Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: 4 x 4 injuries?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    3rd January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    All of them
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    12,472

    4 x 4 injuries?

    'Apparently' the rates of injury in 4 x 4 vehicles are significantly higher than sedans.

    Anybody seen any data?

    If it's a legit claim it would add to the discrimination angle.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    I think that it is actually that injury rates in accidents involving SUVs are higher. The SUV occupants are safer , but the other vehicle fares worse .

    however, the claim may be disinformative US figures.

    SUVs do not (older ones anyway) have the same "crumple zones" as cars. In America they test cars with the dummy passengers not seat belted in. SUVs fare worse in such tests.

    In NZ where everybody wears seat belts (insignificant exceptions) it's the other way round
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  3. #3
    Join Date
    3rd January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    All of them
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    12,472
    It still reads they cause more injury so when will they be/ why aren't they targeted.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    31st December 2004 - 07:28
    Bike
    SV1000s
    Location
    Upper Hutt
    Posts
    360
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Dave View Post
    It still reads they cause more injury so when will they be/ why aren't they targeted.
    Because by the logic that's currently applied it's the injured party that must pay the extra for their cover.
    "There must be a one-to-one correspondence between left and right parentheses, with each left parenthesis to the left of its corresponding right parenthesis."

  5. #5
    Join Date
    4th February 2007 - 19:23
    Bike
    None - s'fucked
    Location
    West Auckland
    Posts
    2,182
    I'm not convinced that data would be collected, BD. And if it is, it's probably incomplete (like motorcycle engine size accident data )

    There is the angle that repeated drink-drivers, disqualified drivers, boy racers, etc do not pay extra ACC levies.
    Quote Originally Posted by rachprice View Post
    Jrandom, You are such a woman hating cunt, if you weren't such a misogynist bastard you might have a better luck with women!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •