Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 88

Thread: What to look for when buying a dual-purpose bike?

  1. #61
    Join Date
    27th September 2008 - 18:14
    Bike
    SWM RS 650R
    Location
    Richmond
    Posts
    3,816
    That KTM is tempting. Anyone interested in a 05 klr only ridden on Sundays?
    I mentioned vegetables once, but I think I got away with it...........

  2. #62
    Join Date
    14th October 2003 - 11:53
    Bike
    BMW R100GS
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    4,576
    Quote Originally Posted by Woodman View Post
    That KTM is tempting. Anyone interested in a 05 klr only ridden on Sundays?
    Now thats really stretching the one careful lady owner bit.
    www.AdventureRidingNZ.co.nz NZ's dedicated Adventure Riding Community
    Forums, free GPS track downloads and much more. Now over 5700 members, are you one of them?

  3. #63
    Join Date
    31st August 2008 - 20:27
    Bike
    '91 R100GS Supertanker
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    1,164
    Quote Originally Posted by Woodman View Post
    That KTM is tempting. Anyone interested in a 05 klr only ridden on Sundays?
    The KTM would like fit with your riding style as well, though you should give thought to the less is more philosophy vis a vis bodywork. I can see that you are already going down that track with the KLR...

    Or maybe a KTM 640E like ClintNZ?

    We'll get you on the orange team yet

    Steve
    IT'S JUST BETTER WHEN THERE'S TWINS INVOLVED..
    My GS build thread is here
    My ride photos are here

  4. #64
    Join Date
    27th September 2008 - 18:14
    Bike
    SWM RS 650R
    Location
    Richmond
    Posts
    3,816
    Quote Originally Posted by BMWRSNUT View Post
    The KTM would like fit with your riding style as well, though you should give thought to the less is more philosophy vis a vis bodywork. I can see that you are already going down that track with the KLR...

    Or maybe a KTM 640E like ClintNZ?

    We'll get you on the orange team yet

    Steve
    actually i have become quite attached to my KLR, kinda like my favourite pair of sneakers. Mocked up a crash bar setup today in the shed that should work well if I ever drop it hard again.
    I mentioned vegetables once, but I think I got away with it...........

  5. #65
    Join Date
    15th August 2004 - 17:52
    Bike
    KTM 2T & LC4
    Location
    Rather be riding
    Posts
    3,326
    Quote Originally Posted by BMWRSNUT View Post
    Warewolf has experimented with dropping the bike, & dog legs etc, though I understand it's back on more standard setting now.
    Yep, all back to std except more preload at front and less at the back - as good as I can get for my weight. Lowering links are satan's spawn... avoid at all costs.

    Can't say I've noticed the extra height, but sure as possums are a pest I have noticed the improved suspension response & ground clearance. Haven't bottomed either end since, and I've hit stuff a lot harder... 'cos I can. Actually that's not quite true; I haven't bottomed the rear, but I have and regularly do bottom the front - but with no ill effects. Bash plate still decks out sometimes, but that's due to the rider being lousy at lofting the front. Even at the Laid Back trail ride in the ruts made by MX bikes, it didn't get hung up on the foot pegs like it used to.

    The shock in the adventure is the same as used on all the LC4 variants, pretty much. There are internal spacers to set the travel depending on the application, eg the Duke & motard bikes have a lot less. You're better off spending your money on a shock service including lowering, especially if buying used, and maybe a revalve while they're in there.

    For more technical discussion on why lowering links are bad, read:
    Lowering the bike (post #21 to the end). It's less problematic to reduce the preload at both ends, but that's not ideal, either.

    The issue with all this is that you want the suspension to work well, when you are riding the bike. Lowering it is trying to make the suspension work well, when you are NOT riding it - or at least transitioning between stopped and riding - and any such mods short of a stroke reduction and revalve will compromise the riding action.
    Cheers,
    Colin

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve McQueen
    All racers I know aren't in it for the money. They race because it's something inside of them... They're not courting death. They're courting being alive.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    13th May 2006 - 12:21
    Bike
    2002 KTM 640 Adventure
    Location
    S37.53984 E175.71482
    Posts
    3,106

    Not quite correct....

    Quote Originally Posted by BMWRSNUT View Post
    Nah, NZKTM is shorter than me. He's got the bike set up much lower than mine. Bart'd do well on it.
    The measurement to the lowest part of the saddle is 955mm, which is what the manual says, give or take...
    It looks low, I grant you that. It must be my fat arse on the bike that makes it look lower...


    It isn't a tall machine at all. I have a 30 inch inside leg and can sit nicely with toes on the ground, it is tall when you try to put the sidestand down and it keeps going down and down...into soft ground...
    Getting the leg down then and trying to get the bike upright, noe there is a good scenario, that no man's land between shall I let it go or do I wait here and look like a ballerina until someone comes and tips me back upright....

  7. #67
    Join Date
    13th May 2006 - 12:21
    Bike
    2002 KTM 640 Adventure
    Location
    S37.53984 E175.71482
    Posts
    3,106

    Thanks Eddie..

    Quote Originally Posted by Eddieb View Post
    That 640 adventure is a pretty cool machine.
    It is a very cool machine and it gets me most places comfortably as you can attest to. Some places that it shouldn't have been as well
    It also bounces well and has been proven in the Dakar. After seeing the bike ridden as a trail bike it amazes me that anything that can weigh over 170Kg fully fuelled behaves like that!
    Remember that there is over 28Kg there extra ballast when fuelled up. The bike weighs about 154Kg empty...

    Not a light flickable machine but when empty of fuel behaves well on the metal roads. Full of gas it is a sedate ride until you get it down to the less than half full scenario...

  8. #68
    Join Date
    6th November 2008 - 16:16
    Bike
    XL650V Silver Streak!
    Location
    Bikini Bottom
    Posts
    1,862
    Quote Originally Posted by BMWRSNUT View Post
    The KTM would like fit with your riding style as well, though you should give thought to the less is more philosophy vis a vis bodywork. I can see that you are already going down that track with the KLR...

    Or maybe a KTM 640E like ClintNZ?

    We'll get you on the orange team yet

    Steve

    Have to agree with you Steve. After having seen Nigel ride the snot out of the KLR, I reckon a KTM would suit him down to the ground!

    Cheers, Dave

  9. #69
    Join Date
    31st August 2008 - 20:27
    Bike
    '91 R100GS Supertanker
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    1,164

    Ktm640a

    The other aspect re the tallness of the bike, is that I run the centrestand. That makes the bike sit with suspension fully extended. If I ran the sidestand it would be much more manageable getting on & off the bike, but less of a good thing for maintenance or flats.

    NZKTM runs the sidestand.

    Steve
    IT'S JUST BETTER WHEN THERE'S TWINS INVOLVED..
    My GS build thread is here
    My ride photos are here

  10. #70
    Join Date
    13th May 2006 - 12:21
    Bike
    2002 KTM 640 Adventure
    Location
    S37.53984 E175.71482
    Posts
    3,106

    Yes, that is right...

    Quote Originally Posted by BMWRSNUT View Post
    The other aspect re the tallness of the bike, is that I run the centrestand. That makes the bike sit with suspension fully extended. If I ran the sidestand it would be much more manageable getting on & off the bike, but less of a good thing for maintenance or flats.

    NZKTM runs the sidestand.

    Steve
    I have both and can run with both. I bought a stand from KTM in Germany so it can have both sidestand and centrestand. At present it runs with sidestand.
    Maintenance? Nothing needs doing ever...

    I have a big stand for the bike when putting on and taking off wheels etc...

    The bike comes standard from the factory with centrestand. The sidestand was developed to be used as well, as they share the same bolts and attachments to the frame. So, I think I have tywo sidestands, one centrestand, the newer one is the developed on from KTM in Europe that has been adapted for the use of both. I chose to take it off.

  11. #71
    Join Date
    27th September 2008 - 18:14
    Bike
    SWM RS 650R
    Location
    Richmond
    Posts
    3,816
    Quote Originally Posted by Paladin View Post
    Have to agree with you Steve. After having seen Nigel ride the snot out of the KLR, I reckon a KTM would suit him down to the ground!

    My KLR got me down to the ground twice on the NIIS last weekend.
    I mentioned vegetables once, but I think I got away with it...........

  12. #72
    Join Date
    13th May 2006 - 12:21
    Bike
    2002 KTM 640 Adventure
    Location
    S37.53984 E175.71482
    Posts
    3,106

    Then the KTM

    Quote Originally Posted by Woodman View Post
    My KLR got me down to the ground twice on the NIIS last weekend.
    will be the Bees Knees for you, it suits me down to the ground too!

    It is a little heavy in piucking it up again but definitely worth it, and you know what? The bits that had fallen off just bolt back on and away it goes again and again..
    I will certainly give it a 10 out of 10 for build quality...

  13. #73
    Join Date
    2nd March 2004 - 13:00
    Bike
    FransAlp 700
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    14,484
    Quote Originally Posted by NZKTM View Post
    It is a little heavy in piucking it up again but definitely worth it, and you know what? The bits that had fallen off just bolt back on and away it goes again and again..
    I will certainly give it a 10 out of 10 for build quality...
    But the KLR gets 10/10 for re-build quality.




    Or is that quantity?

  14. #74
    Join Date
    13th May 2006 - 12:21
    Bike
    2002 KTM 640 Adventure
    Location
    S37.53984 E175.71482
    Posts
    3,106

    yes, hard to top that...

    Quote Originally Posted by NordieBoy View Post
    But the KLR gets 10/10 for re-build quality.




    Or is that quantity?
    Cannot even reply to that other than yes, agreed....

  15. #75
    Join Date
    15th August 2004 - 17:52
    Bike
    KTM 2T & LC4
    Location
    Rather be riding
    Posts
    3,326
    Quote Originally Posted by NordieBoy View Post
    But the KLR gets 10/10 for re-build quality.




    Or is that quantity?




    Cheers,
    Colin

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve McQueen
    All racers I know aren't in it for the money. They race because it's something inside of them... They're not courting death. They're courting being alive.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •