
Originally Posted by
YellowDog
The problem I see is recognising what is enjoying yourself, but still taking reasonable care; compared with someone elses opinion of what you are doing.
That sums it up well.
I am all for doing as I choose, but not at risk of consequence to you or anyone else, and of course the reverse applies. Bar the "shit happens" or "whoever would have thought of that" stuff - no one is insulated from that.
But what about someone taking umbrage at my passing manoevre? Passing a two tonne car on a 200KG bike poses little or no risk to them. Sure I might give them a fright, but that does not mean they were actually at risk.
Same applies on KB - countless opinions here contrast with those of others, but no actual harm comes of it, until some persons secondary emotions turn into actions, and then things are said or done that are not reversable. Some things that are said are irrelevant - they do not actually harm me, per se. Move on.
It comes down to freedom. You are free to conduct yourself in any manner you choose.
And so am I.
But what if my unrestricted actions impact your freedom? Does one person have freedom at the expense of the next person?
The bottom line is, I am not free to act in any manner I choose, and neither are you, because if we were, then we would be able to act without consequence - which we cannot.
True freedom comes from me not impacting your rights, and vice versa.
So lets make a deal. 
Steve
"I am a licenced motorcycle instructor, I agree with dangerousbastard, no point in repeating what he said."
"read what Steve says. He's right."
"What Steve said pretty much summed it up."
"I did axactly as you said and it worked...!!"
"Wow, Great advise there DB."
WTB: Hyosung bikes or going or not.
Bookmarks