
Originally Posted by
Forest
We shouldn't be paying for NZ Super. State funded super is the biggest crock of crap out there (it isn't even means-tested! WTF?) If the oldies weren't disproportionately represented in the voting stats, I am confident that universal super would have disappeared a long time ago.
State-super is a strange one. I may be corrected on this, but I think it goes something like...
Historically, 6 pence in the pound was taken off wage earners to fund their retirement. About the time of the Kirk Government I think, it was no longer collected separately, it was just incorporated into general taxation. By the time of the Muldoon Government, it was spent, just keeping government alive, but workers were promised that as they had paid for a pension, it would be there for them.
Indeed the lie was made, and retained by subsequent governments that the super fund was still alive, just buried in standard taxation. Steady as she goes kind of thing.
Ruth Richardson started to increase the age of entitlement, as she was aware that the current system had already taken the retirement savings of many workers, and squandered them, so the kitty was empty.
Subsequent governments realised that future pensions were a liability, so dodged the issue big-time.
Mr. Cullens kiwisaver completes the circle. Workers now save 6 pence in the pound for retirement just like it used to be.
I wonder how long until the Cullen fund, is spent somewhere else. Or how long till a private investement company goes broke, and government picks up the tab, effectively nationalising the scheme ?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Super is a limited benefit... it is set at 65% of the average wage.
That is, a couple get 65% of the average wage, a single gets slightly over 33%.
The thread shows very little problem with welfare, its just the size of the payment that causes trouble.
Possibly ALL benefits should be capped at 65%. ?
David must play fair with the other kids, even the idiots.
Bookmarks