On a Motorcycle you're penetrating distance, right along with the machine!! In a car you're just a spectator, the windshields like a TV!!
'Life's Journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out! Shouting, ' Holy sh!t... What a Ride!! '
We haven't see n the car stats have we.
We would have.
Single car
Car vs Car
Car vs bike.
I wonder in how many of those 100's of thousands of accidents motorcyles are to blame for.
I would say less than 2%!!
See, you can twist stats any way you want.
One way says bikes are responsible for 60% of their accidents.
The other say cars are responsible for 98% of their accidents.
Some things are worth dying for, living is one of them.
So the way I interpret this - of all the motorcycle accidents 39% of them are due to an 'at fault' car (or van or whatever) driver. So surely that fact alone is enough to justify the car drivers subsidising the cost of motorcycle ACC claims - i.e. 39% of the motorcycle ACC costs should be paid for from the money collected from car rego ACC levies.
I would be confident that the ACC claims from car drivers would not feature any significant amount that was due to motorcycle riders. We rarely injure car drivers (even on accidents where the motorcyclist was at fault) while they often injure us.
Personally I have never in my life made an ACC claim for any kind of vehicle related injury and yet they want to double* my levy for my 400cc scooter - I am not happy about that at all.
* That would be double the current levy, which already went up significantly compared to last year.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks