hey, here's one to chew on...
my bike is one of three in the country bought out by Suzuki NZ a couple of years back for some show and i bought it from a dealer a few weeks back...
i got snapped by the fuzz down taupiri way doing 116kmh and i had the right to write (repitition, as my english teacher would say) in and argue it...so, i did.
my bike is in mph, and i had the dealer put a 'white line' at 60 (around 98kmh) but i argued the fact that the guy actually put it on 65, he was taller than me, so angle of sight also contributed, and the angle of the speedo did exacerbated the problem...i then admitted that i exceeded the limit, as every kiwi rider and biker does, by what i figured to be 5-odd kms, being a quiet road so early in the morning. i did not dispute the fact i was doing 116, i plainly said i wasn't aware i was doing 116. makes sense???
so why was my lengthy explanation including maths and physics turned down when a friend on four wheels got a 124kmh ticket wiped because he was overtaking???
if there are any cops on this site, i would love to hear a reason...it surely is not because my explanation was above the mentality of those in the infringment bureau, and i am sure you are spending more time on unsolved rape cases in sth auckland, and then of course, it does take time to clear porn off your desktops...
should i take this to court? love to hear views on this...
Bookmarks