In brief as this is way OT: In Army Rifle drills they wave their weapons around without ensuring they are pointed in a safe direction at all times (Rule 2) and they forcibly ground the stock of their weapons which could cause a firearm to accidentally discharge - in either case they are failing to treat all firearms as if loaded (Rule 1). The Army should be teaching firearms safety, not promoting needless and dangerous showing off. They might as well teach their recruits to spin their pistols around their trigger fingers, Wild West style.Originally Posted by Storm
The law dictates that if something that looks like a firearm is presented, it is a loaded firearm, whether or not it is real or, in fact, loaded. A member of the public, witnessing Motu's client present a pistol, could well feel threatened.
Even if it was a toy or an air pistol, the bloke was guilty of brandishing a loaded firearm in public. If it was a real pistol, it should have been locked in a police-approved carrying case if being carried between home and pistol club as per the conditions of the pistol licence the bloke should have had.
Whatever the case, he should not have had anything that looks like a pistol in such a location in his 4WD that he could pick it up and wave it about.
Things like that tend to panic the general public and then the popular press leaps on the band-wagon - exaggerating claims - and the vote hunters in the govt start making noises about further restrictions.
It's already hard enough on those who are serious about firearms in this country - the competitors, the hunters, the collectors - without dick heads behaving irresponsibly like that. If he'd been seen by some little old granny or what if the cops had pulled him over and found the pistol in his cab, there would have been major consequences and the rest of us would have borne the brunt.
Kinda like when people behave recklessly in vehicles, eh...
Bookmarks