Exactly what i was thinking.
There was a famous quote by someone when 4-wheel drive came into rallying who said....
"with 2-wheel drive with 300hp we were spinning spinning spinning... with 4-wheel drive we were 500hp before we were spinning spinning spinning"
(or something like that)
awesome but is it practical???
squid question - would it in theory be able to do two burnouts at the same time ?
How do you stop it from going forward dude? With your feet? I don't think you'll have much luck there. Unless you say soak both tyres in oil, then you might get somewhere. Or not.
Now that would be trick.
I have vague recollections of the WR450 and the disadvantages of the 2 wheel drive system. Things like complexity, weight, performance degradation due to heat, suspension action causing variable drive.
It's less complex, lighter and requires less maintenance than a mechanical system, but the difference to a standard bike was quite noticeable apparently.
Zen wisdom: No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously. - obviously had KB in mind when he came up with that gem
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
"We have, through hooses, connected the pump to the mutter"
"It would be spiteful, to put jellyfish in a trifle."\m/ o.o \m/
providing the front wheel provides enough instantaneous torque to overcome the force of kinetic friction of the front wheel, then yes, one could do a rolling burnout, the rear out to be easy enough.
alternatively you could induce slide by braking to get passed the static force of friction, then rolling on the throttle.
oab could do it![]()
Cool.
Its a Vello Solex R1
Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks