Yeah i reckon so,they also have accidents,so should therefore also have to pay a fee.
Yeah i reckon so,they also have accidents,so should therefore also have to pay a fee.
My 9 yr old rode her bike, and still does on the pavement... with a helmet... I agree if you ride on the rode, as a sport cyclist you pay a ACC levy when you buy the bike, (INTENTION TO USE THE ROAD)... same with horse riders, rugby players, etc...
They just have not done their homework AGAIN, as usual!!!!
If that's the case, then why aren't we all coveed by PAYE ACC levies.
Why single out motorists for onerous levies, when it has already been shown (proved even) on this site, that Pedestrians & cyclists cost more per injury?
At least risky jobs incur higher PAYE ACC levies, i.e forestry workers
Where's the fair & equitable levies for weekend rugby players (non-proffesional), cycists, dirt bikers, mountain bikers etc (the list is endless)
"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy" - Benjamin Franklin
It doesn't matter whether you went to hospital or not - you were lucky - good on you. But other cyclists get hit by cars and spend months in hospital and collect ACC. If you use the road, you must pay. I ride my motorcycle along Tamaki drive every day and see cyclists taking up the bus lane (so much so the buses don't even use it any more) in packs of 50 riding 5 abreast sometimes. And ironically, there is a cycle lane provided for them on the footpath, but they choose not to use it, they choose the road. Just a week or so ago a car crashed into a group of them and injuring several and killing one. The car was in the wrong, but that's not the point.
NONE.... I am referring to adults.. not kids... kids don't claim ACC (or do they)... I am purely referring to cyclists.. not kids on bikes. I am a working mum, who RODE a bike for exercise... but the other day a woman and man on a blind bend (me on motorbike going opposite way), came around 2 abreast, any car would have killed her on impact from behind... or she would have been serious and on ACC... she was so close to the center line it frightened me.. WEARING A HI-VIZ... I don't think that would have saved her.
Yeh!! thats right we are badbut they are worse
![]()
Well thats solved that problem, next please
What about an idea? like .. oh lets say registering a plate to an owner not a vehicleThe right to change that plate to whatever vehicle you are driving / riding at that time. One plate, one set of fees
Nah bugger alternative ideas, lets keep pointing the finger at everyone who is worse than us![]()
Yes, kids are covered by ACC as far as I know. They get free hospital treatment paid for by ACC and they can also get long-term disability payments.
Oh that I don't understand, they don't pay, they don't work.. or is there something I don't know about ACC... surely its a parental claim to look after a sick child... my sister daughter as been off school the whole of Term 3 with a broken leg... she couldn't claim ACC!!! MMM food for thought.
we are suppose to be...
Risky jobs are covered by the Business ACC levies
Yes kids are fully covered by ACC... usually comes out of parents PAYE ACC...
as I have said all along the fundamental argument has to be that ACC is a "no faults" as soon as the point fingers then it became a blaming gane and AT fault syste.
From the ACC Website
Eligibility for injury cover for everyone in New Zealand
Everyone in New Zealand is eligible for comprehensive injury cover:
- no matter what you’re doing or where you are when you’re injured – driving, playing sport, at home, at work.
- no matter how the injury happened, even if you did something yourself to contribute to it.
- no matter what age you are or whether you’re working – you might be retired, a child, on a benefit or studying.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks