Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Fuel consumption of public transport

  1. #1
    Join Date
    26th September 2007 - 13:52
    Bike
    Scorpio
    Location
    Tapu te Ranga
    Posts
    1,471

    Fuel consumption of public transport

    This has been discussed on the Wellington Parking thread, but it's a bit off-topic there and I think it deserves its own thread. There's a general vibe about the place that public transport is fuel efficient because you've got lots of people on the one vehicle. However this ignores the fact that most public transport systems achieve low average occupancy rates, because at peak times the buses and trains are full only in one direction and during the rest of the day they aren't full at all. I saw a really good discussion of this on a blog once, but I can't recall where. I'll keep looking.

    A quick Google search came up with this

    http://www.publicpurpose.com/ut-en2002.htm

    As the title says, automobile and public transport fuel efficiency (per passenger kilometre) are pretty similar.

    I don't particularly trust the site this appears on (they seem to be libertarians--who are well known to be a little careless about facts--and they think BTU/kilometre is a metric measure) but I think the USDOE report they base it on is pretty solid.

    Does anyone have any idea how the numbers stack up for public transport systems in NZ?

    Perhaps what we need to be encouraging is low impact personal transport.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    26th September 2007 - 13:52
    Bike
    Scorpio
    Location
    Tapu te Ranga
    Posts
    1,471
    Quote Originally Posted by Badjelly View Post
    I saw a really good discussion of this on a blog once, but I can't recall where. I'll keep looking.
    Here it is

    http://www.templetons.com/brad/transit-myth.html

    See also

    http://www.templetons.com/brad/roboc...nsit-ends.html

    But before you get too enthusiastic about the end of public transport, have a look at what this bloke thinks should replace it: robot cars!

    http://www.templetons.com/brad/robocars/robot-cars.html

  3. #3
    Join Date
    5th August 2005 - 14:30
    Bike
    Various
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    4,359
    I did see a study done on it once and their conclusion was that essentially it fell along the lines of weight per passenger. The higher the weight per passenger the worse the impact on fuel usage and emissions.

    From worst to best.
    Trains
    Busses
    Cars
    Motorcycles

    That said, public transport would probably save over all in reducing the costs and impact of additional roading.
    Quote Originally Posted by Tank
    You say "no one wants to fuck with some large bloke on a really angry sounding bike" but the truth of the matter is that you are a balding middle-aged ice-cream seller from Edgecume who wears a hello kitty t-shirt (in your profile pic) and your angry sounding bike is a fucken hyoshit - not some big assed harley with a human skull on the front.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    6th June 2008 - 17:24
    Bike
    The Vixen - K8 GSXR600
    Location
    Behind keybd in The Tron
    Posts
    6,518
    The benefit of public transport, I think, is that fact that less vehicles are on the road at once. The fuel consumption aspect is not a compelling argument in my book.

    BUT. It could be a compelling argument if different vehicles were used for public transport. Why not use more, smaller vehicles rather than fewer huge great diesel belching omnibuses. In a place like the Tron, the buses run mostly empty for most of the day. A vehicle of half the size of the buses, or even less, would work as well and be more fuel efficient. During peak hour, just put more of the smaller vehicles on. Have 'em run more often when busy, less often when not...

    Or is that too easy..?
    . “No pleasure is worth giving up for two more years in a rest home.” Kingsley Amis

  5. #5
    Join Date
    26th September 2007 - 13:52
    Bike
    Scorpio
    Location
    Tapu te Ranga
    Posts
    1,471
    Quote Originally Posted by slofox View Post
    The benefit of public transport, I think, is that fact that less vehicles are on the road at once. The fuel consumption aspect is not a compelling argument in my book.
    Nor mine, obviously, but I think a lot of people think it is.

    Quote Originally Posted by slofox View Post
    BUT. It could be a compelling argument if different vehicles were used for public transport. Why not use more, smaller vehicles rather than fewer huge great diesel belching omnibuses. In a place like the Tron, the buses run mostly empty for most of the day. A vehicle of half the size of the buses, or even less, would work as well and be more fuel efficient. During peak hour, just put more of the smaller vehicles on. Have 'em run more often when busy, less often when not...

    Or is that too easy..?
    First, I think the larger bus will use less fuel per passenger when both the large and small bus are full. But when each of them is taking, say, 10 passengers the smaller one will win. So smaller buses might well win overall.

    However I think the big issue is more, smaller buses = more drivers. Labour must make a big part of the costs of public transport.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    1st November 2005 - 08:18
    Bike
    F-117.
    Location
    Banana Republic of NZ
    Posts
    7,048
    The most impressive form of public transport that I have personally encountered, was in a small area of England.
    During the day, after peak commuting time, the larger busses were removed from the roads and replaced with much smaller mini-busses or even mini-vans. These smaller vehicles were normally 3/4 full and they served quite a few backroads on their way in to the local township.
    I laugh when there is a scania or mercedes bus winding around the suburbs of d'Auckland with possibly one passenger on it. Efficient form of ecologically friendly, public transport?

    Even Vanuatu has a better system. A hiace van with a registration plate beginning with a letter "B" means it is a bus. Always busy with people!
    TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •