Ohhh your taking the mickey ain't ya?
Before your start throwing figures around, make sure they are the correct ones.
Usually is not afaik an acceptable statistical term. Even if it were, it isn't so. Shall we try sometimes instead?
75%? Been under a rock for the last month? Even ACC Only claim around 60% are our fault.
Originally Posted by Mully
MD Not really on topic for this thread but have a think about your post with regards to user pays for ACC.
Rather than hitting vehicle registrations the way they suggest, if Gov't levy 2% on tyres (all tyres) for ACC they would spread their net wider and get a greater return and gather from most of those who currently pay nothing as well! (cyclists etc)
Think about it for a while and see how many of the above (and beyond) would then be paying some of their share while in pursuit of their leisure activities!
Everybody uses something with wheels to go about their day to day activities at some time of the day or night
Just something to think about but of course I may be completely wrong!
And 75% of the FATAL motorcycle accidents. (you know, the ones that make the papers on Monday mornings)
http://www.transport.govt.nz/researc...-Factsheet.pdf (bottom of page 4)
Yes that's true, do remember that... Just meaning when they have a crash there impact is far greater.. so there ACC should be high to suit![]()
Unless the trucking industry did manage to clean up its act (and stop the culture of the blow-hard truck drivers having a wank session down at the local pub bragging about doing this or that run in x amount of time) and reduce the amount of accidents trucks were having. Then there's no need for the ACC bean counters to target them in the first place.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks