www.AdventureRidingNZ.co.nz NZ's dedicated Adventure Riding Community
Forums, free GPS track downloads and much more. Now over 5700 members, are you one of them?
Its not rocket science, but a good 2 into 1 system will shed 8kgs from up under the seat, improve fuel range considerably, reduce the engines heat retention via the cats removal and produce a magnificant sound without bugging the neighbours.
Best $900 or so anyone could throw at a 990!
( oh and of course, they look WAY trick over any 2 can job!!!!!)
I'm no gynaecologist, however I would be happy to take a look......................
I would rather shed 8kg from on top of the seat but it aint gonna work in the short term. You also have some room for a long range tank on one side as well for those moments...You know, those uncomfortable walking moments we may have had in the past...
I like two pipes on a bike, sort of the same reason I like two headlights....
Maybe I am seeing double too much.....
Note to self, get eyes tested......
Ok, I understand the weight loss, that makes sense. My factory pipes are de catted so I've already got some weight loss there and the associated heat reduction, but one of those pipes still weighs more than both the FMF's together.
As to the fuel range, is there a gain from going to one pipe or are you referring to the ability to mount a 2nd tank where the pipe once was for greater fuel capacity?
www.AdventureRidingNZ.co.nz NZ's dedicated Adventure Riding Community
Forums, free GPS track downloads and much more. Now over 5700 members, are you one of them?
wouldn't the weight from the fuel and tank = same or even more.
I FEEL THE NEED, THE NEED FOR SPEED
my ride picshttp://picasaweb.google.com/sueycarter
other ride pics http://picasaweb.google.com/113645336286831595353
we made it out this morn for a play, bit of exploring up the forestry tracks..
2 950's and DR650.
some great view up the old logging tracks.
have to return some day soon..
JMJ
I FEEL THE NEED, THE NEED FOR SPEED
my ride picshttp://picasaweb.google.com/sueycarter
other ride pics http://picasaweb.google.com/113645336286831595353
www.AdventureRidingNZ.co.nz NZ's dedicated Adventure Riding Community
Forums, free GPS track downloads and much more. Now over 5700 members, are you one of them?
I'm no rocket scientist alright so its little wonder I'm a bit confused buy the above reasoning as the best $900.00 to spend on ya big Katoom....
The heat/noise reasons can be acheived regardless of twin or single pipes
If you take the $900.00 for the pipe convert, then add say another hummm I dunno...say $800.00 to $1000.00 for a new tank the cost benefit is not such an advantage? add in the addtional fuel & tank weight, then the weight advantage lessons.
The "considerable increase in fuel range" is a bit curious ? If your not refering to the ability to fit an extra tank then in most cases less fuel consumption generally equates to a reduction in performance/power?
Still looks like a personal coice decision to me. If this is fuel capacity debate why not buy a safrai tank they hold more than the small rear ender don't they?
I FEEL THE NEED, THE NEED FOR SPEED
my ride picshttp://picasaweb.google.com/sueycarter
other ride pics http://picasaweb.google.com/113645336286831595353
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks