From another thread:
Posted by Candor:
ACC is a signatory to the National Road Safety Committee memorandum of understanding - which is advised by and reports to the European Commission and World Bank, which funds it's transport safety research on us.
The secrecy clause in the MOU means ACC cannot consult about and has to do what it's told by NRSC, and is bound by the secrecy agreement not to tell us what that is - only OIAs outpower that.
I spent several days recently reading the NRSC advisors meeting minutes (10,000 pages) under an OIA they fought 6 mths to stop being honored - after ombudsmen etc we finally got in.
What I picked up about MCs is this
1) the targets set for toll and injury reductions require reducing mc injuries a la reducing mc use.
2) Various road safety chunks are allocated to each Govt Dept with a CEO on the NRSC
3) ACCs 2 special projects starting this year are safer vehicle tech and mc's
The World bank advisors take money from industry for their global road safety psartnerrship advice group - the one that deals with the NZ case study.. particularly from several auto manufacturers
One policy advice is for Govts to fund tv ads promoting safe car tech... hmm.
One of their policy advice was for our Govt to get a report on promoting low alcohol beer for road safety... hmmm.
Adding all this up plus the knowledge I have from talking to ACC and NZTA staff who hold a genuine belief mcs are coffins on wheels (likely due to GRSP mentors indoctrinating them) I believe they believe the way to do claims management is to force you into other transport modes.
Most of the civil servants aren't rocket scientists nor have cause to suspect stats fired at 'em. Told MCs have 16x the risk (equals drunk risk) they have likely trusted this "fact" among a whole raft of propaganda.
The world bank controller of NZ road safety is an award winning propagandist - noone can write 400 page documents that repeat BS in 500 different ways better than he can - NOONE. Civil servant must reads!
There are only about 3 key persons pulling the strings on road safety in NZ since 1995 - but the problem is that they are inbred megalomaniacs with absolute faith in the nonsenses they dream up. And unfortunately are also very credible and impressive despite their qualifications not being gold plated (BEcs circa 1960's). They have friends in high places and are imo as a psych nurse narcissists. We luckily stopped one getting Wellingtonian of the year with a letter campaign to the dom post.
Posted by Buellbabe:
Who's behind it all?
Well there are a number of conspirators and yes! make no mistake! There IS a conspiracy.
On my way to Welly for the protest I had a very interesting and eye opening convo with the cop who was riding with us (yes with us! he is a biker who happens to be a cop).
He is an older guy, has been around and has been privy to some pretty top level-behind-closed-doors stuff.
When I said to him that it feels like there is some master plan to get rid of motorbikes he said "yep there is and LAND TRANSPORT are behind it. Its their aim to have ZERO motorbikes on NZ roads by 2050".
Apparently their original plan wanted bikes gone by 2030 but they grudgingly conceded that might be a bit difficult. This cop has been in meetings and seen big posters on the walls with a picture of a bike inside a circle and yes you guessed it...a big slash across the circle...
We have got one mother of a fight on our hands people!
Its no joke to say that whats happening now is just the beginning.
Bookmarks