Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: One in, all in. Would you take the hit as a team?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    14th October 2009 - 20:45
    Bike
    HD Sporty, 65 BSA A65
    Location
    Manawatu
    Posts
    6

    One in, all in. Would you take the hit as a team?

    Classifying Fees by engine capacity is completely ridiculous, motorcyclists travel to the same speed limits. Riders of smaller capacity bikes are not afforded a greater degree of protection than larger bikes and will suffer the same injuries as any other.
    Engine size has no relevance whatsoever on a riders ability to ride safely, the likelhood/frequency of accidents or the injuries that result.
    If anything, riders of smaller capacity bikes are more likely to be novices, and wearing less protective gear.. Im looking at you scooter jockeys..
    If the potential for absorbing this increase was to spread the cost evenly across all motorcycle classes, how do you guys with smaller machines feel about it? Do you think it would be fair?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    17th January 2008 - 13:57
    Bike
    Merida
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    777
    Quote Originally Posted by -BW- View Post
    Classifying Fees by engine capacity is completely ridiculous, motorcyclists travel to the same speed limits. Riders of smaller capacity bikes are not afforded a greater degree of protection than larger bikes and will suffer the same injuries as any other.
    Engine size has no relevance whatsoever on a riders ability to ride safely, the likelhood/frequency of accidents or the injuries that result.
    If anything, riders of smaller capacity bikes are more likely to be novices, and wearing less protective gear.. Im looking at you scooter jockeys..
    If the potential for absorbing this increase was to spread the cost evenly across all motorcycle classes, how do you guys with smaller machines feel about it? Do you think it would be fair?
    Yea, I bet there are lots of 250 riders who can't wait to fork out $$$ for people hooning around on gixxer thous.
    Ride fast or be last.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    14th October 2007 - 18:13
    Bike
    2013 GSXR-1300 Hayabusa
    Location
    Up above the mucky muck
    Posts
    2,479
    Quote Originally Posted by Maki View Post
    Yea, I bet there are lots of 250 riders who can't wait to fork out $$$ for people hooning around on gixxer thous.
    Until they get said gixxer thou.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    7th October 2008 - 19:36
    Bike
    BMW R1200RT
    Location
    Masterton
    Posts
    397
    Thanks -BW- . An interesting piont:
    Ride it until the wheels fall off...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    13th November 2006 - 22:22
    Bike
    Suzuki Marauder VZ800
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    616
    Quote Originally Posted by -BW- View Post
    Classifying Fees by engine capacity is completely ridiculous, motorcyclists travel to the same speed limits. Riders of smaller capacity bikes are not afforded a greater degree of protection than larger bikes and will suffer the same injuries as any other.
    Engine size has no relevance whatsoever on a riders ability to ride safely, the likelhood/frequency of accidents or the injuries that result.
    If anything, riders of smaller capacity bikes are more likely to be novices, and wearing less protective gear.. Im looking at you scooter jockeys..
    If the potential for absorbing this increase was to spread the cost evenly across all motorcycle classes, how do you guys with smaller machines feel about it? Do you think it would be fair?
    You seem to have already accepted the "necessity" for this fee increase. That point has yet to be proven by the gubbermint, at least to my satisfaction.
    Redefining slow since 2006...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    6th June 2008 - 17:24
    Bike
    The Vixen - K8 GSXR600
    Location
    Behind keybd in The Tron
    Posts
    6,518
    BW - you make a very valid point. There are many machines under 601cc that will out-perform bigger bikes. As you say, it makes no sense to categorize by capacity. It would make more sense to categorize by power to weight ratio if that has to be done.

    Personally I think it should be equalized across the board - as you say, the risk is the same regardless of capacity.

    Failing that, I could sell the 645cc SVS and buy a 599cc R6 that would give me about 50% more power...now that makes sense dunnit?


    My second point relates to ACC's internal costs. Just what proportion of their turnover is consumed internally? In the case of the "sensitive claims" unit, they gobble up $8.00 for every $1.00 that therapists get paid. How efficient is that?
    . “No pleasure is worth giving up for two more years in a rest home.” Kingsley Amis

  7. #7
    Join Date
    17th January 2008 - 13:57
    Bike
    Merida
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    777
    Quote Originally Posted by slofox View Post
    BW - you make a very valid point. There are many machines under 601cc that will out-perform bigger bikes. As you say, it makes no sense to categorize by capacity. It would make more sense to categorize by power to weight ratio if that has to be done.

    Personally I think it should be equalized across the board - as you say, the risk is the same regardless of capacity.

    Failing that, I could sell the 645cc SVS and buy a 599cc R6 that would give me about 50% more power...now that makes sense dunnit?


    My second point relates to ACC's internal costs. Just what proportion of their turnover is consumed internally? In the case of the "sensitive claims" unit, they gobble up $8.00 for every $1.00 that therapists get paid. How efficient is that?


    Nonsense! It has 46cc more so it MUST be more powerful and exponentially more dangerous. The R6 barely has enough power to get me up hills when the Wellington breeze is blowing.
    Ride fast or be last.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    20th July 2009 - 14:30
    Bike
    Evo 5
    Location
    doggtown
    Posts
    341
    You reckon the bigger bikes that crash more are those harleys that motorcycle gangsters ride? always hearing how they crash while pissed. wearing a helmet designed for a nazi soldier rather than to protect the head
    Thats whats up.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •