Oh brilliant - now I'm gonna get pinged twice!
This is the sort of shit that will make me pretend to be a biker to infiltrate those biker groups and then beat bikers up for victimising me as a cyclist - Then I'm gonna infiltrate the car lovers society so I can beat those fuckers up for victimising me as a motorcyclist.
FFS the gubberint are the enemy here.![]()
In space, no one can smell your fart.
There will never be a fair system unless they drop every levy we pay at present and introduce a levy for being Human.
So 10-14 year olds should either be banned from cycling or pay twice as much ACC as the rest of the cyclists.When the relative populations of these age groups are considered, cyclists aged 10-14 are the group
with the most risk of hospitalisation, with a rate of 14 per 100,000 head of population each year
(population data from census). Other age groups between five and 55 have rates in the region of 6-8 per
100,000 each year. Above the age of 55 the rate of hospitalisation per 100,000 gradually decreases.
Damn kids costing the rest of us so much money![]()
To name a few that ride the main roads... I rode a avanti bike!
Does not matter if its on the highway.... someone pays !
Speed makes a huge difference naturally, but bikers don't (from looking) ride two abreast, and if they do they are idiots.... cyclists although do... and expect hi-viz to make them visible (not)... I STILL SAY ALL ROAD RULES APPLY TO EVERYONE... if you ride a road bike on a main 100km road you must be able to read and write... and to learn the rules... like all of us.
Charging cyclist's was among the most laughable ideas to come out of this whole ACC proposition. How the hell is it supposed to be policed? Where do you draw the bracket between a cyclist having to register their bike or not? Should the guy on his BMX have to register his bike because he popped down to the dairy to grab some milk?, because the guy training for the Triathlon who just rode down the same street does, or what about the guy commuting home from work on the footpath?, or the kid riding home from school?
Fucking rediculous, bikers are just targeting another minority group to take the heat off themselves.
And $50 a year would never 'make' cyclist's abide by the road rules, generally the 'Hit by a car/truck etc' consequence makes things quite clear to anyone who's willing to take it to the road, or atleast with half a brain in their helmet.
Instead of targeting specific road users we should be looking at spreading it throughout all groups that claim ACC, just as Rosie said:
Imagine what would happen to grass roots sport in New Zealand if we starting charging people ACC levies to play it?. Teams would drop off like flies, especially in lower socio-economic groups of the population who decide to get into sport as opposed to other illegal activites because the money isn't there in the first place to entertain themselves with. Whether its those teams created to get people socialising, or working on their fitness/weight its always been a positive thing. If you happen to get injured, well thats life outside of the lounge isn't it?
Brilliant idea, 'equitable' is what the Government should be looking at to bring themselves out of the current mess without treading on too many toes.
Pedestrians get hurt on roads too. Charge every fucken' one.
No charge the owners for letting them out of the gate.... I am although not that cruel having two dogs... whom roam out the gate... but if push comes to shove the human comes first... I pay the consequences of my dogs actions.
There is no true answer... there is one answer... but who knows what that is!!! Not me for sure.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks