Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 35 of 35

Thread: Trap for young players

  1. #31
    Join Date
    18th January 2005 - 10:49
    Bike
    Buell XB12X 'Black Betty'
    Location
    umm, here?
    Posts
    906
    Quote Originally Posted by Woodman View Post
    A correctly used retaining compound with a transition (slip) fit bearing is superior to an interference fit in an aluminium housing.
    Doh....I wonder wot that means?......No, hang on a moment.......

    ......I don't!
    I'm no gynaecologist, however I would be happy to take a look......................

  2. #32
    Join Date
    8th July 2004 - 14:56
    Bike
    KTM 640 Enduro
    Location
    Rotoiti
    Posts
    2,090
    Quote Originally Posted by ducatijim View Post
    Doh....I wonder wot that means?......No, hang on a moment.......

    ......I don't!
    It's engineer speak. Basically having a slightly looser fit of yer bearing in it's hole then gluing the fucker in there is better than having a real tight fit & having to whack the bastard in with a FBH.

    Cheers
    Clints Engineer-Farmer Translation Services Ltd

  3. #33
    Join Date
    15th February 2006 - 15:25
    Bike
    Orange ones! (and a few others...)
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,970
    Quote Originally Posted by Bass View Post
    In addition, it costs no more to manufacture than what they are doing now - maybe less, because the bearing fit becomes less critical.
    You need to buy a KTM.









    Oooooh look, here's one I have for sale!



  4. #34
    Join Date
    15th August 2004 - 17:52
    Bike
    KTM 2T & LC4
    Location
    Rather be riding
    Posts
    3,326
    Quote Originally Posted by Bass View Post
    Sorry guys but you are both missing the point. It's not about the bearing fit. It's simply that if the internal spacer was about .003" (say 75 microns) longer than than the shoulder to shoulder distance in the hub, clearances and fit would be all but irrelevant. Just bang it together and everything is self locating (and you can throw the fkn Loctite away). In addition, it costs no more to manufacture than what they are doing now - maybe less, because the bearing fit becomes less critical.
    Yep, you've lost me - I'm trying, but I just don't get it.

    I don't see how bearing fit is any less critical when the gap to the shoulder on the second side approaches zero. You still need a tight fit to maintain the radial positioning of the wheel on the axle, irrespective of the gap to shoulder.

    Even if the gap was only 75um, you'd still need a retaining compound as the hub aged and flogged out.

    Radial positioning is far more important than lateral. To that end, I've seen plenty of hubs with radial wear causing problems; can't say I've seen any with much if anything in terms of lateral wear.
    Cheers,
    Colin

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve McQueen
    All racers I know aren't in it for the money. They race because it's something inside of them... They're not courting death. They're courting being alive.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    1st March 2007 - 11:30
    Bike
    2014 R1200 GS, 2007 DR 650
    Location
    Whakatane
    Posts
    1,473
    Quote Originally Posted by warewolf View Post
    Yep, you've lost me - I'm trying, but I just don't get it.

    I don't see how bearing fit is any less critical when the gap to the shoulder on the second side approaches zero. You still need a tight fit to maintain the radial positioning of the wheel on the axle, irrespective of the gap to shoulder.
    Radial positioning is far more important than lateral. To that end, I've seen plenty of hubs with radial wear causing problems; can't say I've seen any with much if anything in terms of lateral wear.
    Everything you said is correct except that the tight fit is necessary for radial positioning. That is just not true. The axle is an easy slip-in fit after all.
    There are literally millions of machines out there where the bearings are little more than a drop-in fit and they perform just fine because the bearings are located against shoulders.
    Where the bearings turn in the housings, the process is usually started by lateral loads, but once it starts, of course it generates radial wear.

    For the case in point, the tight fit is required to locate the bearings laterally. With correct design, the bearing contact area with the housing is large enough so that, to initiate wear, rotation relative to the housing is required. For a bearing in good order, the fit does not need to be tight to prevent that relative rotation.

    However, my point in all of this was that the lateral clearances provided are so large that if the hub does decide to move on the bearings, it can move so far that the RHS seal can be completely ejected.
    I grant that, because this is a 2-wheel vehicle, the lateral loads relative to the radial loads, are quite low and so with reasonable precautions, lateral movement is unlikely.
    Even so, it is just poor engineering practice and as I pointed out earlier, requires a particular assembly order to dodge the trap.
    Further, as you have pointed out, the bearing fit is tight as a consequence and despite what others have said, requires heating of the hub for safe assembly/disassembly.
    Neither of these measures would be necessary if it was set up as I suggested.
    Having said that, Mr Suzuki is a far more talented automotive designer than I and so I am interested in why he has done it this way. There will be a good reason.
    The rest of the discussion is largely irrelevant.
    I may not be as good as I once was, but I'm as good once as I always was.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •