Circumcision 'cuts' HIV infection [Archive]

ManDownUnder

14th December 2006, 08:30

It was the done thing when I was bron, and I personally see it as pointless unless a medical condition means it's needed.

Getting it done as a means of reducing the chances of getting HIV it stupid. You either take a risk or you don't. I'd suggest abstenance (or forming a very loving relationship with your right hand) before getting circumcised

Crasherfromwayback

14th December 2006, 08:39

Should be done.....we all know wearing a helmet can reduce the chance of injury.

Hitcher

14th December 2006, 08:42

Like the banning of Bullrush, this is the sort of thing that happens when women are allowed to have a say on things that affect men's llives.

Lias

14th December 2006, 08:44

I'm still a whole man, thank christ my mums not a yid or a yank.

ManDownUnder

14th December 2006, 08:47

Like the banning of Bullrush, this is the sort of thing that happens when women are allowed to have a say on things that affect men's llives.

That is soooo true - on so many levels.

WRT

14th December 2006, 08:54

Are you sure this is for real and not some piss take? The guy involved in a survey of circumcision is called Dr de Cock?

dawnrazor

14th December 2006, 09:05

I'm still a whole man, thank christ my mums not a yid or a yank.

"the snip" is not solely a jewish or an american thing, most english blokes have up until recently had the chop, 'cus it was free on the NHS, now you have to pay for them...and the number of people that go for it has dropped surprise surprise...it was found that one of the reasons women wanted babies chopped was 'cus it made washing babies dicks easier....nice one mum...and they say female circumcision is barbaric....not alot in it, both are well wrong

there is no reason for it in this day and age - funny aside, I visited the jewish museum in new york once, was okay some nice chigals. I had a moment of high delight when I realised that I was probably the only man in the building with his hat on, so to speak, nearly shouted it out, but thought I'd be asked to leave through the gentiles exit LOL

Anyways if you didn't have a foreskin where are you expected to keep your knob cheese....I've gone to far haven't I...smeg...ooops

terbang

14th December 2006, 09:07

Police helmet or grease gun..?

jrandom

14th December 2006, 09:09

I also thought that 'Dr De Cock' had to be a rort, but he looks legit (http://www.who.int/hiv/mediacentre/news59/en/index.html).

I think I was the last of the cut generation. Doesn't help having a Yiddish heritage, I suppose.

Naturally, my son's equipment has remained safely unmangled. His grandmother disagreed. Apparently, there's only one or two doctors in Auckland who will perform the procedure these days. I rather enjoyed telling my dear mother to get fucked on that particular issue.

Amazing how barbaric practices can manage to hang on through sheer inertia.

Flyingpony

14th December 2006, 09:12

Intact, not even considering to take the hat off.

Blairos

14th December 2006, 09:14

Police helmet or grease gun..?

Grease Gun :beer:

crashe

14th December 2006, 09:18

This article has been around for a little while.

Whether you have been circumsized or not........ USE CONDOMS.

If in doubt re this story, contact the NZAF and ask them.

But it highly recommened that every male use a CONDOM.

You never know what your partner is up to... as you are not with them 24/7.
They also dont know, what you are up to 24/7 either.

There are many men who are married/partner, will frequent the cruise places to have it off with other men (BJ, wank or anal)

So please ALL BE SAFE and USE CONDOMS.:yes:

jrandom

14th December 2006, 09:22

many men who are married/partner, will frequent the cruise places to have it off with other men (BJ, wank or anal)

Thanks a bunch for putting me off my morning tea.

Shudder.

Homosexuality should be illegal unless both chicks are hot.

Harry33

14th December 2006, 09:43

I'm sure it makes it look bigger or is it just mine lol.

14th December 2006, 09:44

Still have foreskin intact!

Al

SpankMe

14th December 2006, 09:50

I don't know how people can compare male & female circumcision. Maybe if the male got his top knob cut off in the procedure you could compare the two.

Male circumcision is no big deal and can not even be remotely compared to the barbarism that is female circumcision.

car

14th December 2006, 09:58

most english blokes have up until recently had the chop

I didn't think it was that common. Most of the English blokes I know are uncut. I know only three who have been circumcised, all of them as adults, for medical reasons.

placidfemme

14th December 2006, 09:59

it was found that one of the reasons women wanted babies chopped was 'cus it made washing babies dicks easier....nice one mum...

and they say female circumcision is barbaric....not alot in it, both are well wrong

As to the first point... I dunno much bout dandgly bits (being a lesbo and all) however... I know that my aunt wanted my cousin to not get the snip when he was born and remember her arguing with my grandpa about it just after his birth... and when my cousin was about 4 he was playing in the bath and pulled his skin too far back and his dick went purple and they had to circumsize him... can still hear my granpa's voice when my aunt rushed my cousin over there (being a single mum...) abd gramps saying "what did I tell you?" haha

Anyway... your second point... curcumsision for men does not affect them sexually... for a women female curcumsision actually prevents women from having an orgasim... thats why its mean...

Hitcher

14th December 2006, 10:02

Anyway... your second point... curcumsision for men does not affect them sexually... for a women female curcumsision actually prevents women from having an orgasim... thats why its mean...

You should read or experiment more. Stimulation of the clitoris is not the only way for women to achieve orgasm, so I'm told...

bugjuice

14th December 2006, 10:02

i keep hearing it's a myth anyway :eek:

i'm glad to be still in completely original condition, as per the day I escaped.

Karma

14th December 2006, 10:04

Joni

14th December 2006, 10:04

an orgasim... thats why its mean... ummm, and how about the pain and disfigurement, together with the psychological issues many of the woman who have this "procedure" done to them have to face... sorry i know you were talking lightly, but its a barbaric ritual that makes me sick to the pit of my stomach...

and yes Spank female and male cannot be compared.

LilSel

14th December 2006, 10:05

female curcumsision actually prevents women from having an orgasim...

and that is unjust!!

and its a hideous practice that also makes me feel sick!

placidfemme

14th December 2006, 10:08

You should read or experiment more. Stimulation of the clitoris is not the only way for women to achieve orgasm, so I'm told...

Believe me I'm aware of the different methods of making a women orgasim :yes:

However... think about it... seriously... the only cultures that still openly promote and use female curcumsision don't actually give a flying fuck whether the woman enjoys the sexual experience or not, most cultures actually do this to the women so that they have no sexual desire to cheat on the hubby (usually forced into the marraige in the first place). A lot of the Saudi and Indian women forced into these type situations are also forced to place salt in thier bits to keep themselves dry and tight for the hubby... causing a lot of extra pain to themselves, exspecially during sex... the women in africa that are circumsised are usally done in childhood, most of whom actually die from infections...

Hitcher

14th December 2006, 10:08

God, this was a perfectly good blokes' thread. And now the women have arrived. Could somebody please mention either beer, powertools or UNIX/Linux?

terbang

14th December 2006, 10:09

Stimulation of the clitoris is not the only way for women to achieve orgasm, so I'm told...

Yeah its big and it throbs between their legs. Their Motorcycles of course..!

bugjuice

14th December 2006, 10:10

God, this was a perfectly good blokes' thread. And now the women have arrived. Could somebody please mention either beer, powertools or UNIX/Linux?
ever tried drowning your todger in beer, while drilling a hole and surfing the 'net?
quite interesting I must say.

Joni

14th December 2006, 10:12

God, this was a perfectly good blokes' thread. And now the women have arrived. Could somebody please mention either beer, powertools or UNIX/Linux?Hitch, I sometimes question your motives... I presume that was supposed to be funny.

I reckon we all know Spank was talking about the male procedure...

Anyway, this stupid woman with her "opinions" will leave this conversation for the boys then....

Karma

14th December 2006, 10:14

Anyway, this stupid woman with her "opinions" will leave this conversation for the boys then....

<IMG SRC=http://freehandbag.oasis-design.com/kate.gif>

Easy girl, it's all a bit of a laugh in the end eh...

placidfemme

14th December 2006, 10:15

Hitch, I sometimes question your motives... I presume that was supposed to be funny.

I reckon we all know Spank was talking about the male procedure...

Anyway, this stupid woman with her "opinions" will leave this conversation for the boys then....

hmm... obviously its not a problem though when the boys take over biker angel threads... all the time...

SpankMe

14th December 2006, 10:19

A lot of the Saudi and Indian women forced into these type situations are also forced to place salt in thier bits to keep themselves dry and tight for the hubby...

Ouch!! :shit: I (and my gf) prefer it well lubricated thank you very much. :bleh:

Hitcher

14th December 2006, 10:19

hmm... obviously its not a problem though when the boys take over biker angel threads... all the time...

Yeah, but that's different. Obviously.

ManDownUnder

14th December 2006, 10:19

Anyway, this stupid woman with her "opinions" will leave this conversation for the boys then....

Bollox to that... pun fully intended.

This is an issue that affects both male and female - differently but it does. The original topic of male circumcision bring up issues of why it is/was done, effects on men, effects on sex, effects on HIV... and likely others I haven't considered.

I won't speak for Hitch - but if I'm too close to the subject and can have something pointed out (no pun intended that time), then go for it.

Female circumcision is something I know sod all about - but other than a trim and a rinse... I see no need for any adjustments in the normal course of events.

SpankMe

14th December 2006, 10:22

I also heard from someone that worked in a Saudi Hospital that most female problems were rectal failure from constantly being buggered by their husbands. :buggerd:

placidfemme

14th December 2006, 10:23

Ouch!! :shit: I (and my gf) prefer it well lubricated thank you very much. :bleh:

I think I typed it out wrong... what I meant was... they salt it up (so to say) to make the skin go tight... when they have sex, I have no doubt that they get wet like normal women, but the salting causes the skin to shrink and crack, so even if said woman is wet during sex, its still going to hurt

LilSel

14th December 2006, 10:24

I also heard from someone that worked in a Saudi Hospital that most female problems were rectal failure from constantly being buggered by their husbands. :buggerd:

That's what happens when you stitch up the natural one! :shit:

Hitcher

14th December 2006, 10:24

Beer! I'm sure somebody mentioned beer?

SpankMe

14th December 2006, 10:28

ugh, went to find some images off beer and sexy butt for ya Hitch, but was rather disturbed by the images I got when I did a Google image search for "beer butt"

Ixion

14th December 2006, 10:29

God, this was a perfectly good blokes' thread. And now the women have arrived. Could somebody please mention either beer, powertools or UNIX/Linux?

Farting. A good discussion on farts, the different varieties and their relative merits. That always sends the women away

crashe

14th December 2006, 10:31

Female circumsism - Done in some countries by barbaric doctors...
It is to show that the girl is still a virgin when she gets married.
At the time of the wedding the doctor undoes the stitches holding it all together.
They do it when the child is tiny and that child is not sedated at all.
The child is screaming their heads off.... some faint at the pain of it all.

It is BARBARIC and must be stopped.

The women/girl suffers with many women problems throughout there life when it has been done and the stitches removed.

It is illegal through out the world.

But it has still happened here in New Zealand within that culture.
Those caught are taken to court..... luckily not many do it here in NZ.

Male circumcisim - Jews do it as it is their culture.
During world war ll it was done on adult men, cos of the men not being able to clean themselves properly where they were stationed as they had buggar all water. So it was done on health and medical grounds.

Today it is still being done... so that the boy child will look like the daddy.......
Some women still prefer it to be done on keeping it clean etc...

There are many doctors today who refuse to do it.... so those women or men wanting their boy child done have to find a dr who will do it.

SpankMe - re: your last comment at Saudie Arabia and 'buggering'....
Yep the males feel that putting it up the backside of a male or female does not make them gay...
Its on the premis of, how else will they know what to do with it when they get married... they feel that they have to learn somehow..

Cos you know it is illegal to be gay in that country.

LilSel

14th December 2006, 10:33

Beer! I'm sure somebody mentioned beer?

Yes please :D

:apint:

SpankMe

14th December 2006, 10:34

Female circumsism - Done in some countries by barbaric doctors...

I doubt you could call the women who preform it in many villages "Doctors".

terbang

14th December 2006, 10:35

Beer! I'm sure somebody mentioned beer?

Hah reminds me...

What is a woman's arse hole doing while she is having an orgasim..?

Drinking beer with his mates...

ManDownUnder

14th December 2006, 10:36

ugh, went to find some images off beer and sexy butt for ya Hitch, but was rather disturbed by the images I got when I did a Google image search for "beer butt"

Try "Bare butt" and let us know what you find

Squeak the Rat

14th December 2006, 10:40

Just please please please do not type hair butt. You'll no doubt end up with some gay german porn....

crashe

14th December 2006, 10:41

I doubt you could call the women who preform it in many villages "Doctors".

Yeah they are more like "Witch doctors"

WRT

14th December 2006, 10:44

Yeah they are more like "Witch doctors"

Which doctors?

jrandom

14th December 2006, 10:46

I'd just like to clarify that I don't see male circumcision as in any way equivalent to female 'circumcision'; I only used the phrase 'barbaric' as hyperbole.

There isn't anything particularly nasty about circumcision of the penis, and in some situations, as commented on above, it can have advantages in terms of reducing health risks. In an enlightened society with plenty of soap, however, I consider it pointless.

Female genital mutilation, on the other hand, is a horrible crime.

LilSel

14th December 2006, 10:46

Wow... I never thought that I would learn all about circumcision off of KB...
Interesting discussions going on

SpankMe

14th December 2006, 10:48

In an enlightened society with plenty of soap, however, I consider it pointless.

Yeah, but I think my old man knew I'd grow up to be a lazy cunt.

Squeak the Rat

14th December 2006, 10:55

Do vegan chicks only go out with circumcised guys? It's probably safer....

dawnrazor

14th December 2006, 10:56

Blody hell...before I'm hung up by my fore skin for suggesting that female chop is better or worse then male chop....I really only meant to imply that both are heinous deeds, albeit the women snip thing being a far more unpleasent and brutal act then the relative toe nail clipping that is the male snip...........wouldn't wish either on anyone

Motu

14th December 2006, 10:59

What a useless poll - where's the ''It doesn't matter anymore'' option?

SixPackBack

14th December 2006, 11:34

Female circumcision...WTF? musta been hidin' under a rock when that conversation came around...link to the procedure anyone?

LilSel

14th December 2006, 11:37

Female circumcision...WTF? musta been hidin' under a rock when that conversation came around...link to the procedure anyone?

http://www.nocirc.org/publish/pamphlet9.html

:sick: :sick:

(not graphic, only diagrams... but still :sick: )

jrandom

14th December 2006, 11:39

Female circumcision...WTF? musta been hidin' under a rock when that conversation came around...link to the procedure anyone?

It essentially involves taking a knife to a girl's genitals and making them nonfunctional to a greater or lesser extent.

Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_circumcision) has it covered.

Indiana_Jones

14th December 2006, 11:40

There are many men who are married/partner, will frequent the cruise places to have it off with other men (BJ, wank or anal)

What sort of marriage is that ? lol

I'm not cut, Don't think I really want to be too :scooter:

-Indy

The Stranger

14th December 2006, 12:00

Darwinism or creationism?

Either way, I am sure if it shouldn't be there you wouldn't be born with it.

I must admit however, I haven't spent any time studying the pros and cons of male foreskins, so I shall defer to MDU's obviously superior knowledge on the subject.

Hitcher

14th December 2006, 12:11

Do vegan chicks only go out with circumcised guys? It's probably safer....

But raw meat is against their religion. And anyway, who in their right mind would date a vegan?

LilSel

14th December 2006, 12:12

Lol..... 48463

Maha

14th December 2006, 12:14

Either way, I am sure if it shouldn't be there you wouldn't be born with it.

Oh yeah?...well look what the creator did with all the left over elbow skin?

He was just fucken' around a few thousand years ago....having a laugh with the lads at the human shop....:yes:

terbang

14th December 2006, 12:32

http://www.nocirc.org/publish/pamphlet9.html

:sick: :sick:

(not graphic, only diagrams... but still :sick: )

Not a pretty scene. About the only bit thats been left alone is item 8..!

LilSel

14th December 2006, 12:36

Not a pretty scene. About the only bit thats been left alone is item 8..!

Left by the 'doctors/barbarians' but not the hubbys by the sounds of it :shit:

Maha

14th December 2006, 12:39

Not a pretty scene. About the only bit thats been left alone is item 8..!

Looks like a sketch from the 'Childrens Television Workshop'........

Squeak the Rat

14th December 2006, 12:39

I feel kinda queasy.

Back off track: Vegans (shudder). Vegatarians are ok though. Whilst it makes dinner times a boring and often painful affair, you do have the benefit of encouraging them to supplement their protein intake.

Make way for the iron sausage.....

Edbear

14th December 2006, 12:49

...wouldn't wish either on anyone

Not at 19 when you're just coming out of the anaesthetic and the Nurse takes a look and says, "Hold still a minute, I think it needs another stitch!":gob:

ManDownUnder

14th December 2006, 12:56

Having done a spot of reading on Female Circumcision... and at the risk of quoting Rove

WHAT THE...???

:nono:

jrandom

14th December 2006, 12:57

WHAT THE...???

Ah. An innocent.

Amazing what darkies get up to when you take your eye off them, eh?

Hillbilly

14th December 2006, 13:16

I went out with a vegetarian/vegan once. Never again! One night I made the smart remark "I thought you said you didn't eat meat".....she sunk her teeth in! :shutup:

Ghost Lemur

14th December 2006, 14:14

Here's a story for you.

For medical reasons future biker had to be circumcised at age 2. On doctors orders he obviously can't wear any clothes for a couple of weeks. Thankfully it's the height of summer (back when we used to get those) so his mum let him run around naked. Nana didn't approve of said future biker forever running around naked so mum (who didn't like nana) put future biker in a dress for the next two weeks.

AND TOOK LOTS OF PICS.

/off to therapist.

krash

14th December 2006, 14:22

if anyone can be bothered, download "Penn and Tellers Bullshit" series. season 3 episode 1 its about the snip. Its very good + funny :whocares:

SixPackBack

14th December 2006, 14:26

Having done a spot of reading on Female Circumcision... and at the risk of quoting Rove

WHAT THE...???

:nono:

10 characters.....fucken animals

ManDownUnder

14th December 2006, 14:31

10 characters.....fucken animals

Agreed.

But (not condoning it...) why do they do it? How do those groups/cultures rationalise and justify it?

crashe

14th December 2006, 14:42

Agreed.

But (not condoning it...) why do they do it? How do those groups/cultures rationalise and justify it?

The way I understand it is that they dont want SHAME brought onto their family..

So to prove that the girl is a virgin they do this... as there is no other way for them to prove that the girl hasnt slept around.

Ok There is the hyman but I guess they dont know about that :whistle:
Occassionally the hyman can be broken without penentration.

The girls are held down why they are being tortured having this brutal act done upon them.

It is outlawed, but it is still happening.

Karma

14th December 2006, 14:45

Agreed.

But (not condoning it...) why do they do it? How do those groups/cultures rationalise and justify it?

Mate, trying to understand those cultures is like trying to understand women... it ain't never gonna happen.

All you can do is accept the inevitable and get on with it.

Hitcher

14th December 2006, 15:13

The girls are held down why they are being tortured having this brutal act done upon them.

Really? You're kidding me...

Toaster

14th December 2006, 17:09

If being a good boy/girl ain't an option, try hand-jobs.

mstriumph

14th December 2006, 18:24

...................................You never know what your partner is up to... as you are not with them 24/7.
They also dont know, what you are up to 24/7 either.

There are many men who are married/partner, will frequent the cruise places to have it off with other men (BJ, wank or anal)

So please ALL BE SAFE and USE CONDOMS.:yes:

understand where you are coming from
but i don't want to live in a world where there's no trust

or mangos ....... or smoked salmon ...... or BIKES :love:

mstriumph

14th December 2006, 18:27

Agreed.

But (not condoning it...) why do they do it? How do those groups/cultures rationalise and justify it?

as i understand it, its to make vaginal intercourse so painful and wretched and unpleasurable that a man knows his wife is unlikely to stray ......

barbaric 'tis ........

oldrider

14th December 2006, 18:47

I tried to get my foreskin put back on when I was old enough to understand what had been done to me as a baby.
There was no ACC then but it was done by the State Hospital system of the day.
I wanted to get it back, I demanded it back but they would not listen, I feel aggrieved, humiliated and abused.
I demand compensation, it should be worth a few bob too, diminished enjoyment of life pleasures.
How do any of these experts know that the piece of foreskin removed wasn't the piece that gives you all the jollies or at least about 10%.
I have been sexually active for 53 years averaging at least one orgasm a day, that's 10% of 53x365, that's a lot of sensitivity that they have stolen from me! There is no bloody justice I want compensation!
I wonder what they did with it? :gob: Aggrieved, John.

Karma

14th December 2006, 19:03

I have been sexually active for 53 years averaging at least one orgasm a day, that's 10% of 53x365.

Yeh... I'm saving up my allowence eh, gonna take a holiday and use up a couple of years worth :D

riffer

14th December 2006, 19:33

How do any of these experts know that the piece of foreskin removed wasn't the piece that gives you all the jollies or at least about 10%.
I have been sexually active for 53 years averaging at least one orgasm a day, that's 10% of 53x365, that's a lot of sensitivity that they have stolen from me! There is no bloody justice I want compensation!

You might want to google "foreskin stretching". Plenty of articles about men who've successfully restored their foreskin. Just takes perseverance and time.

But better off to console yourself - you've had 19,345 more orgasms than the poor girl that got circumcised.

Hitcher

14th December 2006, 19:43

I wonder what they did with it?

The circumcisers keep them, have them tanned and then, when they have enough, made into these cute little wallets that turn into a suitcase when gently fondled...

They can also be made into eyewear cases for the circumspect.

Maha

14th December 2006, 21:05

Just please please please do not type hair butt. You'll no doubt end up with some gay german porn....

The circumcisers keep them, have them tanned and then, when they have enough, made into these cute little wallets that turn into a suitcase when gently fondled...

They can also be made into eyewear cases for the circumspect.

Without doubt....the funniest shit i have read in a long time.....thanks guys..:killingme
Squeak?....cant give you any more greenies mate but will try Hitcher, would much rather shout you a rum....:drinknsin

Biohazard

14th December 2006, 21:47

got to be the weirdest poll i've ever voted on.....

keep ya coats on guys :shutup:

ceebie13

15th December 2006, 11:40

I'm half Jewish....I have a twoskin!

ceebie13

15th December 2006, 11:45

You might want to google "foreskin stretching".

Ha! Imagine Mrs CB finding that on my computer's history!

flyingscotsman

15th December 2006, 12:01

Us Scottish folks are too bloody mean to cut bits off !!. :rockon:

McJim

15th December 2006, 12:38

Us Scottish folks are too bloody mean to cut bits off !!. :rockon:

Besides - it's two bloody cold in Scotland to deny the wee fella a balaclava don't you think? It's modern too, makes yer dick look like he's wearing a wee hoodie.

flyingscotsman

15th December 2006, 12:44

Cold in Scotland...........toughen up ya jessie.

Your comment about the hoodie got me thinking ..... maybe we could start a clothing range for willy.!!!

crashe

15th December 2006, 13:04

Cold in Scotland...........toughen up ya jessie.

Your comment about the hoodie got me thinking ..... maybe we could start a clothing range for willy.!!!

Too late its already been done.........
Well here in NZ there are many willy covers that have been knitted and can be brought at adult shops around NZ..

Oh and they come in different sizes.......
Its not a case of one size fits all........ :rofl:

flyingscotsman

15th December 2006, 13:07

Thanks Crashe. Not sure about the knitted cardy look, I'm thinking more along the lines of the Karen Walker / Swandri sort of thing. Style plus functionality....might have to got & research a bit more .... hmmm adult shops you say......

Damon

15th December 2006, 13:11

My mum made the decision for me, "apparently" there was some bullshit medical crap recomending it at the time, but on a happy side, the girls i've met/fed it to, say they prefer it that way, or maybe they were trying to make me feel good about my inadequacies, in which case a woman did it to me in the first place so it's their fault

Maha

15th December 2006, 13:16

Too late its already been done.........
Well here in NZ there are many willy covers that have been knitted and can be brought at adult shops around NZ..

Oh and they come in different sizes.......
Its not a case of one size fits all........ :rofl:

Yes, and i know someone who knitted one recently....um not for me tho'.......:o

crashe

15th December 2006, 13:22

Yes, and i know someone who knitted one recently....um not for me tho'.......:o

Why is your's THAT small that they cant knit one to fit....:dodge:

*running for cover so to speak.........* hehehehehehehe :whistle:

Maha

15th December 2006, 13:26

Why is your's THAT small that they cant knit one to fit....:dodge:

*running for cover so to speak.........* hehehehehehehe :whistle:

Hey?...wadda ya reckon happen to the wool that came off Shriek???.....:yes:

crashe

15th December 2006, 13:55

Hey?...wadda ya reckon happen to the wool that came off Shriek???.....:yes:

No, no, no you got my meaning all wrong......

I meant THAT tiny "_" that it can't be seen.....

*now really running for cover from Maha man and Mom*

ManDownUnder

15th December 2006, 13:59

People used to think I had a weenie willy.. till the guy I was standing next to realised I actually don't have a right leg.

It's not so bad and putting on the rear brake with yer willy's ok so long as the boot is adjusted to fit nicely.

Those :love: bumpy :love: roads :love: can be very nice too....

mstriumph

15th December 2006, 14:20

I'm half Jewish....I have a twoskin!

dunno? could be a top/bottom split, or front/back ...... only a twoskin if it's left/right surely?! :dodge:

mstriumph

15th December 2006, 14:31

..................... mum (who didn't like nana) put future biker in a dress for the next two weeks.

AND TOOK LOTS OF PICS.

/off to therapist.

you sweet little old-fashioned thang you!! :yes:

[until the 1920's 'twas quite common for boys up to the age of 4 or 5 to wear frocks breeching of boys (http://histclo.usanethosting.com/style/skirted/dress/breech.html)]

MisterD

15th December 2006, 14:37

Swandri sort of thing.

Jeez, that'd be a bit scratchy for me, is this some wool fetish you sweaties have with your checked skirts and whatnot?

Panther

6th July 2007, 14:20

Well, guys, I've always wondered about the distribution of circumcised gentlemen in our population. All suspicions you might have to the contrary, I myself don't have a statistically valid sample to derive from, so please, respond away.

It'd be interesting to identify the point in time where the popularity of the operation started to wane. I get the impression that the 1980s were a turning point in that regard.

Comments from the girls on the subject would be most interesting, too.

Flame away!

SARGE

6th July 2007, 14:22

canarlee

6th July 2007, 14:32

I didn't think it was that common. Most of the English blokes I know are uncut. I know only three who have been circumcised, all of them as adults, for medical reasons.

what he said!!! only i dont know any bloke from england who has had the snip except for 3 jewish friends i went to school with!

oh and im still all there too thanks

007XX

6th July 2007, 14:43

Isn't this when we get a really hot chick with a nurse uniform to get you boys to line up, drop your drawers and see what comes up???

Purely for scientific accuracy of course!!!:laugh:

ManDownUnder

6th July 2007, 14:57

back on subject, none of my mates are cut that i know of nor myself, actually i think one is cu shis grandma is a jew or something. kill the jews!!! we need to have running of the jews 2007, hopefully they lay a jew egg or something eh. be great fun.

Dude - who stuck a cactus up your arse?

The original question from Panther... (and I quote) "I've always wondered about the distribution of circumcised gentlemen in our population."

Does this poll not exactly answer that question? Shoot me down on this one please... I'm even open to symantics but...

SARGE

6th July 2007, 15:00

N4CR

6th July 2007, 15:04

dude - who stuck a cactus up your ****?

the original question from panther... (and i quote) "i've always wondered about the distribution of circumcised gentlemen in our population."

does this poll not exactly answer that question? shoot me down on this one please... i'm even open to symantics but...

' circumcision 'cuts' hiv infection'

title has nothing to do with it. although the joined post asks same as the poll, it wasn't anything to do with the title of the post and the main reason (to provide a news article). the question was a secondary part. should not have been moved.

cactuses make a big ***y time. i like!

ManDownUnder

6th July 2007, 15:11

' circumcision 'cuts' hiv infection'

title has nothing to do with it. although the joined post asks same as the poll, it wasn't anything to do with the title of the post and the main reason (to provide a news article). the question was a secondary part. should not have been moved.

cactuses make a big ***y time. i like!

Spank asked "So who's been cut?" and set up a poll delivering the ratio of cut to non cut to other to women..

ok

Panther then said "Well, guys, I've always wondered about the distribution of circumcised gentlemen in our population. All suspicions you might have to the contrary, I myself don't have a statistically valid sample to derive from, so please, respond away. "

One answered the question then posed by another...

Or did I kinda miss something?

007XX

6th July 2007, 17:16

All arguing apart, I still think of it as the "purple headed Darth Vador"....:laugh:

Wether he has a sweater at the time??....:whocares:

ManDownUnder

6th July 2007, 17:30

All arguing apart, I still think of it as the "purple headed Darth Vador"....:laugh:

Wether he has a sweater at the time??....:whocares:

Oh that's classy!!!!!!! :dodge:

LMFAO!

SARGE

6th July 2007, 17:33

All arguing apart, I still think of it as the "purple headed Darth Vador"....:laugh:

Wether he has a sweater at the time??....:whocares:

never has so much been said in so few words ...

007XX

6th July 2007, 17:38

never has so much been said in so few words ...

Yeah, that's it!!!:yes:

Oh that's classy!!!!!!! :dodge:

LMFAO!

Classy is very overrated...:nya:

C3H5(NO3)

6th July 2007, 19:21

Like the banning of Bullrush, this is the sort of thing that happens when women are allowed to have a say on things that affect men's llives.

that sucked!
we all got afterschools for playing that game!
so we took to playing rugby with the same rules.
then that got banned
so we took to bashing eachother with rubish bins

C3H5(NO3)

6th July 2007, 19:24

This article has been around for a little while.

There are many men who are married/partner, will frequent the cruise places to have it off with other men (BJ, wank or anal)

So please ALL BE SAFE and USE CONDOMS.:yes:

where in fucks name did you get that from?

SpankMe

6th June 2008, 11:19

jrandom

6th June 2008, 11:34

Panther then said "Well, guys, I've always wondered about the distribution of circumcised gentlemen in our population. All suspicions you might have to the contrary, I myself don't have a statistically valid sample to derive...

:laugh:

You so know it was me writing that, don'tcha...

rachprice

6th June 2008, 11:51

Its not a commonly used practice in 1st world countries i.e NZ, its mainly for countries in sub-sarharan Africa where HIV is rife. It has been shown in a few papers to confer resistance to HIV but also to a few other genital medical problems (genital ulcer disease). IMO anything that prevents 50% of cases of HIV acquisition in a continent with 34 million people affected is worth it!
I dont think it will become common practice here.

sinfull

6th June 2008, 11:59

Watched a doco of SKY last night called The Valley of Life or Death (http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2000/valley_hiv.shtml). Apparently why circumcision helps protect against HIV is that HIV can't penetrate the skin on a penis (but can in the arse and vagina) unless there is a cut/opening in the skin, but the foreskin soaks up the HIV infection like sponge.

Seen a thing on some news program last night where they have found that estrogen cream stops the absorbsion of the aids virus through the foreskin !
Estrogen= women = if everyone was to stick to stickin it to women, the race will survive !

peasea

6th June 2008, 21:01

Seen a thing on some news program last night where they have found that estrogen cream stops the absorbsion of the aids virus through the foreskin !
Estrogen= women = if everyone was to stick to stickin it to women, the race will survive !

"Stick to stickin it" great line, could be applied to a lot of things but you're right; I can't get my head around bonking anything/anyone but a female human. It doesn't make sense to bonk anything else, the natural order of things actually requires it.

So, if you ever accidentally walk into a gay bar don't offer to push anyone's stool in and if you're a smoker never, ever, try to bum a fag.

Pussy

6th June 2008, 21:06

So, if you ever accidentally walk into a gay bar don't offer to push anyone's stool in and if you're a smoker never, ever, try to bum a fag.

Or use the exclamation "Fuck me"

peasea

6th June 2008, 21:10

Or use the exclamation "Fuck me"

Or worse; "bugger me"
Or even "Toss you for the next round"

Mrs Busa Pete

8th December 2009, 15:26

yungatart

8th December 2009, 15:29

Oh, the poor wee kid...that is awful!
Butchery, I would call it, rather than surgery, Wendy.
Hope the poor fella is feeling better now...

None of my boys are circumcised, I think it is barbaric, unless there is a medical reason for doing it.

Nasty

8th December 2009, 15:31

Totally babaric ... if its not required for real medical reason then there is no need.

The poor lad ... what bloody doctor "forgets" pain meds ...

glegge

8th December 2009, 15:33

barbaric :bash::gob:

Mully

8th December 2009, 15:33

Nah, I don't see the point of it

(Plus I can't spare it)

Trudes

8th December 2009, 15:33

I don't see the point unless it is being done for religious or medical reasons, I know it has been done a lot for "cosmetic" purposes, but personally having being on the receiving end of cut and un-cut I prefer un-cut.:innocent: It just seems unnecessarily cruel and pointless to me. Then again I don't actually have a cock so don't really know what a pain in the arse (:shutup:) a foreskin can be.

Swoop

8th December 2009, 15:33

the surgon forgot to give him a pain blocker...

Fucking medical retards!:bash:
Should have just stuck to burning couches at Otago Uni...:bash:

Juzz976

8th December 2009, 15:34

I thought in alot of cases it was an aesthetic thing, read somewhere chicks prefer circumcised.
I never thought about it untill my son was born didn't know what to do.
I guess alot of new parents wouldn't either.

Pussy

8th December 2009, 15:34

Yep... someone was looking for a fanbelt for a Kenworth at the time.....

StoneY

8th December 2009, 15:35

Agree with barbaric, no need for it, imagine the trauma the newborns suffer

Poor kid, hope he recovers soon

Trudes

8th December 2009, 15:37

I thought in alot of cases it was an aesthetic thing, read somewhere chicks prefer circumcised.

Is that like "Chicks dig scars"??
Penis scars are not that sexy.:mellow:

Headbanger

8th December 2009, 15:38

I'm still a bit put out my parents organized getting a part of my penis removed without consulting me.

If they had waited a few years until I could make an informed decision, it would have been along the lines of "FUCK NO, YOU CRAZY FUCKHEADS"

steel001

8th December 2009, 15:40

I thought in alot of cases it was an aesthetic thing, read somewhere chicks prefer circumcised...

That's what the girls tell me too.

P.s. I'm circumcised

firefighter

8th December 2009, 15:41

if i had a boy i would of got it done with in days of his birth.

I take it you had your girls circumcised then? (female eqivalent) Or is it only ok to do this barbaric shit to baby boys?

Oh and I hope you kicked the doc between the legs.

YellowDog

8th December 2009, 15:42

Poor bugger.

Dick hygene is pretty important for little boys.

No I haven't been circumstised but I understand that it is routine in the USA.

Mrs Busa Pete

8th December 2009, 15:43

I take it you had your girls circumcised then? (female eqivalent) Or is it only ok to do this barbaric shit to baby boys?

Well no but it's no more barbaric than having to do it when they are 8

FlangMasterJ

8th December 2009, 15:46

Eight years old? What's the cut-off point?

Stirts

8th December 2009, 15:48

What's the cut-off point?

Just below the knob!! :rolleyes:

Pussy

8th December 2009, 15:48

Eight years old? What's the cut-off point?

The bit at the end....

SPman

8th December 2009, 15:48

Beware the uncircumcised!

Str8 Jacket

8th December 2009, 15:49

Eight years old? What's the cut-off point?

I think this is a *serious* thread dude. You can't be going and making jokes like that...

firefighter

8th December 2009, 15:49

Well no but it's no more barbaric than having to do it when they are 8

Same for the girls should they need the same proceedure at 8 for medical reasons.

Trudes

8th December 2009, 15:49

What's the cut-off point?

Just below the head??? :laugh:

FlangMasterJ

8th December 2009, 15:51

I think this is a *serious* thread dude. You can't be going and making jokes like that...

I was. :shutup:

Edit: No bling for that pearler??

gatch

8th December 2009, 15:51

Brutal ! Having no fore would be like having a vivid with no lid haha.

StoneY

8th December 2009, 15:54

Well no but it's no more barbaric than having to do it when they are 8

Thats hardly any justification....its simply barbaric and not required

The ONLY reason for doing it is a rare condition that the foreskin is too small for the growing penis, anything else is vanity, laziness, or religion based

Basic hygiene practised and its not required at all

p.dath

8th December 2009, 15:57

You should have attached a poll.

Would be interesting no why people have been circumsized as well. I'm guessing it is because here parents wanted them to be (as in, had no say in the matter).

Mrs Busa Pete

8th December 2009, 15:58

Same for the girls should they need the same proceedure at 8 for medical reasons.

Well no because as far as I know girls in this country don't and havn't ever been circumcised. Don't get me wrong here because i don't know if i would of it would of had to be dicussed with the doctors and my then husband who was circumcised (Mind you he should of had his cock cut off all together).

Pussy

8th December 2009, 15:59

my then husband who was circumcised (Mind you he should of had his cock cut off all together).

You two have a few cross words, huh?

AllanB

8th December 2009, 16:09

Yeah – and at birth they should remove everyone’s appendix just in case it plays up, or toe-nails in case they become ingrown.

A pointless exercise unless required for medical reasons.

Pointless for religious reasons as well IMO. Tell me why the world gets upset over the brutalisation of female genitals in some countries but believes the circumcision of males under the banner of religion to be acceptable? Both are evil.

Mrs Busa Pete

8th December 2009, 16:12

Thats hardly any justification....its simply barbaric and not required

The ONLY reason for doing it is a rare condition that the foreskin is too small for the growing penis, anything else is vanity, laziness, or religion based

Basic hygiene practised and its not required at all

Well obviously at 8 it was medical or are you just saying he is unhygienic

firefighter

8th December 2009, 16:13

Well no because as far as I know girls in this country don't and havn't ever been circumcised. Don't get me wrong here because i don't know if i would of it would of had to be dicussed with the doctors and my then husband who was circumcised (Mind you he should of had his cock cut off all together).

Parrotting everyone else, it's a pointless prceedure. It's cruel and unneccessary.

To have it done as a baby instead of 8 is neither here or there......
You could also say better at 8 than at 30......Why? Because it's in the past and forgotten.

People are used to babies crying, so it's not as big a deal, that does'nt mean it's not in some real agony.

Men that are circumcised later on in life generally regret it. They report a major decline in sexual pleasure.

For a proceedure done without medical reason it's not really cricket now is it?

Imagine your clit was cut off at birth because it's the norm like in tribal communities.It's not exactly the same but it's close.

Mrs Busa Pete

8th December 2009, 16:17

A pointless exercise unless required for medical reasons.

Tell me why the world gets upset over the brutalisation of female genitals in some countries but believes the circumcision of males under the banner of religion to be acceptable? Both are evil.

Well to tell you the truth i don't even know why they do it to women.

And if and i say if i had a boy and was going to get it done as stated above it would of been because his dad was.

PrincessBandit

8th December 2009, 16:20

Two cases reported in the news this afternoon of a 4 year old whose op was botched, necessitating emergency surgery; which had followed a 14 year old boy who had it done and was screaming the place down apparently, despite having the max dose of morphine.

I think it used to be a "cultural" thing here a generation or so ago - you know the old "circumsised at 8 days" thing.

Personally I see no reason for it at all, unless there is a medical reason.

p.s. I did wonder with the cases I just mentioned first whether it was a "non native Kiwi" cultural situation, especially since the procedure was being assisted by a doctor who isn't even certified to practice here???.....???

Headbanger

8th December 2009, 16:21

Well to tell you the truth i don't even know why they do it to women.

So they can't experience sexual pleasure.

PrincessBandit

8th December 2009, 16:22

Well to tell you the truth i don't even know why they do it to women.

Sorry for not quoting before - you posted this while i was busy typing. I think the girl thing is largely to do with denying them sexual pleasure, regarded as inappropriate in some cultures. Thankfully not here!!!!

Mrs Busa Pete

8th December 2009, 16:27

Parrotting everyone else, it's a pointless prceedure. It's cruel and unneccessary.

To have it done as a baby instead of 8 is neither here or there......
You could also say better at 8 than at 30......Why? Because it's in the past and forgotten.

People are used to babies crying, so it's not as big a deal, that does'nt mean it's not in some real agony.

Men that are circumcised later on in life generally regret it. They report a major decline in sexual pleasure.

For a proceedure done without medical reason it's not really cricket now is it?

Imagine your clit was cut off at birth because it's the norm like in tribal communities.It's not exactly the same but it's close.

Well really this is all hypothetical as i didn't have boys and by the sounds of it im glad. Mind you i do have 6 grandsons and now only 1 of them are done.

BikerDazz

8th December 2009, 16:31

Back in my baby days it was apparently standard procedure for boys.
My kids are girls but if I had a boy I'd only ever consider it if the quack convinced me it was medically necessary.

Actually, there was a pretty funny and ridiculous documentary about a support group of circumsised men (in NZ) who were up in arms about being brutalised and were attaching weight to the skin of their wee fullas to try to regrow a foreskin! Fuck it was so pathetic but you had to laugh:laugh:

Qkchk

8th December 2009, 16:35

Hey Mrs, it wasn't this doctor?

Botched circumcision puts four-year-old in hospital (http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10614250&ref=rss)

I can understand that some young lads do need the op to 'free willy' but when the poor chaps haven't had a 'local' for their wee fellas, THATS GONNA HURT!

Most guys I know who are chopped are proud of their status...... easy to keep clean too.

Ronin

8th December 2009, 16:37

Well really this is all hypothetical as i didn't have boys and by the sounds of it im glad. Mind you i do have 6 grandsons and now only 1 of them are done.

My son is 11 and I we were told when he was born that the only way it could be done was to go private and pay for it. Not that I would have had it done in the first place.

When I was done, painkillers were not used at all. It was the norm for a 1 or 2 day old baby to be strapped down and snipped.

I was done because my father was done, who was done because his father was done etc.

Fucken barbaric if you ask me. not that they did......

AllanB

8th December 2009, 16:37

I think the girl thing is largely to do with denying them sexual pleasure, !

Correct - a practice designed by uneducated evil men. Preformed by village elder women often with a broken bit of glass (I saw a documentary where one used a broken bit of Coke bottle!). No pain killer at all, preformed at sexual maturity.
A rite of passage usually resulting in severe infection and sometimes death.

Sickening.

Mrs Busa Pete

8th December 2009, 16:43

Sidewinder

8th December 2009, 16:47

i reckon you should leave that shit alone and not cut a man cock

Qkkid

8th December 2009, 16:57

:shit:I think its cleaner, easier to clean, it looks handsomer :wari:
:gob:And just on those 2 reasons ya get more blowjobs:woohoo:

neels

8th December 2009, 16:57

It used to be the normal thing to do, so people got it done.

Now it's not the normal thing to do, so people don't get it done.

When we had our boys we didn't, their willies haven't got dirty and infected and fallen off so obviously the hygiene thing was a complete crock.

At least as a baby there would be no memory, getting it done as an 8 year old I suspect it would stay with you forever....:bye:

Owl

8th December 2009, 17:05

I was led to believe circumcision was war related.

So many soldiers in the desert with serious infections got circumcised. They return from war and have kids like them etc.:innocent:

allycatz

8th December 2009, 17:11

At work several of our residents are uncircumsized, the young caregivers wont go near cleaning under foreskins. Not a pleasant job when it gets ignored

Mrs Busa Pete

8th December 2009, 17:40

I was led to believe circumcision was war related.

So many soldiers in the desert with serious infections got circumcised. They return from war and have kids like them etc.:innocent:

Well now that you say that i can remember hearing that as well.

Number One

8th December 2009, 17:49

No...I have not been circumsized. Neither has our boy. Didn't think there was a need and it wasn't suggested or even raised at all.

I dated a guy when I was 21 that had to go and get his done...he same age. THAT was a passion killer for sure. Poor bugger! The whole package looked like a swollen grapefruit and the stitches through his shaft were really mean looking oh and the morning glory was not appreciated. I remember waking up with a start one morning to him screaming beside me....ripped stitches from the little fella doing the old morning 'rise and shine' :pinch:

peasea

8th December 2009, 17:51

At work several of our residents are uncircumsized, the young caregivers wont go near cleaning under foreskins. Not a pleasant job when it gets ignored

Poor old buggers; imagine not being capable of washing your own dick! I'm not looking forward to that day, I really enjoy shower time.

Trudes

8th December 2009, 17:53

Poor old buggers; imagine not being capable of washing your own dick! I'm not looking forward to that day, I really enjoy shower time.

Oh bullshit! You'd love some little nursey washing your pee pee for you when you're too old to hold it yourself!;)

peasea

8th December 2009, 17:54

Oh bullshit! You'd love some little nursey washing your pee pee for you when you're too old to hold it yourself!;)

The very thought sickens me.

StoneY

8th December 2009, 18:08

The very thought sickens me.

Me too for sure...she should be washing my pee pee not yours, total waste of resource washing you man
:lol:

tri boy

8th December 2009, 18:31

The kid will get over it.
Plus have a splendid helmet that women will happily gag on for the rest of his life.
Turtle heads are hideous, and should be laughed at in the gym locker room:innocent:

pete376403

8th December 2009, 18:48

Yes for me, no for my boys, no for their boys either.

I've heard that desert story too. Plus it's a Jewish thing. (Moses said to god "you say we are your chosen people and you want us to cut off our WHAT?!!")

Hitcher

8th December 2009, 20:31

"Barbaric" my arse. Surprisingly it's mostly women who get upset about male circumcision. I have yet to meet anybody who has been scarred emotionally by having their foreskin removed as a young infant, other than whiney Green Party voters.

I have always been flummoxed by gizmos with too many moving parts. It is with some relief I commend my parents' foresight in this regard.

YellowDog

8th December 2009, 20:33

So far as I know, all American males are circumstised as a matter of course, reardless of religion.

Apparently it's a health thing and you are also less likely to pass things to partners.
(let's hope Tiger Woods had it done)

gammaguy

8th December 2009, 20:36

MY 8 year old grandson had to go and get circumised last week the poor wee man i f*ck that must of hurt.

When he woke up they had to call his mum down to recovery because the surgon forgot to give him a pain blocker (Prick) and my daughter said he screaming the place down.

Why did they ever stop doeing that. I dont know because i only ever had girls but i think if i had a boy i would of got it done with in days of his birth.

What's your thoughts

my son is "all there"and so am i

his mum me and him all beleive circumcision is cruel and un necessary.

Its a barbaric and outdated practise.

its all about choices and IMHO it removes one from a person who is too young to decide for themselves.If they want to be "cut"when they get older,and can say so clearly and plainly,i would not oppose it.

I am glad my parents gave me the choice

scissorhands

8th December 2009, 20:42

I'm all there and no kids of mine will be scarred and wounded by societies post religious mores and non sense

ManDownUnder

8th December 2009, 20:43

I am - it was the done thing when I was a kid... routine and a bit like docking lambs tails I think. I was a baby - I don't remember it.

It was a question that came up when our little boy was born - it was discussed for awhole 30 seconds and we came to the conclusion - no. There was no reasonable answer that justified it... not even close.

So... no

XxKiTtiExX

8th December 2009, 20:46

If it wasn't meant to be there you wouldn't be born with it. How ever, personally I do feel that its a decision for my son to make for himself when he is old enough to understand and make that decision (whatever his choice I would respect that). Unless there is a medical reason why it needs to be done, then for now it stays. (Much to the disgust of his father).

Trudes

8th December 2009, 20:53

Ok. Enough of the gibba gabba, SHOW US YOUR COCK!!!! ;)

riffer

8th December 2009, 20:54

Ok. Enough of the gibba gabba, SHOW US YOUR COCK!!!! ;)

Why bother? They all look the same anyway.

As for me, cut.

Pussy

8th December 2009, 20:57

Ok. Enough of the gibba gabba, SHOW US YOUR COCK!!!! ;)

There... just flashed it at you!

scumdog

8th December 2009, 20:57

Totally babaric ... if its not required for real medical reason then there is no need.
...

There IS real reason!:yes:

Without circumcision he would blokes ever have Round-heads vs Cavaliers pillow-fights in the barracks on a boring evening???:blink:

Genie

8th December 2009, 20:59

as a girl..no not circumcised and neither of my boys are. unless the foreskin is way too long it's not needed. teach them hygiene. anyway, you read the news on stuff.co. young boy had an artery cut....shit...poor boy will have some issues there.

Ramius

8th December 2009, 21:00

Once you're married, it doesn't matter if you are or aren't. It's not likely to ever be used again anyway. :gob:

Hitcher

8th December 2009, 21:03

If it wasn't meant to be there you wouldn't be born with it.

1. Nonsense. Please explain your appendix.

How ever, personally I do feel that its a decision for my son to make for himself when he is old enough to understand and make that decision (whatever his choice I would respect that).

2. The whole "choice" thing is a fallacious argument. Nobody in their right mind is going to let anybody draw blood on their dick, general anaethesia or otherwise. If it's not done to newborns, it's not going to happen.

Unless there is a medical reason why it needs to be done, then for now it stays. (Much to the disgust of his father).

3. Again there is an assumption that the "medical reason" is something that will afflict the foreskin's wearer. Circumcision can reduce the risks of urinary tract infections. More importantly it can reduce the risk of transmitting some STDs.

4. Please let's not get into any psychobabble about the intensity of women's orgasms.

Trudes

8th December 2009, 21:06

Ribbed for her pleasure. That's all I have to say about that.

gammaguy

8th December 2009, 21:10

Ok. Enough of the gibba gabba, SHOW US YOUR COCK!!!! ;)

so maybe KB needs "you show me yours and ill show you mine"thread:innocent:

Sidewinder

8th December 2009, 21:11

Ribbed for her pleasure. That's all I have to say about that.

ask around and you may hear alot about mine:wari::wari:

crazyhorse

8th December 2009, 21:14

MY 8 year old grandson had to go and get circumised last week the poor wee man i f*ck that must of hurt.

When he woke up they had to call his mum down to recovery because the surgon forgot to give him a pain blocker (Prick) and my daughter said he screaming the place down.

Why did they ever stop doeing that. I dont know because i only ever had girls but i think if i had a boy i would of got it done with in days of his birth.

What's your thoughts

We wanted our son done - but he was jaundiced when born and they wouldn't do it. However, like your grandson, my son was 5 when he needed to be circumcised. Not a nice thing for a young kid to go through, but necessary.

I agree, it makes it worthwhile having it done as a baby, they are less aware of the pain that he did need to go through.

Oh well, all good now though :)

meteor

8th December 2009, 21:17

Ribbed for her pleasure. That's all I have to say about that.

OK Trudes... Come clean (no pun intended) What does a girl prefer?....

I had no choice, a done deal back then, but I have 2 boys, and now it's not the done thing. Yes, there has been hygiene issues, but with modern medicine and education it's not a problem. Times change and we evolve.

XxKiTtiExX

8th December 2009, 21:18

2. The whole "choice" thing is a fallacious argument. Nobody in their right mind is going to let anybody draw blood on their dick, general anaethesia or otherwise. If it's not done to newborns, it's not going to happen.

3. Again there is an assumption that the "medical reason" is something that will afflict the foreskin's wearer. Circumcision can reduce the risks of urinary tract infections. More importantly it can reduce the risk of transmitting some STDs.

In reply to #2 scroll back through the thread where someones partner had it done. I also know of grown men who have gone and had it done. Just because it isn't done as a newborn doesn't then mean to say that you would NEVER get it done if its what you "wanted."

In regards to #3, vitamin C intake can help reduce the risk of urinary tract infections (cranberries). So can urinating frequently (eg: going before you end up busting). And lets not forget "personal hygiene."

In regards to reducing the risk of transmitting some STD's..

Condom.

Sidewinder

8th December 2009, 21:19

its a jew thing. thats why jewish men have there thing cut out because all jewish woman like anything 20% off!:shit::shit::shit:

Hitcher

8th December 2009, 21:21

I think it's time to leave this discussion to the aromatherapists.

Sidewinder

8th December 2009, 21:22

I think it's time to leave this discussion to the aromatherapists.

in english please

Conquiztador

8th December 2009, 21:28

Not done, nor are my 4 boys. Never had a problem nor have they.

In my opinion it is like saying: "You will have bad teeth when older as you will not brush them, so lets pull them out straight away..."

AND something nobody has mentioned: There is a bunch of nerves attached to the foreskin that increase the pleasure for a man. And w/o the foreskin protecting the head the nerves and the skin nerves there will get less sensitive too.

And from the feedback I have had there is nothing ugly about my fella. ;)

FlangMasterJ

8th December 2009, 21:59

And from the feedback I have had there is nothing ugly about my fella. ;)

Haha just the prick attached to it!

No seriously doing that to an eight year old is just cruel and barbaric.

Did they tell him what they were going to do before they butchered him?

bikemike

8th December 2009, 22:26

If it wasn't meant to be there you wouldn't be born with it. 1. Nonsense. Please explain your appendix.

Surely neither meant nor not meant, just there.
And if we keep being born with them, and they keep cutting them off, and more again are born with them, then perhaps a more robust case should be made, but can't! It's not like we are keeping men with foreskins alive in spite of their condition.

I see only one reason to sever and several reasons not to. This is more tied up in people's belief or lack of choice than they are prepared to admit.

I once had a Jewish friend, pleasant enough, moody and of the aromatherapist kind. She always had this euphemism about being clean. I was single at the time, and I had no idea when she'd relate how she told someone she knew that I was 'clean'. Of course I was clean, I had told her. Why on earth would I have had any idea what she was on about other than general good old fashioned cleanliness.... took me another few years before I twigged what she was implying!

Berries

8th December 2009, 22:43

Can't believe I joined a motorbike forum and commented on this but I feel for the kid in the OP. I was done when I was 13, for medical reasons in that I couldn't piss without being in extreme pain. Not sure of the reasons, I know I had been kicked in the nads earlier that night but was too young to understand and you blank it out. I do recall the doctor saying put him in a bath and jabbing a knitting needle in before being admitted. At hospital late at night I recall screaming so loud while my old man held me (shoulders like, not down there) it woke other people up. The pain was something else. Apart from a very slow amputation while pouring vinegar on the wound I can't imagine anything as being that painful.

I won't tell you about pulling the stitches out, the fact that at that age you are starting to get hard ons and all that. All I will say is it is a barbaric practice. Any religion that says it's required is fucked in the head. You should go through life with what you are born with unless it malfunctions and has to be fixed.

I've got an 11 month old boy. There is no way in the fucking world I would consider even for one second doing it to him. Madness. Absolute madness.

Having said all that, chicks do dig scars.

popa griffin

8th December 2009, 23:14

I had trouble pissing too.

I think i was like 4 or 5 when I had it done. But from what I can remember there was no pain, apart from when i went to sleep and the stiches caught on the bed sheets and shit like that.

Now i think about it. I dont care. It looks alright, works all the same. So its all good.

cruza

8th December 2009, 23:21

Trudes

9th December 2009, 05:43

so maybe KB needs "you show me yours and ill show you mine"thread:innocent:
Have you not been to a KB rally?

ask around and you may hear alot about mine:wari::wari:
Could you narrow it down a bit, which guys should I be asking?

OK Trudes... Come clean (no pun intended) What does a girl prefer?....

Like most things, personal preference and depends on how it's used bla blah blah..... BUT personally I found Un-cut better. When they're hard they all look the same (apart from the scar tissue) and Un-cut guys are more sensitive (I don't mean they cry more often)

Oakie

9th December 2009, 07:05

LOL. I just noticed that when I entered the forum that the 'Are you circumcised?' thread was right above the 'Meat-Free Monday' thread.

DMNTD

9th December 2009, 07:11

ask around and you may hear alot about mine:wari::wari:

Don't stress man...those warts just need treating :niceone:

Jenny

9th December 2009, 09:17

I have a son and a daughter..would never consider cutting off any body parts, they were born perfect,, why would you want to change that :)

Forest

9th December 2009, 13:29

I consider circumcision to be male genital mutiliation.

I don't care if adults do it to themselves, but it seems grossly unfair to permanently desensitise the penis of an infant or child (who cannot consent).

Forest

9th December 2009, 13:35

We wanted our son done - but he was jaundiced when born and they wouldn't do it. However, like your grandson, my son was 5 when he needed to be circumcised. Not a nice thing for a young kid to go through, but necessary.

I agree, it makes it worthwhile having it done as a baby, they are less aware of the pain that he did need to go through.

Oh well, all good now though :)

Why would you think that babies are less aware of pain?

This is a serious question.

Stirts

9th December 2009, 13:45

Why would you think that babies are less aware of pain?

This is a serious question.

As babies already enter the world screaming their little lungs out, I guess the old saying would apply…. they are already crying so let's give them something to cry about?

I personally think it is a very mean thing to do, just like when they used to smack babies to get them to take their first breath back in the day....although I did see a little quote ...... the reason they smacked the babies was to make the diddles fall off all the smart ones :dodge:

BoristheBiter

9th December 2009, 13:50

i can't really belive this is on KB.

But,
If it needs to be done it does, end of story.

If you are going to have a go at it and call it barbaric because of religious beliefs then talk to someone from the other side.

There was an English tv show when girls went to live in an African village and the girls felt sorry for her and pitied her because she had not had it done.

Now i do not condone this in any way as it is not the beliefs that I have been brought up on but if you are going to pass jugment on anyones culture think about all the people who belive in any religon.

Tank

9th December 2009, 13:56

i can't really belive this is on KB.

You must be new here - this is nothing.

anyway ...

Its a good thing for a number of reasons:

1 - It's cleaner (although Im sure most young kids dont mind giving it a spit and polish)

2 - It looks better

3 - Whenever someone calls you a complete cock - you can actually prove you arnt.

Reasons against:

None that I can think of as long as its done really young.

StoneY

9th December 2009, 13:59

If you are going to have a go at it and call it barbaric because of religious beliefs then talk to someone from the other side.

Now i do not condone this in any way as it is not the beliefs that I have been brought up on but if you are going to pass jugment on anyones culture think about all the people who belive in any religon.

Bullshit, your condoning it because these stupid fuckers have an unjustified belief in some godamn all knowing entity that tells them they need to be mutilated to prove they believe

Religeon, the worst invention superstitious, scared and lonley cave dwellers could ever come up with on a lonely cold night hiding from sabertooth whatevers which roamed thier backyard

Parents that mutilate thier child, male or female, infant or teenaged rite of passage, its still fucking WRONG

The penis has a foreskin to protect the nerves that support the ongoing reproduction of our species
The only need to cut it is if the phallic muscles grow faster than the epidermus, and even then no ned to fully circumsize

IT FUCKING BARBARIC end of story, and in the 21st century why the fuck do idiots still cling to religeous reasons as 'justification' to mutilate another human beings body without consent?

ARROGANCE is what, like many 'believers' its MY belief that matters, your RIGHTS and HUMAN DIGNITY can fuck off coz I BELIEVE

Just like drowning anyone who COULD swim as a whitch...ignorant supertstitions

Rant over (for now)

BoristheBiter

9th December 2009, 14:02

You must be new here - this is nothing.

anyway ...

Its a good thing for a number of reasons:

1 - It's cleaner (although Im sure most young kids dont mind giving it a spit and polish)

2 - It looks better

3 - Whenever someone calls you a complete cock - you can actually prove you arnt.

Reasons against:

None that I can think of as long as its done really young.

was not for it or against it, i was just pointing out what one needs to think about when making very opinionated comments.

I wouldn't know what it is like to be a snuffle so i couldn't say it was better or worse.

Foxzee

9th December 2009, 14:03

Bullshit, your condoning it because these stupid fuckers have an unjustified belief in some godamn all knowing entity that tells them they need to be mutilated to prove they believe

Religeon, the worst invention superstitious, scared and lonley cave dwellers could ever come up with on a lonely cold night hiding from sabertooth whatevers which roamed thier backyard

Parents that mutilate thier child, male or female, infant or teenaged rite of passage, its still fucking WRONG

The penis has a foreskin to protect the nerves that support the ongoing reproduction of our species
The only need to cut it is if the phallic muscles grow faster than the epidermus, and even then no ned to fully circumsize

IT FUCKING BARBARIC end of story, and in the 21st century why the fuck do idiots still cling to religeous reasons as 'justification' to mutilate another human beings body without consent?

ARROGANCE is what, like many 'believers' its MY belief that matters, your RIGHTS and HUMAN DIGNITY can fuck off coz I BELIEVE

Just like drowning anyone who COULD swim as a whitch...ignorant supertstitions

Rant over (for now)

WOW.....where did that come from Hun...........:clap::clap: LOL

BoristheBiter

9th December 2009, 14:05

Tank

9th December 2009, 14:06

i was just pointing out what one needs to think about when making very opinionated comments.

Again - you must be new to KB. Opinionated comments make up 95% of all post here.

StoneY

9th December 2009, 14:17

do you belive in anything?

Yes, I do. I have beliefs. Everyone has

But my belifes lie not in 'organised relligeon' thats for sure

The most despicable actions are carried out in the name of God (whichever one you believe in, example; the Spanish Inquisition or the execution of Joan of Ark who was hearing 'gods voice' as long as she kept beating the poms for the Frog nobility) all to justify forcing another persons personal belief system on others, often by force of arms at that (the Taliban for example)

In this day and age where DNA and Atoms are no longer mysteries, peoples blind faith in the 'good book' (again whatever book you wish to cling to) is pathetic, illogical, and unexplainable

BoristheBiter

9th December 2009, 14:31

Yes, I do. I have beliefs. Everyone has

But my belifes lie not in 'organised relligeon' thats for sure

The most despicable actions are carried out in the name of God (whichever one you believe in, example; the Spanish Inquisition or the execution of Joan of Ark who was hearing 'gods voice' as long as she kept beating the poms for the Frog nobility) all to justify forcing another persons personal belief system on others, often by force of arms at that (the Taliban for example)

In this day and age where DNA and Atoms are no longer mysteries, peoples blind faith in the 'good book' (again whatever book you wish to cling to) is pathetic, illogical, and unexplainable

weather it is oranised or not they are still belifes, and if somone started having a go at you becuase of it you would get a bit upset.

you seem to belive that i condone this practice but i don't, never have, never will. but when you can't piss it changes ones mind.

Naki Rat

9th December 2009, 14:35

StoneY

9th December 2009, 14:52

weather it is oranised or not they are still belifes, and if somone started having a go at you becuase of it you would get a bit upset.

you seem to belive that i condone this practice but i don't, never have, never will. but when you can't piss it changes ones mind.

Now you contradict your own previous statement, as below

If you are going to have a go at it and call it barbaric because of religious beliefs then talk to someone from the other side.

As for talking to the 'other side' I was raised in a family that attended Church regular, and by age 12 I could see through the bullshit and was the first in the family to stop going...Mum n Dad fully supported my choices too

I have plenty of mates that 'believe' and are also gifted with the ability to accept others for not being of the same belief's, and we talk over these issues a lot! Ones even a Church pastor, and another is on these forums, no one would ever guess who he is (and I aint saying)

Thats freedomof choice, and I dont judge people for believing in god.
I judge them for using thier beliefs to force thier worldly opinions upon others, or to disfigure kids in the name of some god when there is no reason or justification for it

MOST modern 'post infant circumcisions' are purely because no one taught the kid to keep his dick clean and wipe the cheese off...thats fuckin sad

And as for MY beliefs, I believe every bloke should have enjoyed having a wank with his full and natural foreskin intact...its a great feeling and no lube required!

:devil2:

BoristheBiter

9th December 2009, 15:27

Now you contradict your own previous statement, as below

As for talking to the 'other side' I was raised in a family that attended Church regular, and by age 12 I could see through the bullshit and was the first in the family to stop going...Mum n Dad fully supported my choices too

I have plenty of mates that 'believe' and are also gifted with the ability to accept others for not being of the same belief's, and we talk over these issues a lot! Ones even a Church pastor, and another is on these forums, no one would ever guess who he is (and I aint saying)

Thats freedomof choice, and I dont judge people for believing in god.
I judge them for using thier beliefs to force thier worldly opinions upon others, or to disfigure kids in the name of some god when there is no reason or justification for it

MOST modern 'post infant circumcisions' are purely because no one taught the kid to keep his dick clean and wipe the cheese off...thats fuckin sad

And as for MY beliefs, I believe every bloke should have enjoyed having a wank with his full and natural foreskin intact...its a great feeling and no lube required!

:devil2:

can't see where i have done. never said i was part of any religon or culture.

but if you look at your previous statement

"Religeon, the worst invention superstitious, scared and lonley cave dwellers could ever come up with on a lonely cold night hiding from sabertooth whatevers which roamed thier backyard"

now you say you have mates who think this, can't think much of them then.
pity you can't be that accepting of other peoples belifes.

and why get so angry if somone has a different opinion to you. the first reply you posted to me was just full of it.
we can all get angry and personal.

so you have a dick and know how to wank woop de fucking do. pity you have to do it yourself.

but that just shows how small minded we all are.

rachprice

9th December 2009, 15:31

Comparing female circumcision to male circumcision is plain retarded, they are completely different, done for entirely different reasons.

While male circumcision isn't exactly nice, (done correctly) it doesn't damage the function of the genitals.
Female circumcision is mutilation!

Pussy

9th December 2009, 15:52

While male circumcision isn't exactly nice, (done correctly)

I have no recollection of the procedure. It may have hurt, but I don't remember it

McDuck

9th December 2009, 15:58

Well i aint, dad was and if it is up to me my kid(s) will too, there is the thing that it is easer to keep clean, less likely to transmit (and pick up) STDs while i hope my kids will not be doing that i want to give them the best chance possible...

slofox

9th December 2009, 15:59

"Are you circumcised?"

If you want to know the answer to that Mrs BP, you'll have to look for yourself...:whistle: couldn't resist that...

Ronin

9th December 2009, 17:01

riffer

9th December 2009, 17:28

The jury is out about damaging the function for males. You are however very very correct on the female issue

Mine still seems to work perfectly fine...:niceone:

Pussy

9th December 2009, 17:31

I find my writing is neater when I'm having a slash on the side of the road, writing my name on the bank with pee, too!.... :)

Owl

9th December 2009, 17:41

I find my writing is neater when I'm having a slash on the side of the road, writing my name on the bank with pee, too!.... :)

Most important in snow!:yes: There are no second chances in snow:confused:

Maha

9th December 2009, 17:43

I find my writing is neater when I'm having a slash on the side of the road, writing my name on the bank with pee, too!.... :)

Your name?... meh! I had such a tank full once I managed to write my email address, the dots were fun...:niceone:

Pussy

9th December 2009, 17:47

Most important in snow!:yes: There are not second chances in snow:confused:

Haven't had the pleasure! The contrast between white and yellow snow must look AWESOME! :)

Owl

9th December 2009, 17:51

Haven't had the pleasure! The contrast between white and yellow snow must look AWESOME! :)

It is awesome, but you must always remember, don't eat the yellow snow.:eek5:

marty

9th December 2009, 17:53

not circumsized, but skin doesn't cover right over the end.

I, and a few others, think it looks OK :)

Foxzee

9th December 2009, 17:59

not circumsized, but skin doesn't cover right over the end.

I, and a few others, think it looks OK :)

We'll take your word on that........:rolleyes:

Qkchk

9th December 2009, 18:06

It all comes down to personal preference.... everyone has different tastes - just look at the variety of bikes we all ride on here!

I personally like them chopped.

I'm damn sure it is cleaner - anyone fancy the smell of cheesy scum during a BJ?

Pussy

9th December 2009, 18:14

but you must always remember, don't eat the yellow snow.:eek5:

This I know!!

Number One

9th December 2009, 19:42

Ok. Enough of the gibba gabba, SHOW US YOUR COCK!!!! ;)
mwahahahahaaa

WHAT SHE SAID!!! OH AND PICS OR YOU DON'T HAVE ONE ;)

Pussy

9th December 2009, 19:45

mwahahahahaaa

WHAT SHE SAID!!! OH AND PICS OR YOU DON'T HAVE ONE ;)

Show us your growler first!......

Sidewinder

9th December 2009, 19:47

i like the extra skin! i need it for when i get a hard on so theres extra skin for when the beast grows

Trudes

9th December 2009, 19:47

Show us your growler first!......

http://www.eco-afrika-tours.co.za/images/lionteeth.jpg

Mrs Busa Pete

9th December 2009, 19:49

Dam given out to much rep. Like those teeth.

Number One

9th December 2009, 19:49

Show us your growler first!......

You ARKSED for it!

Number ones growler shot (http://www.usnavy.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/final-testing-is-under-way-on-the-navys-new-growler-aircraft.gif) :blip:

Pussy

9th December 2009, 19:56

mwahahahahaaa

WHAT SHE SAID!!! OH AND PICS OR YOU DON'T HAVE ONE ;)

Here's my BIG cock!

Winston001

9th December 2009, 20:20

Male circumcision has occurred for about 15,000 years and developed independently is widely scattered cultures. There were various reasons such as a fertility rites, marking of slaves, and prevention of disease.

In the modern world however, there is little reason to circumcise. The medical benefits are as follows:

• Decrease in physical problems involving a tight foreskin

• Lower incidence of inflammation of the head of the penis

• Reduced urinary tract infections.

• Fewer problems with erections, especially at puberty.

• Decrease in certain sexually transmitted infections (STIs) such as HIV, HPV, chlamydia, syphilis in men and their partner(s).

• Almost complete elimination of invasive penile cancer.

• Decrease in urological problems generally.

The other side of the argument is why remove a piece of skin from a delicate organ......just in case? Some - indeed most of the above medical reasons are treatable today. To deliberately mutilate a child outside immediate physiological reasons (too tight) seems barbaric.

The prepuce (foreskin) contains sensitive nerves which add to sexual arousal.

Even more importantly, the foreskin acts as a protective sheath for the glans (penis head) which any male can confirm contains more sensitive nerve endings than any other part of the male body. The glans is exquisitely sensitive.

A circumcised penis rubs against underwear and over time loses its sensitivity. So being circumcised leads to lesser sexual arousal and enjoyment.

As a medical procedure it has its place but culturally the other reasons have disappeared into the mists of time.

Number One

9th December 2009, 20:33

A circumcised penis rubs against underwear and over time loses its sensitivity. So being circumcised leads to lesser sexual arousal and enjoyment.

Perhaps those suffering from premature ejaculation issues should consider it a possible cure and an alternative to taking the blue pill. Maybe then if circumcision was adopted as common practise across the board we wouldn't have to listen to all those painful fucking radio ads about it...seriously they are worse than the tampon and thrush ads...and I don't even have a cock, nor do I know any premature or non performing ones ;)

Still - despite the hypnotic lure of a world without premature ejaculation radio ads...I still wouldn't have done it to my boy nor would I do it to any future ones.