Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 47

Thread: 250s VS 600+?

  1. #16
    Join Date
    3rd August 2006 - 19:35
    Bike
    B12
    Location
    West Auckland
    Posts
    2,800
    A 250 pinned through corners still feels like walking speed.

    A good rider will get so much more out of a larger capacity bike.
    Quote Originally Posted by NinjaNanna View Post
    Wasn't me officer, honest, it was that morcs guy.
    Quote Originally Posted by Littleman View Post
    Yeah I do recall, but dismissed it as being you when I saw both wheels on the ground.
    Quote Originally Posted by R6_kid View Post
    lulz, ever ridden a TL1000R? More to the point, ever ridden with teh Morcs? Didn't fink so.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    4th October 2008 - 13:01
    Bike
    Was a GSXR 1000 k6
    Location
    Cambridge
    Posts
    69
    A 600 is probably better on NZ roads then a 250cc.

    You should watch your self's from glorifying a 250cc, soon the government decide 250cc is well enough and everything else will be banned from the roads and then it's all over!

  3. #18
    Join Date
    28th August 2006 - 22:14
    Bike
    2002 Hayabusa and 2001 Honda XR650R
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    359
    I have very recently upgraded from 250 to 600 and I've been thinking about this subject quite a lot lately.

    I've had so many people telling me how nice are the 250's: light, flickable, more fun at lower speed, etc... and never understood it (all of them were experienced riders). The problem is the only people that can appreciate the lightness of a 250 are the ones that have ridden (enough time) a bigger/heavier/more powerfull bike. Only by comparison, the 250 feels light and flickable. If all you've ever riddein is a 250, no matter how good you get at it you will never feel it's a "toy".

    Another thing to consider is the type of 250 available nowadays. It's one thing to have a gsx250 or another old school 4cyl "sports bike" (not to mention the brilliantly vicious 2 strokes like the NSRs or RGVs) that have been designed as sport bikes, and a totally different thing to have a "half-ass" bike like a GPX for example which is neither a sports bike as bike design or body position nor it is a small light flickable dual sport.

    Don't get me wrong, the gpx was a brilliant bike to learn on - very forgiving and decent power for a 250 but it never felt right and it never felt like a sports bike. It always felt like a compromise between two worlds that got the worst of both. I thoroughtly enjoyed riding it but always felt like it was just an intermediary step in the learning process and not a bike with it's own merits.

    You don't usualy have this problem on bigger bikes - they are built for a purpose and they (usually) do it well. My new ZX6R is a sports bike and really feels like a sports bike. Yes, it is less exhilarating at the same speeds than the 250 but it always feels right riding it.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    17th January 2008 - 13:57
    Bike
    Merida
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    777
    Quote Originally Posted by centaurus View Post

    I've had so many people telling me how nice are the 250's: light, flickable, more fun at lower speed, etc... and never understood it (all of them were experienced riders). The problem is the only people that can appreciate the lightness of a 250 are the ones that have ridden (enough time) a bigger/heavier/more powerfull bike. Only by comparison, the 250 feels light and flickable. If all you've ever riddein is a 250, no matter how good you get at it you will never feel it's a "toy".
    http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...d.php?t=100818

    "Handling. Once cornering the 600 feels more stable, planted and it feels like it could corner faster. Turn in and transition between corners is easier and faster on a 250 than a 600. The 600 has a lot more engine braking so you have to watch your downshifts, or the rear will get very twitchy. Same goes for accelarating out of corners, the more powerful bike may bite you if the surface is not perfect. So, ultimate cornering speed may be faster on a 600 but the 250 is nimbler and more forgiving."
    Ride fast or be last.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    3rd October 2009 - 11:38
    Bike
    2000 Aprilia RSV Mille + GSXR600 K3
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    14
    hard to beat the small bikes for fun on the twisties..
    A 250 or 400 riden well on the twisties will put most bigger bikes to shame..

  6. #21
    Join Date
    14th September 2007 - 16:34
    Bike
    '18 DRZ400SM
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    2,116
    Quote Originally Posted by DangerousBastard View Post
    It's not about speed. It's about the presence of the machine, the extra skills and experience required to handle it.
    Didn't you crash not all that long ago?
    "It would be spiteful, to put jellyfish in a trifle."
    \m/ o.o \m/

  7. #22
    Join Date
    28th August 2006 - 22:14
    Bike
    2002 Hayabusa and 2001 Honda XR650R
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    359
    Quote Originally Posted by Maki View Post
    The 600 has a lot more engine braking so you have to watch your downshifts, or the rear will get very twitchy. Same goes for accelarating out of corners, the more powerful bike may bite you if the surface is not perfect. So, ultimate cornering speed may be faster on a 600 but the 250 is nimbler and more forgiving."
    I've heard this one so many times and it scared me shitless when jumping on the 600 for the first time, but I disagree - it's not always true. The gpx had a compresion ration of 14 to 1 or so. Most times just unwinding the throttle was enough to stop me - I used the brakes very rarely. The ZX6r being heavier and with less compression, releasing the throttle makes little difference. I remember shitting miself at the fist corner when I released the throttle expecting the bike to slow down considerably (like I was used on the GPX) and the bike kept going at almost the same speed for a while.

    But I agree with your comments on the above mentioned thread. You nailed it spot on.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    17th February 2005 - 11:36
    Bike
    Bikes!
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,649
    Basically, the bottom line is always the same... 2 strokes are where it's at for sports bikes, 4 strokes are, and always have been, wrong.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    23rd April 2004 - 19:16
    Bike
    2010 DC Skate Shoes
    Location
    Roxby Downs, SA
    Posts
    7,089
    Hmmm... a 2-stroke, 270deg parallel twin 400cc sports bike would be A LOT of fun!
    KiwiBitcher
    where opinion holds more weight than fact.

    It's better to not pass and know that you could have than to pass and find out that you can't. Wait for the straight.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    17th January 2008 - 13:57
    Bike
    Merida
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    777
    Quote Originally Posted by R6_kid View Post
    Hmmm... a 2-stroke, 270deg parallel twin 400cc sports bike would be A LOT of fun!
    Yes, I would love one, especially if it looks something like this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5nYA8nNVfA
    Ride fast or be last.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    23rd April 2004 - 19:16
    Bike
    2010 DC Skate Shoes
    Location
    Roxby Downs, SA
    Posts
    7,089
    I'd just get an 06+ R6 rolling chassis and put the motor in that. There are pics somewhere of a guy who put an old RD500V into an R6. Looks awesome.
    KiwiBitcher
    where opinion holds more weight than fact.

    It's better to not pass and know that you could have than to pass and find out that you can't. Wait for the straight.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    25th October 2002 - 17:30
    Bike
    GSXR1000
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,291
    I get more satisfaction out of my 1000 than any 250 I've owned or ridden. Why? Because it challenges me. Yeah you can screw a 250 out in safety and get home and think you've done well, if that is what spins your wheels. Or you can push yourself that little bit harder and do the same on a larger bike, and feel satisfied when you find the extra speed.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    2nd March 2004 - 13:00
    Bike
    FransAlp 700
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    14,484
    Quote Originally Posted by mynameis View Post
    Get a TL mate that will solve all ya problem.
    Oh yeah
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ITL250_02.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	138.7 KB 
ID:	146116  

  14. #29
    Join Date
    29th June 2008 - 12:46
    Bike
    Sonic the Second (II)
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    1,728
    Quote Originally Posted by imdying View Post
    Basically, the bottom line is always the same... 2 strokes are where it's at for sports bikes, 4 strokes are, and always have been, wrong.
    WRONG!!! Nothing like the buzz of a triple between your legs!! Go the Singer.

    The upgrade for me was pretty simple...only about 20kg's heavier, 5x more power, better brakes, more nimble through the corners, better tyres, etc, etc ... I'd be mad too go back.

    But it's the torque that makes it so much better. Nothing like being lazy and pulling 6th gear out of "35km/h" corners and doing it better than the first bike

    No regrets...ever.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    16th September 2004 - 16:48
    Bike
    PopTart Katoona
    Location
    CT, USA
    Posts
    6,542
    Blog Entries
    1
    I currently ride a 10hp 400 single. So a 250 sounds like i would have to step up again.
    Mind due - even the internet seems slow to my old FZ1

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •