shame, I mean remembrance when the Israeli Navy deliberately targeted and killed a group kids playing soccer on the beach.

Well they did band together at the UN to prevent the Palestinians having their case heard over Israeli occupation - with USA supporting Israel as usual!
Link:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/30/un-palestinian-draft_n_6397766.html Which way did NZ vote again? :scratch:

Katman
16th January 2015, 17:28
I'm pleased to see Jim McLay exposing the ineffectual nature of the UN in his address to the Security Council.

Makes me wonder how long before we're treated to a 'terrorist attack' as punishment for not toeing the line.

oldrider
16th January 2015, 19:33
I'm pleased to see Jim McLay exposing the ineffectual nature of the UN in his address to the Security Council.

Makes me wonder how long before we're treated to a 'terrorist attack' as punishment for not toeing the line.

Read this link:http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2015/01/12/the-zionist-lobby-myth-reality-or-mythic-reality/ Sub heading: Across the ditch!

We have (in NZ) a mild equivalent of AIPAC a Jewish lobby group and always have had! - Fair enough but now we have a seat on the UN security council again!

What will this mean? - Will we see unbridled pressure lobbying on issues relating to Palestine and Israel so that our vote becomes automatically pro Israel?

New Zealanders should take care to ensure that our representatives on the council vote fairly and without prejudice from any single interest lobby group!

So far so good but keep a very close eye on proceedings and outcomes created by our representatives performance on this council.

yokel
17th January 2015, 07:37
I always thought the smoke coming off the pavement looked kind odd? could this be why?

http://youtu.be/KkWz7Inn-4A

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/6hnz68pxD50" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

scumdog
17th January 2015, 19:27
I always thought the smoke coming off the pavement looked kind odd? could this be why?



What the fuck is THAT? - a hooded monk playing with two carrots??:shit:

Laava
17th January 2015, 19:36
What the fuck is THAT? - a hooded monk playing with two carrots??:shit:

FFS man! Have you not seen irrefutable proof before!

Ocean1
17th January 2015, 19:41
FFS man! Have you not seen irrefutable proof before!

I think that proof's been futed a few times too many, it looks like shit.

Woodman
17th January 2015, 20:29
What the fuck is THAT? - a hooded monk playing with two carrots??:shit:

Close. Anti gravity carrots.

oldrider
17th January 2015, 22:16
Does all this world unrest have a direction? - Hindsight is always a powerful influence as a deciding influence!

David Icke made some interesting claims early in 2014 (it's what he does after all) about the development of ISIS - the middle East - Russia and Iran! (France? etc etc)

Now with hindsight have another listen to what he said would transpire: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HK5ZAapfylQ

Are there any bad guys out there trying to spoil our day? - Interesting to say the least! :shifty:

jonbuoy
17th January 2015, 22:20
Does all this world unrest have a direction? - Hindsight is always a powerful influence as a deciding influence!

David Icke made some interesting claims early in 2014 (it's what he does after all) about the development of ISIS - the middle East - Russia and Iran! (France? etc etc)

Now with hindsight have another listen to what he said would transpire: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HK5ZAapfylQ

Are there any bad guys out there trying to spoil our day? - Interesting to say the least! :shifty:

He also believes Reptilian Aliens are amongst us. He lost the plot years ago- should have stuck to sports reporting.

oldrider
17th January 2015, 23:55
He also believes Reptilian Aliens are amongst us. He lost the plot years ago- should have stuck to sports reporting.

Fair enough but

I wasn't interested in his reptilian stuff so much, haven't even read or heard it - am interested in hindsight accuracy of his (and anyone else's) political comments!

We have the benefit of living through a lot of military/political activity and forecasting etc - how much of it gets played out as was predicted?

Suggesting or requesting a bit of follow up really.

Whether they are nutters conspiracy theorists or patriots isn't so important - what would be interesting to know is - did it actually happen? :yes: or :no:.

unstuck
18th January 2015, 06:22
He also believes Reptilian Aliens are amongst us.

Boy, are you in for a shock.:shifty:

yokel
18th January 2015, 06:44
You sheepeople are fucking hilarious, like a retard using a potato peeler for a comb, wil yous ever figure it out? ha

it wont be long before anything they don't like will look like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAk5G9x9Jdw

looks like the brother of this cop wants to see some evidence of his bro dying/being killed http://youtu.be/_8DQHdnA51M guess what, I bet he wont get to see any.

the sheepeople police, of the sheepeople for the sheepeople.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/qSX7xcCwCk4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

TheDemonLord
18th January 2015, 08:29
You sheepeople are fucking hilarious, like a retard using a potato peeler for a comb, wil yous ever figure it out? ha

it wont be long before anything they don't like will look like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAk5G9x9Jdw

looks like the brother of this cop wants to see some evidence of his bro dying/being killed http://youtu.be/_8DQHdnA51M guess what, I bet he wont get to see any.

the sheepeople police, of the sheepeople for the sheepeople.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/qSX7xcCwCk4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

If by Sheepeople (I thought it was spelt sheeple) you mean "people who demand a little bit more than the flimsy and loosely circumstantial evidence before making a definitive claim' then fair enough - but I would rather be a 'Sheepeople' than some gullible prat who believes the first thing that the conspiracy theorist websites tell you.

In fact - you are just as bad as the people you claim to be Sheepeople - the only difference is the source from which you consume your BS - one from mainstream news, the other from conspiracy theorist news.

Laava
18th January 2015, 08:50
If by Sheepeople (I thought it was spelt sheeple) you mean "people who demand a little bit more than the flimsy and loosely circumstantial evidence before making a definitive claim' then fair enough - but I would rather be a 'Sheepeople' than some gullible prat who believes the first thing that the conspiracy theorist websites tell you.

In fact - you are just as bad as the people you claim to be Sheepeople - the only difference is the source from which you consume your BS - one from mainstream news, the other from conspiracy theorist news.

Stop feeding cassinayokel

Woodman
18th January 2015, 09:09
If by Sheepeople (I thought it was spelt sheeple) you mean "people who demand a little bit more than the flimsy and loosely circumstantial evidence before making a definitive claim' then fair enough - but I would rather be a 'Sheepeople' than some gullible prat who believes the first thing that the conspiracy theorist websites tell you.

In fact - you are just as bad as the people you claim to be Sheepeople - the only difference is the source from which you consume your BS - one from mainstream news, the other from conspiracy theorist news.

He won't understand.


Stop feeding cassinayokel

No keep feeding him, Yokel is comedy gold.

yokel
18th January 2015, 09:22
If by Sheepeople (I thought it was spelt sheeple) you mean "people who demand a little bit more than the flimsy and loosely circumstantial evidence before making a definitive claim' then fair enough - but I would rather be a 'Sheepeople' than some gullible prat who believes the first thing that the conspiracy theorist websites tell you.

In fact - you are just as bad as the people you claim to be Sheepeople - the only difference is the source from which you consume your BS - one from mainstream news, the other from conspiracy theorist news.

what do you think is going to happen once the governments and the mainstream media has control over the internet? this is a BIG deal.

you are the gullible prat not I

TheDemonLord
18th January 2015, 15:39
what do you think is going to happen once the governments and the mainstream media has control over the internet? this is a BIG deal.

you are the gullible prat not I

Is this about Internet censorship?

I don't think it is.

And in that discussion, I will be most vocal (I work in IT so am privy to a little bit more about how the internet works)

as for what this is about - its about making massive conclusions from tiny bits of flimsy evidence.

Which is just what the mainstream media and the so-called 'Sheeple' do - and to that end, you are no better.

yokel
18th January 2015, 18:32
Is this about Internet censorship?

I don't think it is.

And in that discussion, I will be most vocal (I work in IT so am privy to a little bit more about how the internet works)

as for what this is about - its about making massive conclusions from tiny bits of flimsy evidence.

Which is just what the mainstream media and the so-called 'Sheeple' do - and to that end, you are no better.

the fact that these so called gunmen said they were from Al Qaeda says a fucking lot, you dont really need any more evidence that this event is not what the bank controlled media is saying that it is. (does this make any sense? I'm hungry and been drinking beer)

how about this retarded shit in Hamilton? cops with body armer,face shields and Roman type battle shielded WTF!? almost like watching the Paris shooting unfolding in Hams haha

http://www.3news.co.nz/nznews/hamilton-police-break-up-out-of-control-parties-2015011816#axzz3P9Osu02r

as for me being no better?? I dont think so Tim

TheDemonLord
18th January 2015, 21:22
the fact that these so called gunmen said they were from Al Qaeda says a fucking lot, you dont really need any more evidence that this event is not what the bank controlled media is saying that it is. (does this make any sense? I'm hungry and been drinking beer)

how about this retarded shit in Hamilton? cops with body armer,face shields and Roman type battle shielded WTF!? almost like watching the Paris shooting unfolding in Hams haha

http://www.3news.co.nz/nznews/hamilton-police-break-up-out-of-control-parties-2015011816#axzz3P9Osu02r

as for me being no better?? I dont think so Tim

Actually, I require a lot more evidence - you see the thing with extraordinary claims, is that they require extraordinary proof, a Gunmen said they were from a specific organization is not extraordinary proof - sure it Could be an indicator that it isn't what it first seems but likewise it could also not have any bearing at all. The difference is that I am saying without substantial proof, I must default to the position of what is more likely:

- Some disenfranchised people following the preachings of a middle ages deranged pedophile decide to try and win themselves poontang eternal with their 77 virgins OR
- It is some massive cover operation which only you - the Great Yokel has the wit and insight to decipher the small clues to uncover the sinister plot by the evil corporations

I mean really - how egotistical do you have to be to believe that you and you alone have unearthed some great conspiracy?

As for my name congratulations on doing a 5 minute Google search (probably either my BattleLog page or my CyberGamer page)

Pat yourself on the back

Top detective work

10/10

Mr Sherlock Holmes prostrates himself before your superior detective work.....

Big Dog
18th January 2015, 22:51
As for my name congratulations on doing a 5 minute Google search (probably either my BattleLog page or my CyberGamer page)

Pat yourself on the back

Top detective work

10/10

Mr Sherlock Holmes prostrates himself before your superior detective work.....
Or he just quoted a TV show from the 90's and you just outed yourself.



Stupid phone / Tapatalk, apologies in advance.

oldrider
19th January 2015, 14:08
Found this accidentally on internet and thought "interesting" if nothing else!:http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2015/01/18/what-the-charlie-hebdo-execution-video-really-shows.html

Also thought "yokel" - obviously he is not alone! :oi-grr:

SPman
19th January 2015, 15:04
In fact - you are just as bad as the people you claim to be Sheepeople - the only difference is the source from which you consume your BS - one from mainstream news, the other from conspiracy theorist news.

From the well known conspiracy theorist, Paul Craig Roberts....


Additionally, although false flag attacks are commonplace and have been used throughout history to advance undeclared agendas, the public has been brainwashed to regard them as “conspiracy theories.” Thus, anyone who raises questions is dismissed as a “conspiracy theorist.”
Many Americans do not understand that the official story of 9/11, for example, is a conspiracy theory. So is the official explanation of the Boston Marathon Bombing and the Charlie Hebdo attack. What it boils down to is that official conspiracy theories are accepted as true, but everyone who questions them is a “conspiracy theorist.”

TheDemonLord
19th January 2015, 16:00
From the well known conspiracy theorist, Paul Craig Roberts....

There is a difference between questioning the claimed version of events and demanding evidence (skepticism) and extrapolating an entire theory based on misinterpreted or flimsy bits of evidence (conspiracy theorism)

yokel
19th January 2015, 18:53
There is a difference between questioning the claimed version of events and demanding evidence (skepticism) and extrapolating an entire theory based on misinterpreted or flimsy bits of evidence (conspiracy theorism)

yes there is a difference, the latter occurs due to based, misinterpreted or flimsy bits of evidence that accompany the claimed version of events, eg where is some CCTV footage (or any footage for that matter) of the shooters that ID's them?? all i've seen is two people with masks that could be anyone.

most of the conspiracies are at best half true or totally incorrect, just like what is reported in the mainstream media.

any event that leads to expansion of government and their ever increasing powers need to be questioned, how much danger are we really in from these terrorists? fuck all! there is a clear pattern emerging.

Bill burr knows whats up http://youtu.be/lnelM6klBBY

yokel
27th January 2015, 16:05
looks like the suicidal cop may have uncovered something that needed to remain covered?

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/_NGOMzmGwS0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>