I've been thinking. Which is always a dangerous thing. I've had some thoughts around ABS and I wanted to put them out there for argument. (Really I wanted to put them out there for sensible discussion in the hope I can learn something - but I'm not that naive - so I will settle for vigorous argument.)
For the sake of argument, lets consider a very simplistic view of ABS, that when a wheel stops rotating, the brake pressure is momentarily released before being re-applied (and repeat ad infinitum).
Lets also consider, that it seems to be a fairly common argument that a competent and practised rider can stop a non-ABS bike more quickly than an ABS equipped bike. For the sake of the argument, lets just assume that the experienced rider won't just panic and grab a handful of brake in the same way that a learner might.
So here is my question: The experienced rider can stop the non-ABS bike more quickly because he can maintain brake pressure right at the threshold of traction. Here's where it gets a bit hazy for me though - he can also do this on the ABS equipped bike. The only difference would seem to be when he misjudges and gets it wrong.
I pose the question because this is often given as the argument against ABS equipped bikes. But it seems to me that the comparison is not actually between ABS and no ABS, but rather between braking styles - can the rider maintain brake pressure at the threshold of adhesion or not.
I'd like to hear what peoples thoughts are. And again, I am naively hoping to avoid this becoming a "pissing match" as I am actually interested in the debate.
(If you're female and easily offended please feel free to substitute "she" for "he" in the above. I'm not inferring anything. I'm male. I used "he".)
Bookmarks