View Full Version : a little worksafe Porn...
Marmoot
5th October 2005, 17:41
Oh baby..... :love:
nudemetalz
5th October 2005, 17:44
13 years old now and still very sexy !!!!
(hmm,..that didn't sound right...)
inlinefour
5th October 2005, 17:54
Total rice rocket! :niceone:
Marmoot
5th October 2005, 17:56
Yess!!! Yess!!!!.. :devil2:
slob
5th October 2005, 18:09
NR500 I presume? Where are the pics from? Funny how so many styling cues that are supposedly 'modern' appear on it! Looks like a Ducati kind of.
bugjuice
5th October 2005, 18:21
now that's pron... I saw a cut away drawing on a poster at one of the bike shops I was at, and thought 'man, that's a sexy bike..'. Screams 80s style, but still sexy..
mstriumph
5th October 2005, 18:26
mmmmmm sooooooo red ................ :dodge:
bugjuice
5th October 2005, 18:44
yeah, cos the colour is the focus here..
nudemetalz
5th October 2005, 19:33
NR500 I presume? Where are the pics from? Funny how so many styling cues that are supposedly 'modern' appear on it! Looks like a Ducati kind of.
Nah this is the NR750, 32 valves, 2 conrods per piston, 15,000rpm redline, and blimmin heavy !!!
But oooooohhhhhhh sooooo sexy !!!!
Ducati "borrowed" the styling cues..(undertail exhaust and single-sided swingarm)
(ducks and awaits for the fight to begin)
Marmoot
5th October 2005, 20:06
Nah this is the NR750, 32 valves, 2 conrods per piston, 15,000rpm redline, and blimmin heavy !!!
2 conrods per piston, and 2 plugs per cylinder.
Try 22,500 for the redline....it's more accurate :love:
Have never heard of the sound, but people said it "sound like a dream"...
The main drawback was that it cost too much to make the piston rings as it was very hard to make the flat side (it's oval, you see....)
For cutaway picture, try this :whistle:
ducatilover
5th October 2005, 20:33
13 years old now and still very sexy !!!!
(hmm,..that didn't sound right...)
lol, bit past its prime for you? :bleh:
ducatilover
5th October 2005, 20:37
are these for real? where do i get one? or two? mmmmmmm v4 and seing as its red ir must be fast.... :headbang:
thehollowmen
5th October 2005, 21:30
The main drawback was that it cost too much to make the piston rings as it was very hard to make the flat side (it's oval, you see....)
Oh
My
God
I remember seeing that bike on beyond 2000
scumdog
5th October 2005, 21:32
Hmmm, could do with a few tassles but.....
nudemetalz
5th October 2005, 21:32
2 conrods per piston, and 2 plugs per cylinder.
Try 22,500 for the redline....it's more accurate :love:
Have never heard of the sound, but people said it "sound like a dream"...
The main drawback was that it cost too much to make the piston rings as it was very hard to make the flat side (it's oval, you see....)
For cutaway picture, try this :whistle:
Great pic,..but
The NR500 racer redlined at 22,500rpm (that was it's downfall, too peaky), but the roadbike 750 redlined at 15,000.
Yes the roadbike had 2 plugs per cylinder (for want of a better word)
SuperDave
5th October 2005, 21:50
When I saw the very first picture I thought it was one of those minibikes!
But that bike looks awesome, when did they stop making them?
gav
5th October 2005, 22:31
1992 the NR came out, typical Honda, released it as the ultimate sports tourer ie it was overweight and underpowered. Shame, should have been the ultimate sports bike, with 150hp at the rear wheel. Instead it had around 125hp (claimed) and weighed about 225kg (dry).
I was working in a Honda shop at the time and remember seeing the brochure, was like a full on glossy magazine and no the rep wasnt giving any away either. Had one enquiry from a guy claiming to have won lotto and wanted one, think the price was around $100,000NZD!!! Told him we'd need 25% deposit to order it, but sadly never heard from him again, don't know if he was full of shit or not? :whistle:
nudemetalz
5th October 2005, 22:44
It also had a trick screen with a blue hue through it that also reflected the digital speedo like a HUD didn't it ?
dangerous
6th October 2005, 05:42
think the price was around $100,000NZD!!!
Try $200,000............ there is a couple for sale in Europe, heres some info and 2 pics that SuzyQ & 30UTD took last month while on holliday.
The last pic is the GP bike the NR500, which was built with ovel pistons 8v per cyl etc as it was the closest thing to a V8..... restrictions ment 4cyl max :headbang:
Marmoot
6th October 2005, 12:43
The last pic is the GP bike the NR500, which was built with ovel pistons 8v per cyl etc as it was the closest thing to a V8..... restrictions ment 4cyl max :headbang:
Same concept that they put onto NR750. Oval pistons were basically 2 small cylinders joined together (that's why they were oval).
I remembered now, yes the redline was put down from 22,500 planned to 15,000 production. That's why the power was down and they reckon it was a disapointment thus it was not put to race (and thus it was only produced at one go, and nothing more....hence became a collectible item).
Same story as with Jaguar XJ220, which were supposed to be made using V12 but came out with a V8 instead. Still the fastest production car ever, though....
But who cares about the power! that thing is sexy! with an all aluminium frame, monocoque carbon-fibre tank+body (which cost almost US$10,000 to make), specially coated windscreen, and rarity that could literally send someone to kill for.
It still retails at (at least) around US$55,000 if you happen to see one for sale.
TonyB
6th October 2005, 13:07
As the bike mags said at the time- yeh its cool, but why not just buy a cheaper, lighter, better handling,more powerful and FASTER GSXR/FZR/ZXR 750? Those things must have cost Honda millions in un-recouped development costs...
WRT
6th October 2005, 14:27
And its even got a fuel gauge . . .
Marmoot
6th October 2005, 14:34
As the bike mags said at the time- yeh its cool, but why not just buy a cheaper, lighter, better handling,more powerful and FASTER GSXR/FZR/ZXR 750? Those things must have cost Honda millions in un-recouped development costs...
Seriously?? With a bike that looks like it can give you orgasm just by sitting on it? :mellow:
if you have the money and can buy a Ferrarri.....why not?
besides, if I DO have the money, I would most certainly have enough to buy a second bike, which would be a FireBlade :devil2:
nudemetalz
6th October 2005, 14:36
Same concept that they put onto NR750. Oval pistons were basically 2 small cylinders joined together (that's why they were oval).
I remembered now, yes the redline was put down from 22,500 planned to 15,000 production. That's why the power was down and they reckon it was a disapointment thus it was not put to race (and thus it was only produced at one go, and nothing more....hence became a collectible item).
Same story as with Jaguar XJ220, which were supposed to be made using V12 but came out with a V8 instead. Still the fastest production car ever, though....
But who cares about the power! that thing is sexy! with an all aluminium frame, monocoque carbon-fibre tank+body (which cost almost US$10,000 to make), specially coated windscreen, and rarity that could literally send someone to kill for.
It still retails at (at least) around US$55,000 if you happen to see one for sale.
Sorry to pick points, but are you sure that the NR750 roadbike was going to redline at 22,500rpm??
I have always read that it was only ever to redline at 15K, apart from the specially lightened one.
from: http://www.v-four.freeserve.co.uk/nr750.htm
"Since it couldn't be homologated for World Championship racing Honda decided the NR750 could be used to attempt some records. A lightened, tuned NR, making 150bhp @ 15,500rpm and weighinhg just 180kg was produced (compared to the standard bikes' 222kg). Diminutive GP rider Loris Capirossi set new flying mile, flying kilometre and standing start mile & 10km records, assuring its place in the record books."
oh, and the XJ220 was a V6....
Okay, I'll shut up now !!
Marmoot
6th October 2005, 14:41
oh, and the XJ220 was a V6....
yeh.....picky.....OK, it's a V6. But I was right that it was conceptualized (and marketed) as a V12 before it came out :whistle:
The funny thing about XJ220 was that when it came out, like a year overdue from what was promised, the pricetag has gone up quite a bit since the first offering, and Jaguar actually encouraged signed buyers to withdraw from the deal so it could re-sell the cars for the new pricetag.
Anyway, back to the bike, the paint looks beautifully freshly liquid....I wonder how much it would cost
onearmedbandit
6th October 2005, 14:44
Yep, the XJ220 was only a V6. There is still a few sitting in England unsold because of this little slight. Put down you deposit on one vehicle, only to be told you'll be getting another... Fastest production car ever?? I'm thinking Mclaren F1 for one, along with some others.
There is a Honda dealer in Japan who has an NR750, albeit a streetfighter version!!
Marmoot
6th October 2005, 14:47
Fastest production car ever?? I'm thinking Mclaren F1 for one, along with some others.
that'll be the fastest 0-100kph. Which is broken by Koenigsegg.......or Koenigsegg broke XJ220 record? Not sure....not really a car expert in that field.
But my dream gargre (garge? grage?) is XJ220, NR750 and a Fireblade.
bugjuice
6th October 2005, 14:48
the original prototype XJ220 shown to the world in the early 90s had semi-gullwing doors, 4x4 and a V12. The production car (of which was a mighty flop, and still have 10s of cars left to be sold long after production ceased) came out with regular doors, V6 turbo and RWD. Also featured an appaling array of parts from UK/European Ford cards, which you could pick up from most wreckers around the country. The car in iteslf was fairly reliable (especially compared to the electrical-bug-ridden McLaren F1, which is still the fastest mass production car), but over priced, had the phsyical dimensions of a 7 1/2 tonne box truck, and the brakes and turning circle to match too.
Either way, I still love the car, and I'd buy one if I had the money..
WRT
6th October 2005, 14:54
. . . long after production seized . . .
Yet more proof that there is always time for lube . . . maybe they should have ceased production before it seized?
nudemetalz
6th October 2005, 14:58
I remember Jeremy Clarkson testing the XJ220.
There was a camera inside and he said "watch this.."
He floored it and the glovebox lid came flying open……oops, still a hint of BMC in there…
and sorry for being picky, Marmoot
bugjuice
6th October 2005, 14:59
Yet more proof that there is always time for lube . . . maybe they should have ceased production before it seized?
woteva.. i've not had nearly enough coffee today
nudemetalz
6th October 2005, 15:26
NR750 Streetfighter...hmmm,...no thanks, I'll have the original.
WRT
6th October 2005, 15:45
NR750 Streetfighter...hmmm,...no thanks, I'll have the original.
Yup, I second that ;)
The Stranger
6th October 2005, 15:50
2 conrods per piston
Aye?
Surely you jest?
WRT
6th October 2005, 15:53
Aye?
Surely you jest?
Would assume they are side by side, cause of the oval pistons . . .
nudemetalz
6th October 2005, 15:58
Maybe this explains it a little better.
Awesome piece of engineering
zadok
6th October 2005, 16:41
Here's mine from my collection.
nudemetalz
6th October 2005, 17:05
I have one of those too. Pity the front suspension doesn't.
Quite well detailed.
Marmoot
6th October 2005, 17:51
Would assume they are side by side, cause of the oval pistons . . .
hA Ha hA.....very funny. You wouldn't imagine them being end-to-end, would you? :mellow:
And, Nudemetalz, you sir are the pickiest bunch of them all :niceone:
Thank's for sorting out the fact of this beautifully crafted masterpiece called NR750 :love:
A real sex on 2 wheels
dangerous
6th October 2005, 17:56
Here's mine from my collection.
Hey, same here :apumpin:
nudemetalz
6th October 2005, 18:24
nah worries,
just that I have been a long devoted fan of the NR-750 and read up on pretty much everything on it.
zadok
6th October 2005, 19:52
Hey, same here :apumpin:
Veeeerrryy nice. :niceone:
gav
6th October 2005, 20:19
Weeellllll, if youre going to be picky, the actual bike was called an "NR" no mention of 750 :whistle:
Oh, and heres mine parked between the Guzzi and the Bimota :niceone:
Brian d marge
7th October 2005, 02:37
Maybe this explains it a little better.
Awesome piece of engineering
Been inside one of those ...and strangely enough ..at motegi they had one of the Engineers giving a lecture about it ...
Nice but ........The round ones are just as good
Stephen
ducatilover
9th October 2005, 20:31
Same story as with Jaguar XJ220, which were supposed to be made using V12 but came out with a V8 instead. Still the fastest production car ever, though.... wellllllll.....as many people have already pointed out the xj220 was supposed to be a v12 but ended up as a v6. it just so happens that the v6 was based on the MG metro 6R4 rally car engine but off course used twin turbo as a way of getting more power, as for fastest production car.....that was untill the mclaren f1 was released in 1994, the mf1 weighed less and also had more power and a 6 speed gear box, where the xj220 had a top speed of 220mp/h claimed [hence the name, just like alot of other jag cars, eg, xk120,xk140 etc] the mf1 had a factory claimed top speed of 231mp/h but the mf1 le-mans or gtr version has seen 241 unnoficialy. all out the mf1 was and still is one of the greatest cars of that genre, inc ferrari enzo, porsche carrera gt, and of course the pagani zonda c12S and soon to be bugatti veyron. not to mention the konessig and the EB Edonis.........mmmmmm tooooo much car books/ time :headbang:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.