PDA

View Full Version : For BRONZ. How many bikes have DRLs



Ixion
10th September 2008, 13:18
DRLs, Daytime Running Lights are auxiliary lights that , by definition, have a low loight output, and must automatically come on when the ignition is switched on AND automatically go out when the headlamps are turned on.

The LTSA (or whatever they call themselves now) claim that "almost all motorcycles imported in recent years are fitted with DLRs"

That seems nonsense to me. Off hand I can't think of ANY bikes fitted with DLRs . However, I can't be sure about things like Harleys.

On the face of it, since many bikes have always on headlamps, DLRs would be a nonsense , since they could never be on.

Note the critical distinction, a light is ONLY a DLR if it goes off when the headlamp comes on. We are not talking about things like the SV1000 whichhas a couple of little lights (always on) as well as the headlamps.

Does anyone know of any bikes fitted with DLRs as standard ?

Squiggles
10th September 2008, 13:21
Nope, cant think of any, perhaps they've gotten confused between DRL's and having your lights hardwired on?

Hitcher
10th September 2008, 13:26
Can't think of any, using the definition provided above.

Some bikes built for the US market have an arrangement where the front indicators are constantly illuminated. But that doesn't conform with the definition for DRLs.

ManDownUnder
10th September 2008, 13:28
Ditto - can't think of any.

Suspect a strong case of (mis)interpretation on one or other sides.... my bike (and a hell of a lot of others) have headlights on full time.

I expect that's what they tried to say?

KiwiRat
10th September 2008, 13:34
Suspect a strong case of (mis)interpretation on one or other sides....

LTSA get it wrong?

You will be suitably punished at the appropriate time..:devil2:

Daffyd
10th September 2008, 13:36
No, they're not confused, they're just trying to stuff people around. They've done it for years, eg:
It's illegal to drive a car using parking lights, (despite the fact that Volvo have them wired to the ignition.)
It's illegal to have a single fog or driving light on a car, (despite the fact that the Studebaker Champion and Commander, Rover 90-110 and the Austin A90 Atlantic all had them as standard equipment.)
These rules were in force some years ago, (obiously,) but I think they are still current.

Ixion
10th September 2008, 13:50
What they said.

From teh gubbernmint Regulatory Impact Assessment for new rules regulations and fines proposed . here (http://www.transport.govt.nz/assets/NewPDFs/Motorcycle-Safety-RIS.pdf)



Daytime running lights are fitted to the front of a motorcycle to make it easier to be seen by other road users.They have a low light output and are not bright enough to illuminate the road ahead. These are normally designed so that they turn on automatically with the engine ignition, and turn off when the dipped or main beam headlamps are switched on. The vast majority of new motorcycle and moped imports entering New Zealand have these lights as standard.

Swoop
10th September 2008, 16:57
I call bullshit on this one.
Hardwired headlamps seem to be around on certain bikes, but "extra lights" seems very unusual.

Qkchk
10th September 2008, 17:19
The LTSA (or whatever they call themselves now)


LTSA get it wrong?



The LTSA / LTNZ name has changed to NZTA at the start of August. Its a combination of Land Transport NZ and Transit.

www.nzta.govt.nz

Got to laugh that the LTNZ (opps, I mean the NZTA) website still comes up with the old LTSA address.

James Deuce
10th September 2008, 17:20
None. Zip. Nada.

Actually, Ducati 999, SV1000 (like you said they are little but fit the DRL description), '04, '05 R6 and R1. All I can think of off the top of my dome.

Let me qualify that further still. These bikes have lights that would qualify IF they were wired to work that way. The Headlight on thing kind of ruins that.

scumdog
10th September 2008, 17:28
What they said.

From teh gubbernmint Regulatory Impact Assessment for new rules regulations and fines proposed . here (http://www.transport.govt.nz/assets/NewPDFs/Motorcycle-Safety-RIS.pdf)

Sooooo...who is the 'expert' that will point to the various types of lights and say 'not a DRL'.... 'THAT'S a DRL'...'That's NOT a DRL' etc.

Who DOES decide what isn't, what is??

BTW: CB and I have the brightest little 'melt-yer-retinas' DRLs on our H-Ds, worth their weight in gold I reckon.

Big Dave
10th September 2008, 17:38
Some of the Kawasaki and Yamaha Middleweight Cruisers have them. The indicators are running lights.

Harleys don't.

Motu
10th September 2008, 17:45
I don't think I've even seen DRL's on a car - and I do a dozen WoF's a day.They have been trying to get away from the driving light/fog light confusion...and there are no park lights anymore,they are marker lights....etc.Confusion with headlights hard wired to the key here I think....are BRONZ going to have a little word in their ear?

Gremlin
11th September 2008, 02:38
What about the park bulbs that sometimes accompany the normal bulbs?

The 04 zx10 has these small bulbs, they are on when normal lights are on...