Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 97

Thread: Heavy Vehicle Amendment - Act now

  1. #1
    Join Date
    28th April 2004 - 11:42
    Bike
    tedium
    Location
    earth
    Posts
    3,526

    Heavy Vehicle Amendment - Act now

    Gah. As if they haven't destroyed the roads enough already, plans are afoot to allow vehicles to operate with up to 55 tonnes laden weight as opposed to the current 44 tonne limit. Watch this space for when this goes to consultation and lets do something about this.


    Heavy Vehicle Amendment
    HortNZ staff met with the Ministry of Transport officials recently to discuss the amendment to allow heavier vehicles on our roads. This would allow for vehicles to operate up to 55 tonnes laden weight rather than the present 44 tonne limit. Trials have shown a potential 20 percent gain in fuel efficiency and emissions could be made, providing bridges are up to taking the weight.
    Bridges on all state highways are being checked for their tolerance of an increase.
    The rule amendment will be out for consultation in June and it is hoped the
    amendment will be passed by December 2009.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kickha
    Fuck off, cheese has no place in pies
    Quote Originally Posted by Akzle
    i would could and can, put a fat fuck down with a bit of brass.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    2nd March 2004 - 13:00
    Bike
    FransAlp 700
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    14,484
    They need to make some dedicated roads out of say... steel to handle the weight and then they could link up lots of trailers and pull really heavy loads.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    25th April 2009 - 17:38
    Bike
    RC36, RC31, KR-E, CR125
    Location
    Manawatu
    Posts
    7,364
    i wober if they have even factored in the road damage, all good to get 20% more fuel efficiency, but if it costs more than that to repair the roads then its fucking pointless.

    Then again we all know whatd hapen anyway, roads wont even be repaired till they're completely fucked.

    NordieBoys suggestions is far better that increasing weight limit
    "A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal

  4. #4
    Join Date
    25th January 2007 - 21:37
    Bike
    2011 ER-6N
    Location
    Glenfield
    Posts
    2,888
    Quote Originally Posted by NordieBoy View Post
    They need to make some dedicated roads out of say... steel to handle the weight and then they could link up lots of trailers and pull really heavy loads.
    Impossible! It's never been done before!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    23rd April 2004 - 19:16
    Bike
    2010 DC Skate Shoes
    Location
    Roxby Downs, SA
    Posts
    7,089
    How does making a truck 25% heavier give it a 20% fuel efficienyc gain?
    KiwiBitcher
    where opinion holds more weight than fact.

    It's better to not pass and know that you could have than to pass and find out that you can't. Wait for the straight.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    5th February 2008 - 13:07
    Bike
    2006 Hyosung GT650R
    Location
    BOP
    Posts
    7,141
    Yeah but they get charged a lot more money to use the roads. The real problem is the govt pulling money out of the roading fund and squandering it elsewhere.

    Steve
    "I am a licenced motorcycle instructor, I agree with dangerousbastard, no point in repeating what he said."
    "read what Steve says. He's right."
    "What Steve said pretty much summed it up."
    "I did axactly as you said and it worked...!!"
    "Wow, Great advise there DB."
    WTB: Hyosung bikes or going or not.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    3rd May 2005 - 11:51
    Bike
    XR200
    Location
    Invercargill - Arrowtn
    Posts
    1,395
    Quote Originally Posted by R6_kid View Post
    How does making a truck 25% heavier give it a 20% fuel efficiency gain?
    Because 5 trucks are currently needed to carry what 4 trucks can manage. Seems sensible to me.

    As for road damage, that depends upon the number of axles and tyres. The more there are, the less damage.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    19th September 2006 - 22:02
    Bike
    02 Ducati ST4s
    Location
    Here there everywhere
    Posts
    5,458
    Quote Originally Posted by Winston001 View Post
    Because 5 trucks are currently needed to carry what 4 trucks can manage. Seems sensible to me.

    As for road damage, that depends upon the number of axles and tyres. The more there are, the less damage.
    also depends on the road, and how much maintenance it gets I guess... main National highways should be okay... provincial highway should be ok as well... other roads debatable I have see trucks on the side roads that rip the road up... but being a side road it gets no maintenacne...

  9. #9
    Join Date
    4th January 2005 - 18:50
    Bike
    Massey ferguson 7495 dyna-vt
    Location
    Norfland
    Posts
    6,917
    Quote Originally Posted by R6_kid View Post
    How does making a truck 25% heavier give it a 20% fuel efficienyc gain?
    it equates to removing 1 in five trucks.

    and...I know everyone doesn't like the damage...but...I think your pointing your fingers at the wrong group to be honest...mordern trucks are pretty dam good on roads...shame about morden roads!!
    Quote Originally Posted by Drew View Post
    Given the short comings of my riding style, it doesn't matter what I'm riding till I've got my shit in one sock.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    7th March 2008 - 10:24
    Bike
    Out of control Firestorm
    Location
    Palmerston North
    Posts
    1,002
    Again we have a rail network that was built for this very purpose being ignored. I'm sure it costs less to maintain a rail network then roads.
    As a well-spent day brings happy sleep, so life well used brings happy death
    Γύρος στη νίκη

  11. #11
    Join Date
    21st May 2009 - 13:44
    Bike
    None
    Location
    Matamata, Waikato
    Posts
    206

    Thumbs up Bring back trains!!

    Bring back trains! Pro's and cons

    PRO"S -

    1. I locomotive can carry over 10 times as much as 1 truck (depending on the loco)
    2. Don't cause ANY damage to the roads, as long as maintenance is kept up at crossings.
    3. Don't hold up traffic, or require massive slow downs and passing lanes to be up every hill
    4. Are much more environmentally friendly due to their capacity
    5. Do I need to say more ...

    CONS -

    1. Um ......
    2. Loss of truck driving jobs ...
    3. Um ....
    People are more violently opposed to fur than leather because it's safer to harass rich women than motorcycle gangs. - Alexei Sayle

    Fame was like a drug, but what was even more like a drug were the drugs. - Homer Simpson

  12. #12
    Join Date
    16th September 2003 - 11:36
    Posts
    6,427
    there is a special bit of totora st @ the mount, which is legal for heavy trucks to use with move containers from a storage dept to the whafts.

    This bit of road is meant deisnged ot handle the heavy loads, but still gets a fair bit of mantaince on it,

    but in turn the trucks are also accelrating from a stand still which help damage it quicker.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    21st May 2009 - 13:44
    Bike
    None
    Location
    Matamata, Waikato
    Posts
    206

    Another pro

    Less truck related crashes on the roads .... probably cutting road accidents down by half!!
    People are more violently opposed to fur than leather because it's safer to harass rich women than motorcycle gangs. - Alexei Sayle

    Fame was like a drug, but what was even more like a drug were the drugs. - Homer Simpson

  14. #14
    Join Date
    3rd October 2004 - 17:35
    Posts
    6,390
    yeah we NEED trains. Trains are so much better than trucks.

    Still need the trucks to get to and from the train station tho, but it should see alot of trucks off the main roads
    Then I could get a Kb Tshirt, move to Timaru and become a full time crossdressing faggot

  15. #15
    Join Date
    25th January 2007 - 21:37
    Bike
    2011 ER-6N
    Location
    Glenfield
    Posts
    2,888
    I thought that was the plan? Wasn't the gubbermint investing a whole lot of money into trains or something?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •