Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 39 of 39

Thread: Radar detectors - what's best?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    7th April 2009 - 19:32
    Bike
    VFR400 NC30 "Silver Surfer"
    Location
    Mt Eden, Auckland
    Posts
    959
    I wouldn't be 100% on the directional stuff anyway, a lot of the signal you get outside line of sight will be reflections which could mean the guy is absolutely anywhere. I can't see the directional thing being worth anything other than being fancier.

    If my detector makes noise, I slow down to the speed limit. If it stops making noise I wait a minute or 2 then let my speed creep up again.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    6th November 2007 - 21:38
    Bike
    black 1
    Location
    here and there
    Posts
    177
    heres some real world info for ya. i had the belltronic sti, 3 of them to be actually. they are the better ones i think, better than the v1 i have now!
    so you might ask why do you have a v1 then. well it seems my late model inline four wrecked them, i had all the proper and expensive gear but they kept on failing, the radar guy couldnt figure out why, maybe to much vibes or too much heat nobody new, which sucked because i really liked the sti!
    the guy just kept replacing them for me but after 3 or 4 of them and only being able to ride half an hour then it would pack a sad and ask for a service, i couldnt go on and had to move to the next best,l v1. so beware, keep your warrenty. the guys at mad sounds know me well now!

  3. #33
    Join Date
    1st November 2005 - 22:36
    Bike
    The Milfhunter, ZXR250C
    Location
    Auckland City
    Posts
    327
    Quote Originally Posted by jono035 View Post
    Yeah, but it also gets much higher rates of false-alarm in real world conditions from memory. It also costs a heap more.
    A false alarm is better than no alarm. nothing wrong with slowing down when you should be anyway.
    Quote Originally Posted by gatch View Post
    he said engine and chassis.. hes going to put the new engine and chassis onto his current bike.. lol

  4. #34
    Join Date
    3rd June 2005 - 23:06
    Bike
    nun
    Location
    In cloud cookoo land
    Posts
    4,834
    Quote Originally Posted by jono035 View Post
    I wouldn't be 100% on the directional stuff anyway, a lot of the signal you get outside line of sight will be reflections which could mean the guy is absolutely anywhere. I can't see the directional thing being worth anything other than being fancier.

    If my detector makes noise, I slow down to the speed limit. If it stops making noise I wait a minute or 2 then let my speed creep up again.
    It's accompanied by how strong and the number of 'hits' that receiver receives. The module is quite smart.

    Theres no point having a radar detector that doesn't cover your ass; literally.

    My V1 doesn't false.. ever.


    :slap:

  5. #35
    Join Date
    7th April 2009 - 19:32
    Bike
    VFR400 NC30 "Silver Surfer"
    Location
    Mt Eden, Auckland
    Posts
    959
    Quote Originally Posted by boomer View Post
    It's accompanied by how strong and the number of 'hits' that receiver receives. The module is quite smart.

    Theres no point having a radar detector that doesn't cover your ass; literally.

    My V1 doesn't false.. ever.
    Good to know they got that sorted out. You can pick up a hell of a lot from the RF splashing off metal objects but that doesn't work quite so well when you're in the middle of nowhere.

    Quote Originally Posted by NSR-Dan View Post
    A false alarm is better than no alarm. nothing wrong with slowing down when you should be anyway.
    You do get why people have radar detectors, right? And true, false alarm better than no alarm, but accurate alarm is better still.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    3rd June 2005 - 23:06
    Bike
    nun
    Location
    In cloud cookoo land
    Posts
    4,834
    Quote Originally Posted by jono035 View Post
    Good to know they got that sorted out. You can pick up a hell of a lot from the RF splashing off metal objects but that doesn't work quite so well when you're in the middle of nowhere.



    You do get why people have radar detectors, right? And true, false alarm better than no alarm, but accurate alarm is better still.
    RF will propagate of any object mate


    :slap:

  7. #37
    Join Date
    7th April 2009 - 19:32
    Bike
    VFR400 NC30 "Silver Surfer"
    Location
    Mt Eden, Auckland
    Posts
    959
    Quote Originally Posted by boomer View Post
    RF will propagate of any object mate
    Nah, gotta have something with good conductivity for it to reflect. A tree is useless as an RF reflector for instance. (I'm an Electrical Engineer )

  8. #38
    Join Date
    3rd June 2005 - 23:06
    Bike
    nun
    Location
    In cloud cookoo land
    Posts
    4,834
    Quote Originally Posted by jono035 View Post
    Nah, gotta have something with good conductivity for it to reflect. A tree is useless as an RF reflector for instance. (I'm an Electrical Engineer )
    So mr Electrical Engineer, are you telling me that if im in the whop whops and there are no man made objects i wont pick up scatter, propogated Rf waves or radar hits other than those directed directly at me?


    :slap:

  9. #39
    Join Date
    7th April 2009 - 19:32
    Bike
    VFR400 NC30 "Silver Surfer"
    Location
    Mt Eden, Auckland
    Posts
    959
    Quote Originally Posted by boomer View Post
    So mr Electrical Engineer, are you telling me that if im in the whop whops and there are no man made objects i wont pick up scatter, propogated Rf waves or radar hits other than those directed directly at me?
    I never said anything about manmade, I said conductive. And you will, but it will be not be as effective, relying more on dispersion and diffraction than reflection. Also you will get reflections off the surfaces of the car you are in and I don't know what the gain plot of the feedhorn antennas look like either.

    Basically it's a crap shoot, but it will definitely be a hell of a lot less signal than an equivalent situation in an urban environment.

    Edit: Bear in mind that 'directed directly at me' isn't really the way it works either, the radar gun will basically be spraying RF all over the damn place...

    I was just trying to provide more information but it looks like this conversation may be taking a turn towards the heated side, which I'm not particularly interested in with respect to radar detectors. Use what works, if you like the V1 then congrats, good choice. I haven't been ticketed with my Escort 8500 and am also extremely happy with its performance. Ultimately that's all that really matters and it all becomes relatively meaningless if they shift to non-radar based speed measurement.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •