Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 38 of 38

Thread: Firestorm and fuel?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    30th March 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    2001 RC46
    Location
    Norfshaw
    Posts
    10,455
    Blog Entries
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by Hiflyer View Post
    BTW, still keeping it on topic, (Kinda) how does the VTR thou's economy compare to an inline 4's economy? say any given thou from the big Jappa manufacturers?
    Here's a comparison of sorts.
    I used to have a VTR1000 (97); they're apparently around 105hp. I used to get as little as 28mpg riding around town, and typically averaged the low 30s. I now have a VFR800, which although it's only 781cc, is also around 105 hp, albeit with less torques. It's got EFI, and even with running a not at all economical fuel map on the Power Commander, even if I give it a bit of a flogging, it tends to get around 45mpg.
    ... and that's what I think.

    Or summat.


    Or maybe not...

    Dunno really....


  2. #32
    Join Date
    26th September 2008 - 16:46
    Bike
    1997 Honda VTR1000F Firestorm
    Location
    North Shore City
    Posts
    1,439
    I believe that the fault could be inherent in the design. Sometimes the "squish" technology for a particular engine is just not very efficient. The squish area on a piston is where the shape of the top of the piston is moulded to cause eddies (or small whirlpools) in the airflow as it compresses the air fuel mixture. As I understand it, typically you want to create as many eddies as possible, as the burning misture will then be caused to burn more evenly and cleanly throughout the cylinder, with less detonation (inefficient) and more ignition. This is why BMW and Porsche get such great economy with good power- their squish tech is good. "Your squish is strong, Luke"

    Clearly whoever did that part of the VTR design for Honda was having an off day.
    It would be interesting to see what running the bike lean/rich/changing the squish formations would do to performance (since it does have 4 valves per cylinder and can get decent airflow through) .

    And bike tinkerers /dyno people out there willing to try?
    The one thing man learns from history is that man does not learn from history
    Calvin and Hobbes: The surest sign of intelligent life out there is that it has not tried to contact us.
    Its easier to apologise than ask for permission.
    Wise words:
    Quote Originally Posted by quickbuck View Post
    It could be that I have one years experience repeated 33 times!

  3. #33
    Join Date
    18th December 2008 - 18:47
    Bike
    XV 535
    Location
    Epsomish
    Posts
    1,156
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by vifferman View Post
    Here's a comparison of sorts.
    I used to have a VTR1000 (97); they're apparently around 105hp. I used to get as little as 28mpg riding around town, and typically averaged the low 30s. I now have a VFR800, which although it's only 781cc, is also around 105 hp, albeit with less torques. It's got EFI, and even with running a not at all economical fuel map on the Power Commander, even if I give it a bit of a flogging, it tends to get around 45mpg.
    So it's safe to say don't get a VTR thou if you want to save money on fuel? Get a prius?
    Quote Originally Posted by nodrog View Post
    you dont get 180+ hp out of 998cc by being nice to trees.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    14th June 2007 - 16:14
    Bike
    2007 HondaXL1000V Varadero and 14 others
    Location
    Russell, BoI
    Posts
    271
    What do you mean? the SV650 has more or less warranty claims?

    No - the SV1000, according to my contacts in the trade, has had a lot more warranty claims than the VTR1000 (or, yes, the SV650). That's why, despite the less power aspect, I bought my VTR and not an SV1000.

    BTW, still keeping it on topic, (Kinda) how does the VTR thou's economy compare to an inline 4's economy? say any given thou from the big Jappa manufacturers?

    Basically, any I4 should be more economical on fuel. Probably not on tyres (my OE Bridgestones went 12,000km plus, front and rear, use including sealed and unsealed road, and also instructing at ART Days).

  5. #35
    Join Date
    30th March 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    2001 RC46
    Location
    Norfshaw
    Posts
    10,455
    Blog Entries
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by R Sole View Post
    And bike tinkerers /dyno people out there willing to try?
    I was on a couple of VTR forums for a while, and there's a couple of things I learned about the VTR:
    Even with spending HEAPS of money on the engine, there's not a lot of extra power to be had (and I mean, different cams, pistons, flow bench work on the valves, more expensive carbs, etc etc.
    The second thing is even f you do wring some better performance out of the engine, the standard crankcases can't cope with more than about 125 horsies before they crap out.
    In some ways, you're better off detuning the engine for economy and torque. But then there's no point in riding it, coz it'd be no fun anymore.
    ... and that's what I think.

    Or summat.


    Or maybe not...

    Dunno really....


  6. #36
    Join Date
    26th September 2008 - 16:46
    Bike
    1997 Honda VTR1000F Firestorm
    Location
    North Shore City
    Posts
    1,439
    Quote Originally Posted by vifferman View Post
    I was on a couple of VTR forums for a while, and there's a couple of things I learned about the VTR:
    Even with spending HEAPS of money on the engine, there's not a lot of extra power to be had (and I mean, different cams, pistons, flow bench work on the valves, more expensive carbs, etc etc.
    The second thing is even f you do wring some better performance out of the engine, the standard crankcases can't cope with more than about 125 horsies before they crap out.
    In some ways, you're better off detuning the engine for economy and torque. But then there's no point in riding it, coz it'd be no fun anymore.

    I guess you're right- just enjoy it for what it is - a fun twisties tool (and make the 'zorsts louder).
    The one thing man learns from history is that man does not learn from history
    Calvin and Hobbes: The surest sign of intelligent life out there is that it has not tried to contact us.
    Its easier to apologise than ask for permission.
    Wise words:
    Quote Originally Posted by quickbuck View Post
    It could be that I have one years experience repeated 33 times!

  7. #37
    Join Date
    11th March 2010 - 05:14
    Bike
    2005, honda vtr1000f
    Location
    ruapehu
    Posts
    5
    yeh mate my mine is a 05. i can get between 220-240 before the reserve guage starts flashing. when i fill up the tank takes only about 14ltrs (19ltr tank) so must have pretty big reserve
    Quote Originally Posted by slofox View Post
    Anyone got a reasonably recent Firestorm? Does it have a whirlpool in the gas tank? Or is the fuel consumption "acceptable" shall we say..?
    Numbers would be good..oh and tank range too if I may.

    T'anx.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    16th July 2011 - 10:18
    Bike
    Honda VTR1000f Firestorm
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1

    Smile VTR1000f Firestorm gets great mileage

    Yep my VTR1000 02 with 19L tank got 54Mpg/257 km on a tank cruising at freeway speeds red LED reserve had not started flashing, on same trip did some more spirited riding & got 43Mpg/204 on tank over a couple of tanks, no red Led yet. My black VTR has highrise staintunes, love the sound, love the peformance , so much more soul than than my previous bike (VFR800 vtec) which was just too refined.
    So my results agree with geoffc, if this sort of economy is not good enough for anyone from a 1000cc sports motorcycle, they should probably get a push bike.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •