ask yourself this question:
"Would I like to be tried by a jury of people who couldnt get of jury service?"
Oh, and as for these hippies, I can see them getting off the burglary, but not the wilful damage, but whatever. Why was that thing made of PVC in the first place, and why werent appropriate measures taken to safeguard it if they didnt want retards to come along and fuck it up?
Stupid gummint doing it on the cheap again, thats the actual issue....
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
I think treason requires a declaration of war. The realitiy is that this is just piddling stuff. i doubt very much whether they actually saved any lives as claimed. As for the terrorist name I think this does an injustice to those that have been killed and maimed byr real terrorists.
I think the real indignation of many here is not the fact that they got off per se but that those with a different political persuasion were found not guilty...............and that has pissed off some on here more than common sense should allow.
Skyryder
Free Scott Watson.
I think you've all taken this entirely out of context.
This has nothing to do with the justification arguement or whatever.
It is no more than a example of the average intelligence of people on Juries. I've only been on one jury, and my conclusion is that average intelligence is just that. A whole lot of people who have (significantly) below average intelligence are on juries.
So a couple of retards are now being talked up as a great victory for freedom.
EXCUSE ME.
These same people that are talking it up are aso on juries ... QED
Originally Posted by Albert
You fellas need to up your meds......
The Heart is the drum keeping time for everyone....
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks