PDA

View Full Version : Supra vs ZX10 vs 636 - interesting



Brett
28th June 2006, 22:11
Pointless yet still interesting. That supra must have some serious balls, it nails the 636 but the zx10r leaves it sitting...still damn fast for a cage, must be at least 600-700 hp.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85Uhxp32TZs&search=zx6r

gamgee
28th June 2006, 22:38
sorry, it's a kb tradition, gotta love the safety gear, doing a 200kph+ run in jeans and shoes :nono:

Brett
28th June 2006, 22:39
:zzzz:
sorry, it's a kb tradition, gotta love the safety gear, doing a 200kph+ run in jeans and shoes :nono:
LOL someone had to say it though!

imdying
28th June 2006, 22:40
What's with the ghey roll ons?

Cookie
28th June 2006, 22:46
Enjoyed the clip Brett.

I had a MkIII Supra once and loved it. Obviously I have made the right decision transfering my passion to bikes though!

gamgee
28th June 2006, 22:57
What's with the ghey roll ons?
obviously the car didn't have a shit show from a standing start, so to give it a chance a rolling start :scooter:

N4CR
28th June 2006, 23:26
And the funniest thing when I see those vids. Bikes are usually bone stock bar a can... :lol:

Seen a turbo busa go against a nos 800+hp viper too.. the turb'd bus got it. Another time a stock busa took off big time and then the viper went past with like 30k difference further up. Was impressive to see this car belting past a bus in full sing.
Same thing again with a 600awhp evo8.. a NO2'd R1 dicked it. The only thing to win out of all the vehicles it raced.. a nos r1. And there were some serious friggen cars up against it too. I think it's on streetfire or youtube.

Another time a 9.4sec drag supra against a turbo busa from 60mph. Supra spun it's wheels alittle bit was impressive.. bus anihillated it though. Later on in the vid the said supra (I think) blew up after racing a turbo bus again, Which was sad to see.

There is always something faster out there though...

I have aspirations to break the NZ land speed record some day... custom fairings like a cocoon and something big nasty and turbo'd. And a fuckload of room. Hehehehe... I think it is 342kmh from memory by some lemans Porsche?. A fully custom cocoon faired hypersports not disimilar to burt munroes speed demon (eg same coeficient of drag as a car) with a turbo and some once off boost levels should break that with ease. He got around 300kmh with 72Hp. A low coeficient of drag is all it takes.... and bikes suck at drag. shit that was a bad pun

Edbear
29th June 2006, 07:42
.... and bikes suck at drag.





LOL!!!!!!!!! Bet you didn't realise 'til you read it! Brilliant!:first:

Fishy
29th June 2006, 08:08
Seen a turbo busa go against a nos 800+hp viper too.. the turb'd bus got it. Another time a stock busa took off big time and then the viper went past with like 30k difference further up. Was impressive to see this car belting past a bus in full sing.
Same thing again with a 600awhp evo8.. a NO2'd R1 dicked it. The only thing to win out of all the vehicles it raced.. a nos r1. And there were some serious friggen cars up against it too. I think it's on streetfire or youtube.
[/size]

I've got these vid clips at home on my pc, I tried uploading them one day but it didn't work. Can't remember why, either file type or file too large.
I've got quite a few others like this too.

marty
29th June 2006, 09:37
speaking of jeans and sneakers, is it the latest kiwirider mag that has the bike test rider in said jeans and sneakers? a bit amateur isn't it?

Mr. Peanut
29th June 2006, 18:09
I think they got pulled up for that before, its kevlar stuff now methinks. :rockon:

MidnightMike
29th June 2006, 18:17
I think it is 342kmh from memory by some lemans Porsche?[/size]

Nah mate, its now 367kmh, i took my volty for a spin before to see what it could do :eek:

jimbo600
29th June 2006, 18:51
That guy on the 636 must be a pussy. Theres no way a zx10 is that much faster on acceleration than a Zx636. The 636 should have toasted the supra 700hp or not. Theres only about 1sec difference between a ZX10 and a ZX636 over a standing 1/4.

N4CR
29th June 2006, 19:48
That guy on the 636 must be a pussy. Theres no way a zx10 is that much faster on acceleration than a Zx636. The 636 should have toasted the supra 700hp or not. Theres only about 1sec difference between a ZX10 and a ZX636 over a standing 1/4.

Top end wise 40-50k REAL SPEED matters in those situations. Yes I have seen 636s indicate 282 or so kmh... and myself after being clocked at over 200 by a few big bikes on my 250cc... I doubt the accuracy of these speedos quite alot.
50k difference... means one bike stops pulling quite quickly. Down the quater they will get the same 10sec time with a perfect run. Do some mods and the thou will get into 9's easy, same with 600 with a very good run.. make it an 600-800m run and the results will be much different.
Best I have seen from a strapped 636 was 9.54? or something rediculous like that, I really don't think it was stock at all though.

In saying that.. these are roll-ons and as I said top end makes a big difference. That supra should have caught the zx10r later going past around ~320kmh if it was so quick... but it didn't. Weird.

justsomeguy
29th June 2006, 19:51
That guy on the 636 must be a pussy. Theres no way a zx10 is that much faster on acceleration than a Zx636. The 636 should have toasted the supra 700hp or not. Theres only about 1sec difference between a ZX10 and a ZX636 over a standing 1/4.

I agree - on a ride I saw Buggy completely smash a near new M3 who really wanted to be king of the road:wait: This was on a straight bit of motorway too so there was no slowing down for corners involved.

mynameis
29th June 2006, 20:12
Haha you're dead f**ken right, that's what I was gona say a 636 will pace the 1000 anyday with a good rider. Plus Supra was lucky it was just straight drags otherwise the bikes would have pissed all over the cage mate !


That guy on the 636 must be a pussy. Theres no way a zx10 is that much faster on acceleration than a Zx636. The 636 should have toasted the supra 700hp or not. Theres only about 1sec difference between a ZX10 and a ZX636 over a standing 1/4.

N4CR
29th June 2006, 20:16
I agree - on a ride I saw Buggy completely smash a near new M3 who really wanted to be king of the road:wait: This was on a straight bit of motorway too so there was no slowing down for corners involved.

With a 0-100 time of 5.2 secs a 250 could beat one off the lights... they are limited to 155mph anyway, buggy won't get there but close enough.



The third-generation M3 provides still further proof of BMW M 's technological expertise. The newly developed 3.2-litre engine delivers:

* 343 bhp at 7,900 rpm - a specific output of 105 bhp per litre
* 365Nm of torque at 4,900 rpm
* 0-62 sprint in just 5.2 seconds

and
Top speed: 155Mph (Electronically limited)



Not really a fast car at all compared to your pretty rare non-ricing supras with 10 gazillion HP. Still I'd like to see dyno sheets for all the '800hp supras' out there. Apparently everyones cousins vetinarians brother in laws butcher knows someone with a '500hp rotang' or a holden or general rice that could kick 'insert name here's' ass.

Not suprising that a 600 dicked it at all with figures like that.

justsomeguy
29th June 2006, 20:28
With a 0-100 time of 5.2 secs a 250 could beat one off the lights... they are limited to 155mph anyway, buggy won't get there but close enough.

Hmm, dunno bout that......

A 250 (the one's we ride) is a 14 sec bike, a M3 is a 13 sec car.

N4CR
29th June 2006, 20:48
Hmm, dunno bout that......

A 250 (the one's we ride) is a 14 sec bike, a M3 is a 13 sec car.

Keyword off the lights just the usual 0-speedlimit crap you do on a 250. I don't drag cars to 150+kmh over 400m. Slightly silly in most situations.
RS250's get 12.2-12.6 depending on the rider :lol: but that's cheating ;)

Brett
29th June 2006, 21:01
Agreed, quarter mile times the 636 and the thou would be pretty comparable, but when rolling on form a decent speed, the extra power makes the difference. It is that little bit of extra torque which manages to propel it past the 636...same principle why a car pullin an 11 sec quarter requires so much more HP to pull a 10 sec flat.

number33
30th June 2006, 20:57
Sitting on the grass bank under a pine tree at the Wanganui cemetry circuit watching the difference accelerate between 600 and 1000cc there's SFA difference. Ya can't even tell which is which.

MD
30th June 2006, 22:08
The 636 owners assn has issued a recall on that poofta's bike since he obviously isn't deserving enough and capable enough to own one.
I've come out of a bend many a time behind a 1000 when we're all riding full on and the 6 can stay pretty close on their tail until about 240+. Even after that it's not a big gap like that twat in the vid.
And he is an idiot drag racing at night in jeans and sneakers. His beach wear must have been in the wash.